18:00:33 <GeKo> #startmeeting tor browser 18:00:33 <MeetBot> Meeting started Mon Apr 11 18:00:33 2016 UTC. The chair is GeKo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:33 <MeetBot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 18:00:40 <GeKo> yes, forevar 18:00:56 <GeKo> welcome to a new tor browser meeting everybody 18:01:04 <GeKo> who wants to go first today? 18:01:24 * mcs will give the first report 18:01:33 <mcs> Last week, Kathy and I spent most of our time on ESR45 work. 18:01:37 <mcs> We reviewed the rebased brade/mcs patches in #15197 and made some comments. 18:01:47 <mcs> We also checked the upstreamed fixes to make sure they were OK (which led to #18777). 18:01:55 <mcs> We created a patch for #18602 which also fixes some issues with the rebased #12827 patch. 18:02:01 <mcs> We created a fixup for the rebased #6253 patch. 18:02:07 <mcs> We reviewed GeKo’s fix for #18466 and did a little research for #16328. 18:02:16 <mcs> Finally, we helped a little with Mac OS code signing issues. 18:02:21 <mcs> This week we will look at other ESR45 issues, do code reviews, and help as needed. 18:02:26 <mcs> arthuredelstein: Are you going to work on #18777 or should Kathy and I take it? 18:02:32 <mcs> Time permitting, we will look into the bullet/background issue that was reported here: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/15197#comment:32 18:02:37 <mcs> (we should at least verify that it is an issue and open a new ticket). 18:02:41 <mcs> Also, Kathy and I will both be away from keyboard this Friday. 18:02:46 <mcs> That’s all for us. 18:03:29 <GeKo> mcs: if you could look at the things in #18546 that would be helpful 18:03:41 <GeKo> i thougght about splitting the work 18:03:59 <GeKo> could you look at the "should fix" stuff? 18:04:01 <arthuredelstein> mcs: If you and Kathy have time to look at #18777 that would be great. 18:04:22 <GeKo> and i would look at the "more eyes needed part" 18:04:32 <arthuredelstein> mcs: (Since you know that code much better than me.) 18:04:44 <mcs> We will look at the “should fix” items. 18:04:54 <GeKo> ok, thanks 18:04:59 <mcs> Oh, and we will take #18777 too. 18:05:31 <arthuredelstein> thanks! :) 18:07:07 * GeKo can go now 18:07:15 <GeKo> I worked on the OS X signing. It feels we are close and just need the correct 18:07:15 <GeKo> certificate :). Thanks to mcs and brade for helping. 18:07:25 <GeKo> I looked at #18602, #18597 and #18791 and reviewed the newer branches for 18:07:25 <GeKo> #15197. 18:08:02 <GeKo> I worked a bit at #14970 18:08:10 <GeKo> I found #18767, luckily before the alpha. And I convinced myself to try fixing 18:08:11 <GeKo> #13419, ugh. 18:09:17 <GeKo> oh, and i gained another shitload of experience points for dealing with bisecting mingw related issues (#18290) 18:09:28 <GeKo> i should go up a level soon, i feel 18:09:46 <GeKo> but on the positive side i found things we need for the switch to esr52 already 18:10:31 <GeKo> this week i'll spent time on #13419, fix my patch for #14970, work on #18546 18:10:41 <GeKo> and hopefully deal with the OS X signing 18:11:17 <GeKo> oh, and, of course, i hope we can get the nightlies going with esr45 18:12:05 <GeKo> that's it for me. 18:12:10 * arthuredelstein can go 18:12:48 <arthuredelstein> This week I have been working on #15197. 18:13:15 <arthuredelstein> I have been trying to fix all the known issues or open tickets when it was a bigger issue. 18:13:24 <arthuredelstein> So this week I will continue to try to get the rebased branch ready for use with nightlies. 18:13:36 <arthuredelstein> Once I get that done I will go back to working on the other tickets for the ESR45 alpha: #16998, #16326, #16673. 18:13:52 <arthuredelstein> That's it for me. 18:14:01 <GeKo> do you need help with the latter three? 18:14:19 <GeKo> should we try to get one assigned to someone else? 18:15:46 <arthuredelstein> I have some work done on the first two. If someone is eager to get started on the last one (#16673) that is fine with me. 18:16:55 <GeKo> and looking at the child tickets for #15197 it seems thre are blocking on you if i see that correctly 18:17:00 <GeKo> *three 18:17:01 <GeKo> ok 18:17:31 <arthuredelstein> yes. I'll remove my ownership from #16673 and anyone can take it if they have time. 18:17:41 <GeKo> i think we can ook how the week goes and have some time left toschulde remaining work next monday 18:17:54 <GeKo> *look 18:17:59 <GeKo> ugh 18:18:06 <mcs> I guess we may need to take the “disable” route rather than “isolate” if we run out of time. 18:18:13 <GeKo> s/toschulde/to schedule/ 18:18:20 <GeKo> yes 18:18:21 <mcs> (for #16673) 18:20:24 * boklm can go 18:20:42 <boklm> This past week I reviewed #18331 and added some fixes 18:20:45 <boklm> On #18597 I moved the User Timing API test to a separate test 18:20:57 <boklm> I converted some mozmill tests to marionette 18:20:59 <boklm> This week I'm planning to finish #16009 and add Performance Observer tests on #18597 18:21:06 <boklm> That's it for me. 18:21:39 <GeKo> it seems we lost our windows nightly tests again? 18:21:51 <boklm> ah yes, I will look 18:21:51 <GeKo> but it is definitely cool to see the OS X ones, nice 18:23:09 <armadev> (i found it neat, from our www logs, that we have more .tar.gz downloads than we have .dmg downloads) 18:23:52 <GeKo> move in the right direction i'd say ;) 18:24:25 * meejah curious how many downloaded the corresponding .sig :) 18:24:50 <GeKo> anyone else here for a status update? 18:25:04 <mikeperry> I am around 18:25:28 <mikeperry> I am still trying to get the right apple account for the signing cert. hope to talk to nick about that today 18:27:11 <mikeperry> oh, I also posted my partial progress to #18546 18:27:46 <mikeperry> that will need more eyes, etc 18:27:50 <GeKo> do you plan to get to the remaining things before the alpha? 18:30:05 <mikeperry> when is that? 18:30:30 <GeKo> i guess our code freeze for it is friday next week 18:30:37 <mikeperry> I will have some time to do more code review today and wednesday 18:30:39 <GeKo> and it should go our April 26ish 18:30:42 <GeKo> *out 18:32:55 <GeKo> do we have something for discussion in case we are done with the status updates? 18:33:57 <mikeperry> ok, I will aim to get through the review before the code freeze. bear in mind that there are already things that should be spot-checked and/or patched from the notes I posted, btw 18:34:55 <GeKo> yeah, we shared the workload already, see above 18:36:37 <mikeperry> aha, sorry I came in late. great. 18:36:59 <mikeperry> I will periodically update the ticket as son as I find anything else that needs looking at 18:37:08 <mikeperry> otherwise I will just continue going through XPCOM stuff 18:37:19 <GeKo> ok, sounds good, thanks 18:38:31 <GeKo> alright, it seems we are fine for today. 18:39:08 <GeKo> thanks all for attending. and now back to the extra week mozilla gave us. *baf* 18:39:12 <GeKo> #endmeeting