13:31:21 <nickm> #startmeeting
13:31:21 <MeetBot> Meeting started Wed Oct  8 13:31:21 2014 UTC.  The chair is nickm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:31:21 <MeetBot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
13:31:26 <asn> don't have much to report though
13:31:34 <asn> i'm now squashing my guardfraction branch
13:31:36 <athena> hi meeting
13:31:37 <asn> so that it's reviewable
13:31:42 <nickm> keen
13:31:50 <asn> it has 4 XXXs in it, that are questions to the reviewer.
13:31:53 <nickm> I think we've been building up things that need reviewing
13:31:56 <asn> other than that, it should be fine I think.
13:31:58 <asn> yes.
13:32:00 <athena> there's a global scheduler branch with configurable thresholds now
13:32:08 <nickm> cool. thanks, athena!
13:32:10 <asn> i tried to review some of your branches... but I couldn't get confidence...
13:32:11 <athena> and i've got a review of #11243 on the way
13:32:34 <asn> i reviewed the zlib one with the !finished. the idea looked sane, but I didn't look at the zlib API to understand what's really going on with avail_in...
13:32:36 <nickm> nice.  I did a huge pile of tests for make sure #11243 was right
13:33:08 <athena> also, i looked at #12862 and tentatively decided we should leave it as-is to preserve symmetry between the pre- and post-switch tests
13:33:19 <nickm> ok
13:33:24 <athena> any other opinions before i close it?
13:33:48 <nickm> seems ok to me
13:33:54 <athena> ok
13:36:20 <nickm> athena: did you see the questions Yawning and I had about the branch when we started reviewing it?  I was supposed to write those up after Yawning and I had some time to go through it more... but I think I should just dig up my notes and send them unedited since I apparently haven't been on the ball wrt that for the last couple of days :/
13:36:34 <nickm> s/the branch/the scheduler branch/
13:37:05 <athena> it's fine - no, i didn't see, but you can send me some notes
13:37:39 <nickm> ok
13:38:24 <nickm> So as for me, I've been poking #11243, writing a huge pile of tests for that, thinking about how to get our router parsing code to be less scary, and implementing more prop#220 stuff
13:38:37 <nickm> as of this morning, it works with chutney, and the authorities do the right thing with microdescs
13:40:27 <nickm> I should take a break some time (even though I am really enjoying myself) to review more code and answer some emails.
13:40:35 <nickm> anybody want to review code with me later today?
13:41:01 <asn> sure
13:41:11 <asn> but I can't do this too late.
13:41:17 <asn> i can do it in 1-2 hours, if you want.
13:41:45 <asn> by then maybe I will have my guardfraction branch ready, so we can trade reviews :)
13:42:58 <nickm> okay. I should be around a lot today.
13:43:23 <asn> ok
13:43:42 <nickm> We should also be working on chutney stuff to try to get coverage working with chutney, and more sponsorS prelims done
13:43:48 <nickm> but that's an email from roger I need to re-read first
13:44:14 <nickm> anything else we should talk about today? Anybody else need something to do?
13:44:18 <teor> what needs to be done with coverage and chutney?
13:44:25 <teor> (sorry to jump in)
13:45:41 <nickm> So, when coverage is enabled, we generate a tor binary called "tor-cov"
13:45:50 <nickm> that's supposed to be tor build with gcov support
13:45:52 <nickm> *built
13:46:08 <nickm> (no worries; you're welcome here)
13:46:10 <teor> yeah, I've had coverage working locally
13:46:31 <nickm> I tried making it go with chutney a month or two ago, and it didn't work for me.  I haven't had time to investigate why yet.
13:46:44 <teor> and chutney working locally
13:46:59 <teor> I always wondered how it would work together with multiple processes
13:50:01 <nickm> I thought gcov knows how to do locking as appropriate?   But tbh I don't actually know
13:52:41 <nickm> anyway, it's something I should look at
13:52:52 <nickm> along with all your chutney patches, and mvdan's, and the tor-related patches
13:52:56 <nickm> err
13:53:00 <nickm> the chutney-related tor patches
13:54:10 <teor> yes, and #13163, which is only related to chutney insofar as I discovered it using TestNetwork
14:00:51 <nickm> ok.  sounds like end-of-the-meeting to me.  Thanks, everyone!
14:00:54 <nickm> #endmeeting