17:00:02 #startmeeting DC26 orga team meeting. https://deb.li/dc26meet 17:00:02 Meeting started Tue Jan 27 17:00:02 2026 UTC. The chair is pwaring. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:02 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 17:00:04 #topic Roll call 17:00:06 as always, say hi if you're here 17:00:07 Hello #first :o) 17:00:31 hi!! Not first 17:01:09 Hello 17:01:11 hello 17:01:53 Hola (sort of) 17:02:15 o/ 17:02:22 \o 17:03:05 #topic DC25: Videos 17:03:42 Hola! o/ 17:05:30 do we need to say anything on videos from DC25? or take this off future agendas? 17:05:32 same as before, let's move on 17:05:39 k 17:05:48 #topic DC25: Academic track 17:06:17 It's done! \o/ 17:06:31 We finally got word from the... What's the name of the administrator for HAL? 17:06:41 anyway, all of our 10 papers are online 17:06:42 🎉 17:07:02 https://hal.science/DEBCONF/browse/latest-publications 17:07:05 great! 17:07:17 And thanks to terceiro, all relevant DebConf talks link to their respective papers. 17:07:54 o/ 17:07:59 delayed hello 17:08:19 great, I'll take this off future agendas :) 17:08:24 that's everything on DC25 17:08:25 :-D Finally! 17:08:29 #topic DC26: Sponsors 17:10:05 We need to ping sponsors, both uncontacted leads and round 1 re-pings 17:10:12 any help appreciated 17:10:53 otherwise the uptake is slow but steady 17:11:36 #topic DC26: Bursaries and visas 17:12:03 I think there is not much to say at this point... 17:12:11 last time we said we would leave this until the university resumed work 17:12:20 which I think isn't until the next meeting 17:12:24 Right, but I understand that will be in February 17:12:26 yes 17:12:33 #topic DC26: Registration 17:12:54 Sorry.. Joined late 17:13:01 We had the “important date” of yesterday for opening registration 17:13:03 sorry, I have not got things moving, technically 17:13:26 however, the Local Team requested some extra day (1 or 2 weeks) to iron some details out. 17:13:36 So, we are targetting February 2 or 9 17:13:48 update the important dates page? 17:13:59 yes, we should --- but with which value? 17:14:03 (@locals ?) 17:14:07 yes, after we decide if we move to 2 or 9 17:14:11 if you're unsure, say the 9th 17:14:14 (and I'd do 9th, nobody will complain when we open early) 17:14:22 I understand the answer depends (also) on the bursaries team 17:14:25 yeah, better to surprise positively than disappoint 17:14:25 gwolf: fewer questions to answer 17:14:34 santiago: yes 17:14:37 santiago: the Bursaries team will always want to start earlier 17:14:42 how much registration are we expecting to be able to open? 17:14:47 But it will yield to reality as much as needed 17:14:57 do we have the prices etc. to start everything? 17:15:20 the local team wanted to be sure that the delayed opening doesn't have a strong negative impact in the workflows 17:15:24 tumbleweed: I told the team a bit earlier that we can even open registration if some details are missing 17:15:46 it's not ideal, but i.e. regarding shirt sizes --- we have months to tell people to triple-check their size is right. 17:15:58 yeah, that's easy to ask people to check later 17:16:24 people have to validate their registration choices anyway for registration confirmation 17:16:46 are we expecting to have final prices for food and accommodation by next week? 17:17:47 * gwolf reads some cricket-like line noise... 17:18:22 shall we say open registration by the next meeting? (10th February) 17:18:24 as an aim 17:19:02 pwaring: I understand the local team can commit to it 17:19:16 yes It's a good date 17:19:22 ok let's go with that then 17:19:24 pwaring: again, the discussion was whether we'd be able to open on Feb 2 or 9 17:19:45 any objection to open on Feb 9? 17:19:56 but, we didn't hear the opinion from bursarie team 17:20:13 utkarsh2102: ^^ 17:20:33 o/ 17:20:38 bursaries will be fine, that team takes the data to process by May 1st 17:20:52 and you can guess it won't start in Feb :) 17:20:54 that’ll be fab, yes 17:20:54 o/ utkarsh2102 17:21:37 i had said april earlier if we can still follow that timeline. 17:21:45 but i guess we won’t be ready by then? 17:23:52 so we are ok 17:24:07 yes, we can move on now I think 17:24:12 #topic Health policy 17:24:22 a proposed draft policy is online 17:24:23 Health policy 17:24:27 https://pad.debian.net/p/debconf-covid-policy 17:24:50 (general health policy despite the pad URL) 17:25:26 I see we have some feedback at the bottom 17:26:50 there was some on the mailing list as well 17:27:02 Regarding the feedback: 1- No, this is not a set of recommendations coming from doctors or the OMS (WHO) 17:27:28 It is inspired by our (debconf-ctte) experience and our best intent 17:27:52 Re: vaccination → We are saying that people SHOULD (not MUST) be vaccinated. We are not turning anybody away if they are not 17:28:02 also we can't really check 17:28:10 so we cannot assume people are immune 17:28:21 (also, vaccination lowers the risk, but is not a silver bullet) 17:29:13 if we adopt this, I assume we drop our covid19 vaccination page from registration 17:29:33 and instead add a mention of the health policy to our coc approval checkbox 17:29:44 tumbleweed: and replace it with "I read and understand the health policy?" 17:29:50 ah yes, there 17:30:15 one checkbox for both is nice and simple 17:30:26 ack 17:30:47 especially as you can't agree to one and not the other 17:30:56 (I assume!) 17:31:17 yeah, we don't want people playing those games 17:31:34 right! 17:32:02 anything else we need to say on health policy at this point? 17:32:13 shall we agree to adopt it? 17:32:29 kudos for the health policy 17:32:47 is everyone in favour of adopting it? 17:33:01 * gwolf raises hand enthusiastly 17:33:04 +1 17:33:14 * lenharo[m] agree with the policy 17:33:30 yes please 17:33:33 +1 17:33:45 #agreed health policy adopted 17:33:56 #topic Meeting schedule 17:34:09 next meeting, as mentioned previously, is 10th February, 17:00 UTC as usual 17:34:12 #topic AOB 17:34:14 anything else before we finish? 17:35:51 ok, thanks everyone for coming and see you in two weeks! 17:35:53 #endmeeting