17:00:06 #startmeeting DC25 orga team meeting. Agenda: https://deb.li/dc25meet 17:00:06 Meeting started Tue Mar 4 17:00:06 2025 UTC. The chair is pwaring. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:06 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 17:00:07 #topic Roll call 17:00:10 as always, say hi if you're here 17:00:48 hi! 17:00:52 Hi 17:01:03 hi 17:01:05 o/ 17:01:10 o/ ! 17:01:17 hola 17:01:20 o/ 17:01:24 O/ 17:01:49 Hi 17:01:53 \o 17:02:45 Hi (Japan Team) 17:03:06 #topic DC25: Sponsors & Fundraising 17:03:18 anything to update on this? I think we may have had one extra sponsor since last weke? 17:03:49 yes, a second Frenche one \o/ 17:03:50 two supporters, maybe? 17:03:56 one Plat, one Bronze now 17:03:58 😃 17:03:58 and one bronze 17:04:07 \o/ 17:04:13 * gwolf prepares to swim in a pool of gold coins 17:04:29 of bitcoins 17:04:43 santiago: Don't burst my baloon... 17:05:12 well he can swim in the gold coins until you bring them to the caterer :D 17:05:22 gwolf, do you prefer $libras? 17:05:24 anything else on sponsors? 17:05:48 we are still spamming 17:05:55 and we need more 17:06:10 DLange: Well, but we wanted to be a Michelin-listed DebConf! 17:06:27 local team please contact EDF and anybody else large in France using Debian 17:06:44 we can try a few moonshots to their generic marketing email adresses 17:07:02 #topic DC25: Budget 17:07:30 An updated budget is available in the budgeting-01 branch 17:07:58 is there a reason you don't merge it to main? 17:08:17 for now, we are capping food + accommodation bursaries to 100 people 17:08:29 DLange, I think it is ready to get merged now 17:08:32 so, you're modelling a loss of EUR 4,577.31 17:08:40 tumbleweed, so far, yes 17:08:43 with expected expenses of EUR 318,152.31 17:08:58 with the current sponsors, but hopefully we will get more 17:08:59 We’re obviously expecting more sponsors to come 17:09:11 the public sponsors are really slow because of bureaucracy 17:09:26 OK, so if we raise more sponsorship, we could possibly raise the cap on food and accommodation bursaries 17:09:28 but we’ve stayed very conservative in the money we get from sponsors in the estimate 17:09:28 and probably there will be income from beer 17:09:35 more sponsorship => more bursaries 17:09:49 sounds good 17:09:58 and year, DLange, obviously we have contacted big companies 17:10:03 yeah* 17:10:11 and EDF is on the roadmap 17:10:31 oki, map faster 17:10:34 they are slow, too 17:10:39 how many attendees is this budget assuming? 17:11:21 tumbleweed, 400 attendees 17:11:47 and worst case is what, 250? 17:12:03 do we have a venue limit? 17:12:19 250 is a worse case scenario, yes 17:12:51 and it still mostly balances with 250? 17:12:53 ...and beer can be sold at the price we decide to -- not that we want to seel €5 beers, but we can adjust the knobs to collect more from it 17:14:04 venue limit is a bit above 400 17:14:34 thanks 17:14:57 gwolf: it’ll be hard to go below €5 for pints in France, except if we have bad pills 17:15:01 tumbleweed, according to the "internal" spreadsheet, we would have a loss of ~7K€ for 250 attendees 17:15:17 sounds absolutely fine! 17:15:22 and with the current sponsors 17:15:27 bensmrs: ouch, I was shooting at an implausibly high value :-) 17:15:42 that’s a bargain in France… 17:16:02 is there anything else we need to say on budget at this point 17:16:02 this will be a wine conf :-) 17:16:04 But we are going to Bretagne 17:16:21 Everything is getting expensive here… 17:16:24 anyway, /me shuts up... 17:16:24 we're going to probably be limited on food and accommodation bursaries 17:16:33 so we should probably encourage people to self-fund as much as possible 17:16:43 tumbleweed, thanks for highlighting that 17:16:52 Anyway, a loss of 7k€ does not seem as dire as what we discussed last meeting 17:17:03 #info bursaries will be limited at current budget so self-funding needs to be encouraged 17:17:09 yeah, I think that's totally workable 17:17:22 you should land it and submit it to the DPL 17:17:31 I think some sections of the budget are still quite boilerplate 17:17:43 we need to push hard to let everybody know that we are not swimming in a pool of golden coins 17:17:49 (e.g. I thumbsucked some team travel numbers for modelling, and I saw you had them copied from last year) 17:18:04 but we can figure those out in rev 2 17:18:14 indeed, I need to discuss those figures with the different teams 17:18:34 may be we can ask the teams to reduce to the necessary people 17:18:40 ok, let's review the budget again next meeting when there's been a bit more discussion on the details 17:18:42 santiago: of course. But a loss of €300K is way worse than a loss of €7K, and it *feels like* a pool of gold coins. 17:18:48 this seems a good time to pick up that discussion from last year again 17:19:14 I wouldn't want to block budget v1 approval on that though 17:19:25 let's get registration open in parallel with unpicking this 17:19:42 May I send this budget for approval then? 17:19:50 well, if you won't block budget approval, the discussion will not have any results 17:20:01 of course all teams want to fly everybody on that team 17:20:06 it's our friends... 17:21:16 then cut the numbers low for v1 17:21:24 and teams can fight for increases in v2 17:22:02 tumbleweed, thanks for your help on this 17:22:33 that sounds good, tumbleweed 17:22:48 #action Local team to submit budget v1 for approval 17:23:11 (for context, in previous years we've submitted budgets around this time, then revised several times) 17:23:30 #topic DC25: Registration: Zammad 17:23:35 Yes, it was true. 17:23:54 tumbleweed / nattie: do you want to say anyting on Zammad? 17:24:00 help.debconf.org is alive 17:24:04 it exists 17:24:05 and receiving a fair amount of spam :P 17:24:25 there are registration and visa queues in it 17:24:33 if other teams want, we can include them too 17:24:33 registration gets a lot of spam, it's just more noticeable with a ticketing system 17:25:04 #info Zammad is available 17:25:10 #link https://help.debconf.org 17:25:31 any questions on Zammad before we move on? 17:25:47 * gwolf shivers at yet another RT 17:26:09 (but I'll be just a user, and if it helps set up queues for organizing our teams' work... I'm more than happy with that!) 17:26:15 #topic DC25: Registration: Visas 17:26:30 #link https://debconf25.debconf.org/about/visas/ 17:27:25 are we having any kind of visa team this year? (I don't know how much we can help applicants, beyond answering questions) 17:28:00 Is there a system that has changed compared to last year? 17:28:07 we need to set the team up 17:28:16 Giyeonbang[m]: yes 17:28:26 tumbleweed: AFAICT, we might need to help and follow up, yes... 17:28:42 ...Schengen visas are tough for some nationalities, and invitations will be requested and so on 17:28:52 i guess we should encourage people early and often to check what they need from the visa wizard 17:29:00 maybe less bureaucratic than India and Korea, but we will surely need to help some people. 17:29:13 so yeah, we need to form a team then 17:29:17 and get them added in zammad 17:30:10 can we link to the visa wizard from the DC25 visa page to start with? that way we'd have something to point people at 17:30:28 yeah that’s the most relevant resource 17:30:49 if there’s any question, the visa team will first use the visa wizard, actually 17:31:05 pwaring: yeah, we should do that 17:31:13 Good. 17:31:22 we should mention it when we announce the opening of registration 17:31:32 #action Local team to link to visa wizard from DC25 visa page 17:31:41 visa team uses the visa wizard to help the people who the visa wizard doesnt help with? 17:31:58 anything else on visas at this point? 17:32:02 (I am off for a bit --- have a concurrent RL meeting) 17:32:03 (we've still got a few things to cover) 17:32:25 disaster2life[mds]: well, we won’t know *more* than the official procedure… 17:33:19 #topic DC25: Registration: Features required for registration 17:33:29 this was on the agenda with a question mark so I'm not sure what it refers to 17:33:39 so, what's blocking us opening registration? 17:33:44 Well we need wafer to support several room types 17:33:52 with different prices 17:33:53 it does 17:34:02 ok fine then ^^ 17:34:11 bensmrs: reasonable really, _/me grumbles about no internal dark side french visa procedures_ 17:34:22 but obviously we'll need to ensure that we have availability of what people are registering 17:34:44 we need to keep an eye on the numbers to avoid over-selling 17:35:22 does wafer now have the ability to close paid registrations off? 17:35:31 yes 17:35:38 disaster2life[mds]: nah unfortunately. Don’t hesitate to ping me tho if you have any question before there’s an official visa team. 17:36:01 but we don't have any kind of automatic limits on room types 17:36:17 so someone would have to monitor and shut it odd? 17:36:27 yeah 17:37:23 bensmrs: thank you, ill keep you on my hot dial :*) 17:37:45 any other registration features we need to discuss? 17:37:58 tumbleweed: noted, so periodic checks would be nice then 17:38:09 let's configure the pricing from this budget and let people test things out on wafertest 17:38:15 I'll do that after this meeting 17:39:02 nice, I’ll make myself available, should you want to discuss the different room types (we have lots of them unfortunately) 17:39:17 okay great 17:39:23 thanks for your hard work as always tumbleweed 17:39:31 #topic DC25: Registration: Timeline 17:39:40 shall we try to pin down a timeline? 17:39:43 yes 17:39:48 yes 17:39:49 we need a budget approved 17:39:58 I'd assume we can get that within about a week, but DPLs get busy too... 17:40:13 (preparing the budget approval email right now) 17:40:47 so, should we assume that we're opening in a week? 17:41:22 or two 17:41:30 when do we close bursary applications? 17:41:40 https://debconf25.debconf.org/schedule/important-dates/ has a blank date in may 17:41:47 three weeks later should be fine 17:41:49 this could probably be pulled forward to April 17:41:55 two weeks is a bit a stretch for people 17:42:05 yeah, I think 3 weeks is a good minimum 17:42:15 and it's about long enough for the bursary team to constitute itself 17:42:17 we can always extend, but not contract 17:42:28 utkarsh2102^ courtesy highlight, work coming up 17:43:11 we'll need to ask the bursary team for their expected approval timeline 17:43:13 2024 we sent out bursary confirmations in MAy 17:43:20 but typically that's 2-3 weeks for review and ranking 17:43:40 (end of May) 17:43:42 three weeks should be fine™ 17:43:45 if you have any deadlines for swag orders, we should get these into important-dates too 17:44:03 and accommadtion booking deadlines etc 17:44:10 #action Bursary time to decide on expected approval timeline 17:44:31 anything else on timelines? 17:45:36 will someone take an action to get it onto the website? 17:45:42 (defined and onto the website) 17:46:00 Bursary responses may be needed for visas 17:46:03 order deadlines? 17:46:06 has the discussion to shorten DebCamp or not been concluded? 17:46:09 because plane tickets are needed for visas 17:46:26 I was traveling so I did not follow IRC / lists much 17:46:29 (and a justification that you are wealthy enough to live in France for the period) 17:47:11 that ones gonna be a pain :-/ 17:47:20 * gwolf is bck 17:47:28 (short RL meeting after all :-) ) 17:47:32 <_rene_> it is no difference to any past debconf in Schengen 17:47:51 yeah, Schengen visas are a pain in that regard 17:47:53 <_rene_> unless the french are actually far more strict in Schengen visa then e.g. Germany :) 17:48:05 <_rene_> (where you also have to do that) 17:48:08 raising the question again: Will anyone take the action to figure out and document the registration timeline? 17:48:23 Well the Govt needs proof that you’ll travel back, and proof that you won’t live in the streets 17:48:40 <_rene_> yup 17:49:14 <_rene_> or disappear and overstay until infinity (I am deliberately not saying "staying illegaly") 17:49:39 _rene_: unsure but isnt schengen supposed to unify the requirements too? 17:50:06 tumbleweed: can we put that action onto 'local team'? 17:50:11 <_rene_> disaster2life[mds]: I don't need one I am a citizen of a Schengen member :) 17:50:13 _rene_: "overstaying your visa" is a phrase i think works 17:50:20 (ideally an individual would be actioned) 17:50:28 pwaring: Ideally a person, but sure 17:50:30 <_rene_> but I can imagine the rules being the same but person a, b or c more strict 17:50:31 _rene_, disaster2life[mds]: maybe not the right moment to have this discussion? 17:50:32 I can take that action 17:50:55 thanks 17:50:59 olasd: yup, apologies 17:51:11 #action santiago to work out and document registration timeline 17:51:15 let's try mine again: has the discussion to shorten DebCamp or not been concluded? 17:51:19 <_rene_> olasd: yup, sorry 17:51:33 DLange, we haven't considered shortening DebCamp 17:51:55 ok, thank you, I read it as an option to save cost somewhere 17:51:56 anything else on DC25? 17:52:12 pwaring, not for the moment 17:52:16 great 17:52:20 #topic DC26: Bids 17:52:22 DLange: We were considering it last week as we panicked at the budget 17:52:39 (I suggested it, there was no real consideration AFAICT) 17:52:55 (what about the DC25 CfP, did that go out yet?) 17:53:00 https://wiki.debian.org/DebConf/26/Bids 17:53:26 there are still 3 bids, though I think we've only heard about Japan + Argentina recently 17:53:30 azeem, that is a question for content team: gwolf, kanashiro, tassia[mds] ^ 17:53:40 It didn't go out yet 17:53:56 FWIW I think many of us have been kept too busy :-( I haven't had any cycles to spare 17:54:01 pwaring: dont believe thailand is happening 17:54:01 gwolf: thanks! 17:54:18 There is this idea of this academic track, with which I am in principle 100% in favor, but... 17:54:32 I might poke at josh again maybe 17:54:36 ...I think I can now publicly doubt it can be implemented in practice, as we have delayed things for too long 17:54:49 sorry for being too late, we've now moved on to DC26 17:55:12 disaster2life[mds]: wait, DC26? Weren't we ... Ah, sorry! pwaring, please add a topic on Content Team later!) 17:55:45 disaster2life[mds]: FWIW I am not talking as a DC-Committee member here, as I'm excusing from the role as I'm presenting Argentina... 17:55:45 gwolf: I have added it to the agenda for next tme 17:56:18 ...but AFAICT, the Thailand bid didn't participate at any point in this round, only in the original presentations at Korea 17:56:31 is there anything we need to say / discuss / decide on DC26 bids, given that a winner hasn't been chosen? 17:56:33 I pinged Josh around January and got no reply 17:56:41 Thailand haven't updated their bid page since November 2024 17:56:46 pwaring: We want a winner to be chosen ;-) 17:57:13 yup, I believe the bid was in the heat of the moment, but pretty sure it wont pull through, ill try contacting and cross it out if I dont get a follow up? 17:58:06 disaster2life[mds]: They were contacted already in time. 17:58:23 We had a first IRC meeting, and they didn't show up. 17:58:26 We haven't taken a vote, but I think the general consensus within the committee in the moment is that the Argentina bid is the stronger option rigth now 17:58:55 Japan's split venue is definitely a complication 17:59:13 But the team did a good job on getting its costs down to reasonable levels 17:59:18 We Japan team updated the Venue for using same place after last meeting. 17:59:19 gwolf: indeed, just wanted to consider if we should ping them again or cross them off the list now- 17:59:47 ok, if there's no decision to be made here then we can move on 17:59:49 TakanoriSuzuki[m]: ah, I missed that 18:00:02 #topic DC26: Schedule 18:00:13 disaster2life[mds]: I think that if anybody has to reach out, it has to be the Committee directly 18:00:17 The negotiations aren't certain yet, though. 18:00:17 can we discuss anything schedule-related without a confirmed winning bid 18:00:20 We developed a proposal with one venue. 18:00:54 tumbleweed++ ; I'm sure that if Argentina gets chosen for DC26, Japan can present a killer DC27 proposal! 18:01:08 gwolf (IRC) yes probably- 18:01:19 or the other way around gwolf :) 18:01:24 #topic Meeting schedule 18:01:24 I would hope so too. Both bids are DebConfs I want to go to 18:01:37 DLange: right, but as I'm talking ex-cathedra, let me light my side of the street ;-) 18:02:02 next meetings will be 11th March and 18th March, 17:00 UTC as usual (still weekly for now) 18:02:11 #topic AOB 18:02:12 tumbleweed: We could have a split, with DebCamp in Japan and DebConf in Argentina or so! ;-) 18:02:14 anything else before we finish 18:02:25 With the cost situation it had looked like we would be able to reach a decision without a vote 18:02:37 but it seems like we should take one now 18:02:56 but... we need to get more of the committee to a meeting for that 18:03:08 currently there's just gwolf (abstein) nattie and me here 18:03:22 that's quorum :) 18:03:24 pwaring, please, don't forget the Content team topic 18:03:34 santiago: it is on the next agenda 18:03:35 tumbleweed: Maybe there can be an #action for the committee deciding soon? 18:03:49 (although people can add things to the agenda as well - please do so if there's something missing!) 18:03:52 Please check the Japanese proposals in one place and compare them. 18:03:53 yeah, let's take an action to decide between now and the end of next meeting 18:03:55 i.e. within a given timeframe? 18:04:23 #action committee to decide DC26 winning bid by 17:00 UTC 11th March 18:04:33 anything else before we finish 18:04:51 s/17:00/18:00/ we could vote in the meeting 18:05:05 #undo 18:05:06 Removing item from minutes: 18:05:18 #action committee to decide DC26 winning bid in the next meeting (11th March) 18:05:24 super, thanks for the highlight, bursary team will be ready by then. 18:05:28 tumbleweed: I strongly suggest to vote before the meeting... Maybe announce during the meeting. But anyway :-) 18:06:41 ok, thanks everyone for coming and see you next week! 18:06:44 #endmeeting