14:00:00 #startmeeting Measurement Team meeting 14:00:00 Meeting started Wed Sep 9 14:00:00 2015 UTC. The chair is karsten. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:00:07 hi. who's here for the meeting? 14:01:48 quick. in a few minutes I'll give the channel back to asn_ and dgoulet. ;) 14:02:45 here for measurement meeting ;) 14:02:48 hi! 14:02:55 hi clv! 14:03:11 that reminds me of the ticket you mentioned earlier.. 14:03:45 04:13 #tor-dev: < clv> karsten: i have a couple of fixes for #16962 ... i'm not sure which one fits better for what is needed 14:03:53 what fixes do you have? 14:04:12 (if you're okay with talking about it now while we wait for other folks.) 14:05:11 https://github.com/leivaburto/globe <- branches task-16962 and task-16962b 14:05:46 the first one shows alleged family and effective family in separated fields 14:06:02 the second merges them and keeps showing them as family 14:06:24 neat. the second version is what I had in mind as simple fix. 14:06:34 but making a distinction would be even better. 14:06:56 alright 14:07:02 what do you think about displaying them in one list but change color (or something) for alleged vs. effective? 14:07:40 yeah, i think it's possible 14:07:47 is important to make the difference? 14:07:55 that was my doubt in the first place 14:07:56 useful, yes. 14:08:01 okey 14:08:07 because operators will notice when their settings are (partly) ineffective. 14:08:23 tomlurge: here for the meeting? :) 14:08:40 yep. hi! 14:08:48 hi! 14:09:07 hi! 14:09:13 clv: thanks for working on that ticket! 14:09:30 clv: btw, did you see anything obviously wrong in the atlas patch? 14:09:49 #16961 14:10:27 (we really need to talk about focusing on either globe or atlas, to avoid having two tickets per onionoo change..) 14:10:47 while we talk about this, let's make an agenda for today. 14:11:00 * karsten suggests a few things: 14:11:13 1) updated measurement roadmap 14:11:20 2) 1-1-1 task exchange 14:11:34 3) switch from wed 14 utc to thu 14 utc 14:11:52 clv, tomlurge: please add more topics 14:12:06 any dev mtg preparations maybe? 14:12:26 4) dev mtg preparations 14:12:29 hi Sebastian! 14:12:40 hi 14:13:03 status reports of what we are working on? 14:13:15 0) status reports 14:14:11 okay, sounds like a fine plan. 14:14:18 let's start with 14:14:21 14:13:51 < karsten> 0) status reports 14:14:46 what have you been working on since last week? who wants to go first? 14:15:07 nothing for me in this space, sorry. I'll drop in later, holler if you need me 14:15:53 maybe I start? 14:15:57 please do! 14:16:07 (sounds good, Sebastian.) 14:16:24 I really really finished the map reduce job (ironed out a mean bug in a double loop). now need to get that fine data on the screen. settled for Backbone.js as webframework. now need to get the pieces together: MongoDb, D3, Node, Backbone…Going in circles on that… 14:16:43 congrats! 14:17:04 thanks :) even the documentation is halfway decent! 14:17:21 very curious to see the result! 14:17:37 ha haar… 14:17:52 nice 14:17:59 so you didn't go for angular at the end 14:18:00 if you have something to try out for these folks, please share a link. now or next week or ... 14:18:29 * qbi is in the car. Will read backlog later. 14:18:44 hi qbi! drive safely! ;) 14:18:54 jo 14:18:57 :) 14:19:09 clv: no, i figured that my view logic is repetitive but very simple, so backbon eshould do it. plus it’s nearer to the metal so helps me improve my javascript skills 14:19:58 karsten: I’m afraid I’ll be lucky if I have something interesting for the dev meeting 14:20:31 make it tiny tiny, but it gets so much more real once that exists. :) 14:20:55 tomlurge: i need to improve my JS skills too, so let me know if i can help you with something 14:21:37 cool. collaboration! :) 14:21:46 karsten: yeah, definitely. but it’s hard to get all the pieces connected even for a toiny start. i’m really struggling with that. 14:21:59 cvl: thanks!!! 14:22:18 true. 14:22:26 anything else you did since last week, tomlurge? 14:22:32 and want to report here? 14:22:57 nope. especially didn’t work on the Tor Measurement Tools Roadmap :( 14:23:06 ah, no worries. 14:23:21 clv: want to go next, or should I go first? 14:23:35 i'll go ;) 14:23:40 great! 14:24:40 i've been working on erebus (SoP project) and did a fix for #16962 .. so i learned how to use and code on globe :D 14:25:16 by the way, did you manage to build globe? 14:25:52 I mean, you probably did, unless you tried out your changes somehow without building it.. 14:25:56 on vagrant.. no, but on my system, with grunt and node, yes 14:26:01 ah ok. 14:26:07 any trouble with vagrant, or did you not try? 14:26:17 I'm asking because isis had trouble with that a while back. 14:26:49 yes i had problems 14:27:12 would you want to create a ticket for those? 14:27:35 the /vagrant folder was empty when i logged into the virtual machine 14:27:41 no need to fix them, but it would be good to write them down somewhere so that somebody can fix them. 14:27:48 oh. 14:27:57 i'm not sure if it was a problem on my machine (vbguest additions or something like that) 14:28:25 we should try to figure that out. ticket? 14:28:57 (I'm very carful not mess up my local configuration until we have a fix.) 14:28:57 alright, sounds good 14:29:05 thanks! 14:29:31 anything else to report? 14:30:02 well, and using globe made me notice that there is some very useful information i could later include on erebus... 14:30:18 heh. nice! 14:30:21 so, it was a learning week :) 14:30:26 that's all 14:30:52 is erebus going to contact onionoo, or is that information that's already available from the local/remote tor? 14:31:40 both 14:32:20 ok :) 14:32:27 so, what did I do since last week.. 14:32:53 I had some good discussions with atagar. one was about distinguishing between relay and bridge descriptors in metrics-lib. 14:33:05 I created #17000 for that. 14:33:33 I also moved the result of one of the last 1-1-1 task exchange sessions to tor-dev@ 14:33:39 subject "Let's identify which measurement-related tools need work when relays switch from RSA identities to ed25519 identities" 14:33:45 thanks for that 14:33:54 sure, thanks for asking the question. 14:34:07 now I need to handle replies. 14:34:25 and today I worked on the roadmap and made that more useful, I think. 14:34:47 that's all. I'll tell you more about the roadmap under 1). 14:34:52 14:11:49 < karsten> 1) updated measurement roadmap 14:35:05 (unless we missed someone in the status updates?) 14:35:29 (please shout if we did!) 14:35:32 so, 14:35:32 https://people.torproject.org/~karsten/volatile/measurement-roadmap.pdf 14:35:52 I changed the document structure a bit. 14:36:05 and added more details to existing products. 14:36:33 much of that is based on discussions with folks like atagar, iwakeh, ln5. 14:36:45 huh! I’m in the center of it all =8-[ 14:37:11 that doc is far from being done, but I hope that it will be useful in berlin. 14:37:37 my guess is that we'll still improve it in berlin. 14:38:01 tomlurge: you're right! not easy to reduce overlap between arrows. ;) 14:38:20 erebus is on that doc :D 14:38:33 my plan is to add more details to sections 2 and 3 and then find a way to write something for 4. 14:38:50 clv: it is! though it is on the edge to network team just like nyx. 14:39:03 but it's good to include it here, I think. 14:39:25 yes, thnks! 14:39:51 so, I'm mentioning this here, because feedback is still much appreciated. 14:40:19 if people have a moment to read the doc and give feedback, that would be awesome! 14:40:47 ok, how about we move to 14:40:50 14:13:03 < karsten> 4) dev mtg preparations 14:41:31 two things come to mind here: 14:41:46 there will be a retrospective of the team idea. 14:42:12 it would be useful to think about what went well, what didn't go so well, and what we can do better. 14:42:59 I think we're going to talk about that stuff anyway, but if everyone thinks about it beforehand they might have better feedback. 14:43:23 karsten asked me to add a session about visualization to the meetings wiki. but I have to admit that I’m shy. I’d rather work on my code than send time and thought on preparung a session. 14:43:32 something else would be the roadmap. I'm thinking about printing out these diagrams in din a2 or so and bring them to berlin. 14:43:59 tomlurge: we can still announce that session if you feel like it's a good idea in berlin. 14:44:24 tomlurge: though it wouldn't hurt to secretly prepare something for a session just in case there will be one. 14:44:33 up to you, of course. 14:45:18 hmhm, okay. as soon as i get the visionion thong rolling that might loosen my creativity versus the session thing 14:45:43 I find your diagrams very helpful. good idea to print them out! 14:46:19 I'm stealing^Wre-using that idea from isabela who brought printed diagrams to the last meeting. ;) 14:46:46 what else can we do to make the meeting more useful? 14:46:51 all reative work is 90%+ stolen 14:47:02 reative === creative 14:47:14 We've been discussing locating plaintiffs to bring suit on the issue of Brad Spengler of GRSecurity once he closes his derivative work (with some new discussions): 14:47:17 https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=15/09/07/040206 http://pipedot.org/pipe/KPRX 14:47:20 http://8ch.net/tech/res/346860.html http://pipedot.org/pipe/K33M 14:47:23 If you've not been taught the law, don't try to debate the legal merits of the case and show yourself to be a lay fool, please. 14:47:44 to be honest, I didn't think much about preparing the berlin meeting yet. but I guess I'll think more about this in the next week or so. 14:47:55 what do others think? 14:48:18 karsten: I think if you're a linux kernel contrib you need to sue Brad Spengler. 14:48:52 where is Ciel? 14:49:00 if there is a Sebastian surely ther is a Ciel? 14:49:12 Sebastian: what did you do with/to Ciel? 14:49:17 should we move on with 14:49:23 14:11:57 < karsten> 2) 1-1-1 task exchange 14:49:25 ? 14:49:44 sounds good to me 14:49:53 anyone have anything for me? 14:50:05 https://etherpad.mozilla.org/O6TCKaTQ2j 14:50:38 let's collect new tasks. what do we have? 14:50:54 Sebastian: I totally failed to come up with new tasks this week. sorry. 14:51:04 me too 14:51:19 same here 14:51:28 but let's give it a few minutes, maybe something comes up. 14:52:27 i ws thinking on changing mine to something 'simpler' 14:52:34 i was* 14:52:38 sounds good. want to do that on the pad? 14:53:02 okey 14:53:39 oh hey, I have something 14:56:12 there, added to the pad. 14:56:51 great, we have two new tasks. 14:58:20 three. 14:58:30 tomlurge: feel free to undo my edit. 14:58:31 right! 14:58:43 karsten: no, that’s perfect 14:58:56 any takers for these three? 14:59:11 and while we all consider adopting a task, 14:59:16 14:12:10 < karsten> 3) switch from wed 14 utc to thu 14 utc 14:59:36 how about we switch to thursday, same time, to avoid the overlap with the tor meeting happening at 13:30 utc in #tor-dev? 14:59:43 THU is okay for me 15:00:08 we could even move to #tor-dev then! 15:00:21 no problem here 15:00:38 * karsten wonders if the doodle poll still exists.. 15:01:09 nope. :( 15:01:27 okay, let's try thursday 14:00 utc next week. 15:02:23 I think I'll give erebus a try if nobody else wants to do that. 15:03:14 taken. 15:03:17 awesome! thnks 15:03:32 good man! 15:03:59 clv: you really…? 15:04:14 yes! 15:04:24 I’m hunbled! 15:04:51 tomlurge: I think if you provide some more context on the task, the result is more likely useful. 15:05:11 I can easily see clv spending an hour trying out those pieces without producing something useful. 15:05:30 if you can write a few more sentences about that, you might be happier with the output. 15:05:43 like, via email later today or so. 15:05:56 right 15:05:57 clv: so, should I wait for you to tell me when you have updated the README? 15:06:12 yes, please wait my update 15:06:18 ok! 15:06:25 7 minutes over time. 15:06:30 we should end this meeting. 15:06:35 unless there's anything we must talk about? 15:07:15 3, 2, 1, ..... 15:07:17 #endmeeting