16:01:33 <GeKo> #startmeeting network-health 12/11/2023
16:01:33 <MeetBot> Meeting started Mon Dec 11 16:01:33 2023 UTC.  The chair is GeKo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:01:33 <MeetBot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
16:01:53 <GeKo> hiro: mattrighetti[m]: ^
16:01:59 <GeKo> not sure if ggus is around
16:02:19 <GeKo> we our pad as usual at: https://pad.riseup.net/p/tor-nethealthteam-2023-keep
16:02:25 <mattrighetti[m]> o/
16:03:23 <hiro> I am here sorry
16:03:26 <GeKo> mattrighetti[m]: i saw you filed those descriptorparser tickets today
16:03:29 <hiro> got caught in some issue
16:03:32 <GeKo> thanks for that
16:03:34 <GeKo> np
16:03:51 <GeKo> mattrighetti[m]: are you blocked on them in any eay?
16:03:53 <GeKo> *way
16:04:04 <mattrighetti[m]> GeKo: yep, I got some more coming actually
16:04:14 <hiro> I have to review those yet...
16:04:35 <mattrighetti[m]> Not actually blocked but the API atm is going to parse those as array of strings, if they're not then the api will return an emtpy array
16:04:59 <hiro> I see
16:05:04 <mattrighetti[m]> We should probably decide how to standardize that across all tables
16:05:23 <hiro> yeah... I need to check if those fields come all from the same document
16:05:32 <mattrighetti[m]> Well, if those are intended to be like that then I can edit my parsing logic ofc
16:06:18 <hiro> yeah let me have a look at all of them
16:06:26 <mattrighetti[m]> I have a draft MR with two new endpoints that should return weights_probability (guard, middle, exit fractions) and exit_addresses
16:06:36 <hiro> \o/ yay thanks for that
16:06:41 <GeKo> indeed!
16:06:51 <GeKo> mattrighetti[m]: and just keep those things filing
16:06:57 <GeKo> fine with different tickets
16:07:10 <hiro> yep it's allright
16:07:20 <mattrighetti[m]> I'll follow up with some questions on the MR, I have some questions on weights_probability
16:07:35 <hiro> ok sounds good
16:08:04 <mattrighetti[m]> Also, it could be a good idea to understand how clients are using those APIs so that we can make them better and more useful
16:08:24 <GeKo> yeah
16:08:41 <hiro> I thnk the demo was scheduled for this week allhands right?
16:08:47 <GeKo> i think that could be done with the help of the operator community as well
16:08:55 <hiro> we could start asking people if they want to start testing
16:09:05 <GeKo> asking for help and feeedback on tor-relays@
16:09:07 <GeKo> yeah
16:09:41 <GeKo> mattrighetti[m]: you could ask on that mailing list once you think we are ready for that feedback part
16:10:26 <hiro> yeah I'll send an email to pavel and start drafting a quick presentation for the demo
16:10:46 <mattrighetti[m]> yep was thinking the same, I'll try to finish the latest MR and then it could be useful to gather feedbacks
16:11:07 <hiro> @GeKo I was wondering if we should setup a topic on the forum just for the api
16:11:19 <GeKo> hrm!
16:11:26 <GeKo> we could do that
16:11:49 <GeKo> i am not much of a forum person but maybe a bunch of relay operators are
16:12:02 <hiro> once we open it up we could ask people to discuss there...
16:12:08 <GeKo> and the more different audiences we get the better
16:12:12 <GeKo> yeah, fine with me
16:12:20 <hiro> yeah I think I have to reset someting in my account  to have access again
16:12:24 <GeKo> mattrighetti[m]: sounds good!
16:12:41 <hiro> yes thanks @mattrighetti[m]
16:13:16 <mattrighetti[m]> Other than that the APIs look good, nothing more to add :)
16:13:25 <GeKo> nice
16:13:29 <hiro> it does indeed!
16:14:12 <GeKo> hiro: would it be worth putting the probably final revision of tor_fusion on your plate for this week?
16:14:21 <hiro> I think so
16:14:24 <hiro> let me add that
16:14:27 <GeKo> that way you might be done with that part of network-health/team#315
16:14:43 <GeKo> and don't have to worry about s112 o3.5 for a while
16:14:49 <GeKo> ugh
16:14:58 <juga> wrong issue number?
16:14:58 <GeKo> #313 it was
16:15:03 <juga> :)
16:15:11 <GeKo> :)
16:15:16 <GeKo> hiro: thanks
16:16:18 <GeKo> okay. all the other stuff looks good to me
16:16:35 <GeKo> do we have any questions/concerns/topics to discuss?
16:16:42 <GeKo> (additional ones, that is)
16:16:46 * juga is good
16:17:40 <GeKo> okay, nobody raises their virtual hand
16:17:55 <GeKo> then we are good to go it seems \o/
16:17:59 <GeKo> thanks everyone
16:18:02 <GeKo> #endmeeting