15:57:34 #startmeeting tor anti-censorship meeting 15:57:35 here is our meeting pad: https://pad.riseup.net/p/tor-anti-censorship-keep 15:57:35 feel free to add what you've been working on and put items on the agenda 15:57:35 Meeting started Thu Nov 2 15:57:34 2023 UTC. The chair is shelikhoo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:57:35 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 15:57:43 Hi! 15:57:44 hello! 15:57:53 hi 15:58:44 I think the meetbot's time drift is becoming increasing noticeable 16:00:08 dcf: encapsulation.ReadData will no longer be used in udplike transport communication protocol design. I see you are working on improving it, so just let you know 16:00:44 dcf1: encapsulation.ReadData will no longer be used in udplike transport communication protocol design. I see you are working on improving it, so just let you know 16:02:52 okay I see no change in the pad, let begin the meeting 16:03:27 the first topic is that whether we wants to move to a private read writable and publicly read only pad 16:03:49 as there was an increase of vandalism on the meeting pad 16:06:14 any discussion on this topic? 16:06:31 I didn't see any reply.... 16:06:36 sorry typing 16:06:37 do you have in mind what to use for that, and how requesting access would work? 16:06:49 ^ basically my question 16:07:52 I guess there was one of the Hackweek topics that was maybe looking into a different platform 16:07:55 let me find the issue 16:08:18 I think we can continue to use the riseup pad for now with a private pad name, with read only access provided with a proxy to url like https://pad.riseup.net/p/tor-anti-censorship-keep/export/txt 16:08:42 and the proxy only forward the content, but does not show the url itself 16:08:53 thus providing a read only access 16:09:18 I think this is the issue: https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/community/hackweek/-/issues/16 16:09:19 though I don't know if anyone will have time to work on it 16:09:21 and the access can be requested during meeting, and the link will be just pmed 16:09:45 I think this should be good enough to prevent vandalism 16:10:20 we could wait until the hackweek is over 16:10:44 and see if we decided to move to a platform that does provide readonly access function 16:10:47 I am not sure but cryptpad may also provide read-only access with edit access to authenticated people 16:10:54 okay cool, as long as the barrier isn't too painful for new people who may want to join i'm good with this 16:10:55 I would have to look into it a bit more 16:11:29 yeah, if the read only access is already there, we won't need to invent anything 16:12:47 so maybe we could just discuss this again in the next meeting, and see if there is a new platform chosen during hackweek 16:13:01 sounds good 16:13:21 I'll also take a few minutes to look into cryptpad and can make note of this particular issue on the hackweek issue 16:13:24 so it's on people's radar 16:13:43 yes, thanks onyinyang[m]! 16:14:09 I didn't see any other topics 16:14:19 and we have a reading group in next week 16:14:28 during hackweek, is that correct? 16:15:03 yes 16:15:56 yes, nice! I didn't see any other discussion topic... anything more we would like to discuss in this meeting? 16:18:06 not from me 16:18:07 nothing from me 16:18:32 okay, then let's end the meeting here! thanks everyone! 16:18:36 #endmeeting