15:59:32 #startmeeting network-health 11/09/2022 15:59:32 Meeting started Mon Nov 7 15:59:32 2022 UTC. The chair is GeKo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:59:32 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 15:59:47 alright, let's see who is actually around today :) 15:59:54 juga maybe 16:00:00 and maybe ggus as well? 16:00:35 hey 16:00:40 o/ 16:01:09 hi! 16:02:23 ggus: do you have anything to chat about? 16:02:53 should we sync a bit about our soto slides/talks? 16:03:18 yes, and another two topics: the next tor relay operator 16:04:12 and the evaluation criteria sponsor112 - https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/community/relays/-/issues/51 16:04:41 ggus: i wonder if we should talk about sponsor112 in our bbb sync tomorrow? 16:05:21 the nethealth meeting on irc has usually only a s112 part in those weeks where we don't have the bbb sync... 16:05:27 but i am fine either way 16:06:19 GeKo: what time is this sync? 16:06:41 we said 1800utc 16:07:22 every first tue of the month 16:07:40 like we have the s61 bbb sync every first monday of the month 16:08:01 (unless we need to move it for reasons) 16:08:14 i think tomorrow i have a meeting with S30 at the same time 16:08:29 :( 16:10:37 okay, so for the soto part i currently have 16:11:03 - talking a bit about malicious relays, linking to our blog post earlier this year and that https-only mode landed in 11.5 16:11:15 - eol work this year 16:11:36 - performance (s61) related things (over load of relays etc.) 16:11:54 then for 2023 i plan to explain a bit our s112 project 16:11:57 that's it 16:12:08 * juga wasn't having Internet 16:12:17 welcome! 16:12:20 thx 16:14:14 GeKo: looks good! 16:14:40 GeKo: i'm including about the tor relays meetup 16:15:10 and i'll mention about s112 community work in 2023 16:15:50 sound good 16:16:00 *sounds 16:18:53 ggus: so, what about the next tor relay operator meetup? 16:19:00 should we draft an agenda? 16:19:53 GeKo: yes, i'm opening a pad for that. i remember you mentioning about the dos 16:20:25 right. we could put a stronger focus on that topic for the next meetup 16:21:01 i need to think a bit hard whether we want to do that, though, given that things improved considerably last week 16:21:38 https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/community/relays/-/issues/52 16:21:54 and we might be behind with a bunch of our initiatives (like the iptables thing) 16:22:08 but we should bring the dos situation up either way 16:24:31 ok! 16:25:37 so for s112 what do you have in mind? 16:25:46 should we do voice at some point? 16:25:54 or is there something i should read up on? 16:25:56 or...? 16:27:22 GeKo: let's discuss a little bit here today, then we can think more about this later this week 16:27:53 so, we have this: https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/network-health/team/-/issues/267 16:28:10 we have the document 'expectations for relay operators' 16:28:15 which is good 16:28:29 https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/community/team/-/wikis/Expectations-for-Relay-Operators 16:28:56 right 16:29:06 but we don't have any criteria for 'sucess of solutions' 16:29:38 *success 16:30:15 i've not the proposal infront of me but we did not specify anything for drl in it? 16:30:39 GeKo: no, we're the ones to build that criteria 16:30:45 that *will 16:30:46 i see 16:30:49 okay 16:31:25 do you have started a pad or something where we could collaborate and do some brainstorming? 16:31:59 i have that ticket open, but i can create a pad too 16:32:37 GeKo: i thought about starting analysing the 'expectations of relay operators' and Tor CoC to find some criteria 16:33:00 well, i am fine working on a ticket. your call :) 16:33:04 this ticket: https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/community/relays/-/issues/51 16:33:13 yeah 16:33:36 looking at those two for a start is a good idea 16:33:55 i'll think a bit this week for other things we might be able to use 16:34:59 sounds good! 16:36:36 ggus: do you have anything else we should chat about today? 16:36:42 or are you good? 16:37:18 i think that was all! 16:37:26 great 16:37:32 juga: how are things going? 16:37:39 anything to chat about today? 16:39:14 i don't think so 16:39:34 i think i found a way to solve sbw#40142 16:39:44 k. otherwise we can bring things up in the s61 sync later or our 1:1 this week... 16:39:47 aha, nice 16:39:57 yes 16:40:53 okay, calling the meeting then. thanks everyone 16:40:57 have a nice week, too :) 16:41:00 #endmeeting