16:59:07 <ahf> #startmeeting Network team meeting, 29th August 2022
16:59:07 <MeetBot> Meeting started Mon Aug 29 16:59:07 2022 UTC.  The chair is ahf. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:59:07 <MeetBot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
16:59:09 <ahf> hello network-team
16:59:26 <ahf> pad is at https://pad.riseup.net/p/tor-netteam-2022.1-keep
16:59:44 <nickm> hihi
17:00:24 <ahf> let's see who else is around
17:01:07 <mikeperry> o/
17:01:08 <jnewsome> o/
17:01:12 <ahf> o/
17:01:28 <ahf> https://gitlab.torproject.org/groups/tpo/core/-/boards <- let's take a look if anything is off here
17:03:21 <ahf> i don't see anything entirely off
17:04:11 <ahf> dgoulet have arti#463, core/tor#40602, core/tor#40634 in doing and i think we will in this month probably talk a bit about the PoW one
17:04:19 <ahf> but the UDP stuff is not something we are in a hurry to dive into
17:04:34 <ahf> all good
17:04:48 <ahf> let's skip release status unless anybody have something to add here?
17:05:06 <nickm> wfm
17:05:23 <ahf> we have a meeting item from while i was AFK on talking about https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/issues/88
17:05:29 <ahf> is that something we should wait with to an arti meeting?
17:05:34 <ahf> or can i remove this from the discussion list
17:06:18 <nickm> I think we can remove; the question was "do we try to do this in 1.0" and the answer was "no."
17:06:24 <ahf> i assume this is related to our CC conversation we had last week
17:06:25 <ahf> yeah
17:06:27 <nickm> We should try to get it back onto our schedule when we can
17:06:32 <ahf> ok, so i remove it from 1.0.0 and move it to 1.2.x ?
17:06:41 <nickm> sounds good
17:06:50 <ahf> excellent, thank you. removing this from the agenda item too
17:07:24 <ahf> eta had an announcement from thursday on taking time off in end of september
17:07:59 <ahf> don't see anything new actionable from other teams
17:08:04 <ahf> mikeperry: you wanna do s61?
17:08:10 <mikeperry> ok
17:09:46 <mikeperry> I think the impacts from the DoS and related fixes are starting to stabize. basically, I am still waiting for 0.4.7.10 upgrade, and then I want to look into filteruing Guard and Fast relays
17:10:07 <mikeperry> basically using hiro's work from https://gitlab.torproject.org/jnewsome/sponsor-61-sims/-/issues/17
17:11:04 <mikeperry> the pile of cruft wrt that flag assignment is somewhat problematic, though, but I think it is still worth some investigation
17:11:14 <ahf> nice
17:12:04 <mikeperry> hiro: you are back this week, yah?
17:12:30 <mikeperry> geko is out today
17:13:00 <mikeperry> juga is still working on the sbws upload support and tickets related to https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/network-health/sbws/-/issues/40130
17:13:10 <juga> yup
17:13:40 <mikeperry> juga: I should have cycles to help review that and give input. hopefully I can be helpful :)
17:13:59 <juga> ok, thanks
17:14:44 <mikeperry> juga: has stuff been merged for it at all yet, or is geko still reviewing?
17:14:53 <nickm> mikeperry: I think I understand the cruftpile, at least as it exists in C tor, so if you'd like a second brain involved as you explore, just ask :)
17:15:24 <juga> mikeperry: geko already reviewed #40130, up to you to have look now, it's not merged yet
17:16:02 <juga> mikeperry: maybe you would also have a look to torspec#169
17:16:45 <juga> *would like
17:16:53 <mikeperry> nickm: yeah there is ticket that arma was poking at. I may ask both of you about the bw cutoffs later
17:17:02 <nickm> great
17:18:27 <mikeperry> juga: ok great, I will take a look at those both later this week; hopefully tomorrow
17:18:36 <juga> mikeperry: great, thanks
17:18:50 <hiro> Yes
17:19:12 <hiro> I am around
17:19:42 <mikeperry> hiro: ok. I will also resume poking at those filtering scripts you wrote this week, as per that sim-results ticket
17:20:44 <mikeperry> there's some stuff I also want to check on our netthealth relays wrt the 0.4.7.10 upgrade effects, but I will just follow up with geko on that later as well when he is back
17:21:12 <mikeperry> oh yes, next monday was going to be our s61 monthly sync, but it is labor day
17:21:24 <mikeperry> in the US
17:21:52 <mikeperry> so I am thinking we just move it to Sept 6th at 15utc like we usually do when mondays are holidays
17:22:17 <ahf> oh
17:22:19 <ahf> good point
17:22:39 <ahf> maybe we should do the same with the monday meeting while we are at it
17:23:14 <jnewsome> mikeperry: fine for me
17:24:07 <ahf> i've moved netteam meeting next week to tuesday at 17 utc as well in nextcloud
17:24:25 <ahf> i don't have the s61 meeting in nextcloud so i think someone else have that? :o
17:25:16 <mikeperry> I think I just moved it
17:25:20 <mikeperry> in nc
17:25:24 <ahf> which calendar is it in?
17:25:29 <ahf> should we move it to the netteam one?
17:26:01 <mikeperry> it is in "TPI meetings"
17:26:28 <ahf> ahhh, of course - it is a cross team meeting
17:26:31 <ahf> never mind then
17:28:06 <mikeperry> ok I think that it is for s61 unless there are any questions
17:28:10 * ahf has none
17:28:42 <ahf> i will dive into the metricsport stuff for C tor this week again
17:28:53 <ahf> so hopefully we can poke a bit at these memory things after next release
17:30:38 <ahf> ... nothing else? :o
17:30:40 <ahf> let's end this then
17:30:42 <ahf> thanks all!
17:30:44 <ahf> #endmeeting