15:59:27 #startmeeting network-health 05/30/2022 15:59:28 Meeting started Mon May 30 15:59:27 2022 UTC. The chair is GeKo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:59:28 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 15:59:40 okay, let's do some network-health/metrics sync 15:59:49 let's see who is around today 15:59:53 i know ggus is out 15:59:55 o/ 16:00:00 o/ 16:00:07 aha, hi! 16:00:15 http://kfahv6wfkbezjyg4r6mlhpmieydbebr5vkok5r34ya464gqz6c44bnyd.onion/p/tor-nethealthteam-2021.1-keep 16:00:18 is our pad 16:03:57 okay. nothing is marked as bold 16:04:16 it seems there is nothing you need any help with, juga and hiro? 16:04:34 GeKo: not at the moment 16:04:34 uhm I am not sure you know 16:05:01 but I was looking at the spikes I have in https://metrics.hiro.network/userstats-bridge-transport.html 16:05:59 and I was looking at the ratio of flakeys vs metrics.tpo 16:06:16 and this is approx 2 16:06:23 although we have more than 4 flakeys 16:06:48 so I was wondering if we approx know how many users does each flakey serve approx 16:07:08 but I guess that's part of the problem we are trying to solve 16:07:42 this is regarding https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/network-health/metrics/website/-/issues/40047 16:07:49 sounds a bit like https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/network-health/metrics/analysis/-/issues/40012 could be related? 16:07:54 yeah 16:08:12 yeah I was documenting the code we are using in the wiki 16:08:30 because of the logic leaves in the DB and some in the code 16:08:37 s/leaves/lives 16:08:43 good idea 16:08:52 ok I will ask in the ticket maybe 16:09:02 i am worried about the behavior with the spike you found when testing your code 16:09:08 sounds good, too 16:09:13 yes although I didn't change any of the logic 16:09:22 which is why i marked the patch as needs'revision 16:09:24 https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/network-health/metrics/website/-/merge_requests/20#note_2808465 16:09:34 just added the nickname to the set of columns which identify a node 16:09:36 do you plan to dig deeper into that hole? 16:10:36 uhm I think I will certainly try to document all we have in the code 16:11:02 because we need to have the same logic when we migrate to a DB based pipeline 16:11:12 right 16:11:32 anyways 16:12:29 okay, we'll see whether we find something useful for #40047 in that process i guess 16:12:32 thanks 16:13:27 alright 16:13:50 i think the overloaded guards someone pasted on the pad are not problematic right now 16:14:05 however, when looking at the graphs this morning i saw a jump in exit node overload 16:14:27 so i guess congestion control is (finally) kicking in with the tor update in tor browser 16:14:37 i'll keep a closer eye on that 16:15:06 otherwise nothing to report here from my side (apart from the things i mentioned on the pad) 16:15:32 i guess that means we can close the meeting and get back to do something even more useful :) 16:15:42 thanks everyone and have a nice week! 16:15:44 #endmeeting