13:59:51 #startmeeting ux team 13:59:51 Meeting started Tue Nov 26 13:59:51 2019 UTC. The chair is antonela. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:59:51 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 13:59:54 hello folks! 14:00:09 thanks for being around, another ux team meeting this week :) 14:00:37 please fill the regular pad with your items and/or items for discussion https://pad.riseup.net/p/tor-ux-team-2019-keep 14:05:00 okey, lets start 14:05:32 hi 14:05:33 I added the two letterboxing tickets to the agenda 14:05:35 sorry I'm late 14:05:40 hi pili! 14:05:50 i was just looking at the letterboxing comments 14:05:52 #32324 and #/32325 14:05:57 #32325 14:06:16 yes, thanks all for left comments there! we got really good conversations 14:06:17 couldn't see your mocks on #32324 14:06:44 here nah https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/32324/32324.png 14:07:30 thanks 14:07:31 :) 14:07:40 so, for the first ticket we are trying to find a solution that also works when the letterboxing margins are small 14:08:07 i'm not sure how to approach it but i'm sure that opening a popup is not the best idea 14:09:49 any idea around it is welcome to the ticket 14:09:59 the second ticket is #32325 14:10:02 antonela: a popup opening itself? or a popup after the user clicking the margins? 14:10:04 thanks diogosergio for working on it! 14:10:24 thurayya: neither of those if is posible 14:10:35 hmmm 14:11:13 Can we use those popovers with steps and cta to read more? 14:12:03 i think we can have an explainer at the onboarding which shows them and when margins are big enough we show the [?] icon 14:12:19 that is something that could work 14:12:43 so for #32325 we need some content review 14:13:04 your mockups are great diogosergio, i also think that we should move it to privacy&security since is not a Tor strictly related feature 14:13:30 yeah, makes sense 14:13:48 also the check could be [ ] Allow Letterboxing 14:15:09 yeah, should we keep the (recommended)? 14:15:28 if we dont have other customization options, it seems redundant 14:15:58 i wouldn't use it unless it was recommended 14:16:08 :( 14:16:25 thats true 14:16:42 its still something we recommend you turn on (although its on by default) 14:16:45 this is why we enabled it by default, maybe 14:17:08 yes, agreed. but i think if the user goes there to uncheck 14:17:24 maybe the "recommended" 14:17:35 * thurayya thinking 14:18:01 i think its a nice nudge to turn it on, or dont turn it off.. 14:19:50 ^ yes 14:20:16 okey i just commented to the ticket 14:20:29 we can keep the recommended, it works for me 14:20:43 again, thanks diogosergio for working on it! 14:20:58 anything else _around_ letterboxing? 14:22:02 next item is also mine but maybe we should talk about it during the triage next week? 14:22:13 #32460 14:22:28 ok 14:22:32 Hi all! 14:22:40 fwiw I think people also find it confusing without the banner 14:22:47 some users have expressed concerns about the download page, im fine iterating it but first i'd like to have some kind of analytics running there 14:23:04 what do they find confusing pili? 14:23:14 they don't understand the icons 14:23:15 hey T__ nice to see you around :) 14:23:19 for the different OSs 14:23:38 i see, do we need labels? do we need to remove the icons and have a list? 14:23:40 one interesting metric we could find is how many clicks on the download button in the banner 14:23:49 versus how many total clicks on the icons 14:23:52 which banner? 14:24:00 sorry, not banner in the landing page 14:24:22 so if we have a lot of clicks to go to the download page but they don't translate to actual downloads then we can see how widespread the problem is 14:24:35 yes, a classic funnel flow might be smart 14:24:44 because I think the feedback is that people expect the download to start when they click the link in the landing page 14:24:53 and we can do that 14:24:58 but we dont because privacy 14:25:09 we can just look at numbers 14:25:14 we don't need to track 14:25:39 Possibly just including a download cta bellow the icons would help to prompt them to action 14:25:51 that is the diference between clicks on www.torproject.org/download and the sum of actual downloads for each of the operating systems 14:25:55 yes yes, but i mean, we can start a download in the first click with the right os and locale version (like other browsers download pages) 14:26:06 not ah 14:26:15 s/not/ 14:26:25 yup 14:26:49 afaik is a decision not doing it 14:26:58 right 14:26:59 but hey, im fine on improving this flow, for sure 14:27:08 we have the download action hidden behind the icons, its not clear. if you include a download cta prompts users to download 14:27:25 diogosergio agreed, we can have a download on each of them 14:27:38 I'm not saying we should change it just that we can try to get some numbers on the extent of the problem by comparing those numbers 14:28:18 related on that, hiro has been thinking about https://dip.torproject.org/torproject/web/tpo/issues/22 14:28:23 pili: i think a lot of ppl clicks on 'sig' too, thinking it's going to download, b/c they are not used to check sigs 14:28:31 thurayya: true 14:28:58 that reinforces the idea of people expecting a download button 14:30:25 as you said 14:30:28 labelling might help: windows | sig 14:30:54 maybe we can triage this ticket with others website related tickets and also clean trac from new tickets and move them to dip 14:31:17 sure 14:31:55 should we include some pointers on how to verify sig? its common just to show the sig, but people dont see the value 14:32:11 or dont understand 14:32:18 but thats another matter 14:32:19 yes we should and also we should be consistent in the way we are talking about them 14:32:41 there is an updated entry in the support portal about it if i recall correctly 14:33:12 which we should link somehow to help people to do it 14:33:32 yes, that would be ideal 14:33:36 (maybe near to the signature file) 14:33:37 https://support.torproject.org/tbb/how-to-verify-signature/ 14:33:44 we have it now but quite below 14:35:15 moving it up would be already an improvement, making it more contextual 14:36:27 yep 14:37:01 oki, anything else on it? which are the next steps? 14:37:27 maybe someone wants to work on the next iteration, im happy to share the editable files for mockups but also PRs are good for it 14:37:42 do we have a way to check if this hypothesis is true? to see if ppl are clicking else where? 14:38:05 I would be happy to look into the next iteration 14:38:33 thurayya: maybe having some minimum analytics in place to get more insights or running a short sprint of research for it 14:38:50 diogosergio: awesome, ping me at the ux channel after this meeting so i can share those with you 14:38:59 * diogosergio thumbs up 14:39:04 * antonela cant wait for the day were all those files are already somewhere 14:39:44 having some analytics would be good :) 14:39:59 also, i saw it happening in some of the trainings 14:40:47 maybe we want to focus on the download flow with partners? 14:40:50 that could be interesting 14:41:08 because is a very easy interview and we also are doing it as part of needs discovery 14:41:33 good idea! gonna add this to our partner that will run a training in a couple of weeks 14:42:54 what do you guys mean by partner/training? 14:43:39 we are running this program in the global south were internet freedom organizations host tor related trainings and we also run user research 14:44:16 ah okay, that sounds great 14:45:34 thurayya: awesome, lets make the docs and add them to the repo and link from there 14:46:03 thurayya: im setting up the new nc instance, so some links may be broken -- expect some invites to the new one this week 14:46:12 okey, anything else on the download page? 14:46:15 should I wait for that? or can I do those small improvements? 14:46:26 diogosergio: you can! 14:46:31 we can work in parallel 14:46:36 sounds good 14:46:40 great 14:46:44 the last item is also mine 14:46:48 antonela: thanks! 14:46:55 pili, do you have any other ux-team ticket that should make the next release? 14:47:14 i didnt look at the onboarding one but i'll do 14:47:15 https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=merge_ready&status=needs_information&status=needs_review&status=needs_revision&status=new&status=reopened&keywords=~TorBrowserTeam201911%2C+ux-team&order=priority 14:47:24 I don't think so, we should discuss tomorrow during the release meeting 14:47:26 oh! i've a ticket I looked into briefly 14:47:30 we are working on letterboxing and also i've already reviewed the onion auth with acat 14:47:35 #32118 14:47:39 Please I'd like to give updates on my ICFP research, if there's some time. Sorry didn't include this in the meeting notes 14:47:41 pili: yes but any ticket we should bring there? 14:47:56 my priority are the S27 ones 14:48:08 so we can have something tangible to show 14:48:28 other than that I think we're good 14:48:31 diogosergio: oh nice, i'll drop a comment there 14:48:39 pili: ok, so lets see in the next meeting whats comes up 14:48:48 yup :) 14:48:53 T__: sure, go for it 14:49:52 I've been recruiting interviewees for the research, and I'm finding about 3 different types of circumvention tool users: 14:50:16 1. Those who use it to access censored/blocked content 14:50:42 2. Those who use it access content not blocked but want to do so anonymously 14:51:04 3. Those who want to access commercially blocked content 14:52:01 It's been revealing 14:52:30 thats great T__ 14:52:46 The first group access politically blocked websites, the third commercial websites 14:52:55 interesting :) 14:53:03 I wonder if the last group are relevant? 14:53:10 which countries is this in? 14:53:19 are you able to say? :) 14:53:22 i am on the last group sometimes :D 14:53:23 do you want to share those intermediate findings with the ux mailing list? 14:53:44 I've been recruiting in Nigeria and Cameroon for now, I'll commence for Uganda and Zimbabwe next month 14:53:55 i've been on the 3 groups, yes :) 14:53:56 T__: do they also use vpn, or vpn+tor? do they have concerns about it? (it's just a curiosity) 14:55:20 Thurayya: I've not delved into asking what particular tool they use 14:55:31 Antonela: Sure 14:55:54 awesome 14:56:23 anything else T__? 14:57:43 i remember we talked about putting you in contact with people from some country but i dont remember where do you need support 14:57:54 could you email me about it so we can add ggus to the loop? 14:58:17 maybe after the countries change, this is not an issue anymore :) 14:58:24 anyways, let me know T__ 14:58:35 i should end this meeting 14:58:40 thanks folks! 14:58:51 is a pleasure being here <3 14:59:03 o/ :) 14:59:08 So I've figured it's better for me to look for new personae, than using Tor's networks 14:59:09 thank you!! 14:59:14 Deepens the research 14:59:15 thanks all 14:59:18 Thanks! 14:59:21 #endmeeting