15:00:51 #startmeeting metrics team 15:00:51 Meeting started Thu Apr 18 15:00:51 2019 UTC. The chair is karsten. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:51 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 15:01:08 looks like a short agenda. 15:01:16 anything to add? 15:01:23 nothing more from me 15:01:30 not from me 15:01:52 acute? 15:01:58 no, not from me 15:02:02 okay! 15:02:07 - Adding bandwidth data to CollecTor #21378 (irl) 15:02:23 there are 3 locations that we might find bandwidth files we want to add to collector 15:02:44 i still believe that adding tjr|emailifneeded's archive is worthwhile and we should just do that but it's not urgent 15:03:01 we all agree we should archive them from the dir auths as part of collector's normal operation 15:03:02 what time does it cover? 15:03:11 it=tjr's archive 15:03:12 but, there's also some extra files that are stored on the bwauths that we could archive 15:04:03 tjr|emailifneeded's starts at august 2017 15:04:29 is there any ticket that talks about his archive? 15:04:40 i think he archives it on his home machine so it has gaps where his dsl broke 15:04:56 but that history is still interesting 15:05:07 it is. we might want to annotate where we got a file. 15:05:21 using @source or something. 15:05:41 right, i've had discussion with atagar about doing this and he was against it but i think it's something we should add to collector-protocol 15:06:01 yes, we should discuss this. 15:06:02 his argument for not doing this (implementing it in stem, that is) was that it's currently not done 15:06:19 but i did want to add this as part of bushel while i was developing that 15:06:54 ok. 15:07:01 what about those other files on bwauth disks? 15:07:28 i don't know how many of them there are, and they will be using the versions of the bandwidth file between 1.0.0 and 1.4.0 that we don't yet have parsers for 15:07:43 when were they written? 15:08:01 like, do the bwauths keep an archive of their own? 15:08:11 i think they are just left behind on the disk 15:08:15 i don't know if they get rotated 15:08:16 ah. 15:08:41 worth considering, yes. 15:08:59 gaba: there is not yet a ticket, but it should be a subticket of 21378 when it is created 15:09:06 for tjr's archive 15:09:12 yes, i just realized that 15:09:33 okay, lots of data out there, let's archive that. 15:09:50 in related news, I'm working on the m-lib patch. 15:09:59 ok cool 15:10:14 #30216 :) ? 15:10:16 does it look roughly like https://irl.github.io/bushel/_images/graphviz-ff5f73403e57bcfb8cbd4669b75f409a5bdb9d2e.png ? 15:10:19 started with tests and an interface, currently working on header lines. 15:10:47 gaba: yes, that one! 15:11:13 heh, nice. 15:11:22 yes, except for the part where there's no terminator. 15:11:37 that's the state machine i was validating the files with to ensure there were no stray spaces or newlines or whatever 15:11:37 which is optional, AIUI. 15:11:48 very useful. 15:11:49 yeah, this was to check that the 1.4.0 ones comply with that version 15:12:18 I'm planning to finish a first patch over the long weekend. 15:12:29 for the next review day on tuesday. 15:12:38 ok cool 15:13:16 okay, do we have anything else on this topic? 15:13:36 that's all for now i think 15:13:49 cool! 15:14:08 Roadmap: how are we doing with the task in progress? 15:14:28 the PRD for metrics portal? any talk with antonela? 15:14:45 the PRD is started and in progress 15:15:00 i did not yet talk to antonela but she does have access to the google doc 15:15:05 so maybe she already saw 15:15:07 nice 15:15:51 the other two (now at the top) look okay. 15:16:06 for #29377 and #29375 15:16:43 we have no target for when these are considered 'done', in theory they can be in progress forever 15:17:22 ∞ points 15:17:43 the one on test it could be reached on some test coverage expectation 15:17:50 in general, would it be possible to define percentages... yes, that. 15:18:08 do you have numbers on coverage? 15:18:11 it would be great to do that 15:18:14 similar with documentation 15:18:30 we are now at ~26% I think for tests 15:18:52 will check and update the ticket 15:19:00 ok, thanks 15:19:05 cool! 15:19:08 but if we could set some targets that would be helpful :) 15:19:23 there is also a point where it's not easy to add more tests because you need to refactor things to make them more testable 15:19:34 for test coverage depends on the code but around 60% is a good number :) 15:19:36 so this does get progressively harder 15:19:39 but yes, what irl says 15:20:37 okay, that last task (#29507) is currently on hold. 15:20:53 it's at the top of the backlog, but #30216 seemed more urgent. 15:21:05 ok, moving 29507 to top of backlog 15:21:06 same with #29315. 15:21:12 which is already in the backlog. 15:21:57 ok, that is it for the roadmap i think 15:22:00 acute: are you blocking on anything regarding OP tickets where I might unblock you relatively easily? 15:22:40 no, I don't think so 15:22:45 okay, great! 15:23:05 gaba: when will we have a kanban that is automatically synced with trac? ;) 15:23:29 i wish karsten yes 15:23:41 i'm looking forward to test the kanban tool in nextcloud 15:23:46 that is what we are evaluating now 15:23:55 neat! 15:24:02 the wekan in storm has so many bugs 15:24:35 :( 15:24:56 anyway, is this sufficient for the moment wrt. roadmap? 15:25:29 yes 15:25:42 cool! 15:25:46 anything else for today's meeting? 15:26:21 not from me 15:26:31 all done 15:26:50 all done 15:27:17 perfect! good holidays (if you celebrate them), and see you next week. bye, everyone! 15:27:24 bye! 15:27:27 bye! 15:27:33 bye! 15:27:36 #endmeeting