19:00:54 #startmeeting tor browser 19:00:54 Meeting started Mon Feb 27 19:00:54 2017 UTC. The chair is GeKo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:00:54 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 19:00:57 that im gonna think about this tomorrow, and most likely move PROTOID to the beginning 19:01:02 hi all ! 19:01:16 hi! 19:01:18 so we have another monday with another tor browser meeting 19:01:25 who wants to go first today? 19:01:28 hi! 19:01:42 * mcs will go first 19:01:56 Last week, Kathy and I spent a lot of time going through bug lists and developer notes for #19048. 19:02:02 We posted our findings in that ticket and we plan to work with GeKo to file bugs for things that need more work. 19:02:07 We also spent some time looking at #20761 again. 19:02:15 Earlier today we responded to the “design decision for Tor Launcher” thread on tbb-dev (https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tbb-dev/2017-February/000484.html) 19:02:21 This week we plan to work on a revised fix for #20761. 19:02:28 That’s all for us. 19:03:30 i realized to day that you took the hard road and reviewed all the things, not only the dev docs, nice :) 19:03:34 *today 19:04:02 Fun stuff. 19:04:05 :) 19:04:19 yeah 19:04:24 i can go i guess 19:04:59 so this week i found an old branch being basically ready for merging: #17034 19:05:09 i worked on #21536 19:05:24 but most of my time i spent on #15988 19:05:36 it's finally ready for review 19:06:08 then i continued my toolchain work and built the sandbox code for windows #16010 19:06:23 now we only need to get it to work :) 19:06:57 and i integrated the latest selfrando changes in #20683 19:07:03 i am currently testing that 19:07:38 i resumed my work on #19048 and started filing tickets and moving things around 19:07:53 this will be my main task for this week apart from release preparations 19:08:24 i hope i have a bug list with high prio bugs for the next 6 weeks ready by next monday 19:08:51 i plan to review #20095 19:08:55 err 19:09:02 #20905 19:09:12 might be alpha territory though 19:09:49 yeah, I think that might be best 19:10:21 i guess i could come up with a quick fix for #21396 for the next stable 19:10:25 we'll see 19:10:33 that's it for me for now 19:10:55 oh, we could need someone looking into #21555 19:11:04 any volunteers? 19:11:11 I can go 19:11:16 i have some guesses but no twitter account :) 19:11:40 I volunteer :) 19:11:52 (Phew, thanks arthur) 19:12:02 yes, thanks! 19:12:16 thanks! 19:12:19 tjr: sorry -- were you volunteering? Didn't mean to step on any toes :) 19:12:33 No I was misreading and was hoping I did not accidently volunteer :-p 19:13:12 lol 19:13:26 Anyway, tiny update: 19:13:33 Mingw is stalled at the moment, but I intend to resume it once I get hardware in, next week or this hopefully. 19:13:37 I had some meetings about mozilla onion services and we hope to move that forward once my new hardware comes in also. 19:13:42 The Fennec+Tor prototype is moving forward (I am not the developer behind that :) ) 19:13:49 Participated in discussions about firefox features that may impact Tor. If anyone wants to subscribe to a low-volume place to track this type of data a good choice would be: https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/author/mconleymozilla-com/ 19:14:18 And I got three (3!) inquiries about potential GSOC (mozilla GSOC) for the tor add-on prototype. No guarentee Moz is in GSOC or those students will be though. 19:14:23 (thats it) 19:15:17 yeah, i saw your project. if that is going to be something. let me know i am interested int it 19:15:40 s/int/in/ 19:15:50 what is “the tor add-on?” 19:15:51 i might have some cycles to help with things 19:16:16 make a test pilot add-on that bundles tor and makes measurements 19:16:21 maybe even submit telemetry via tor 19:16:33 tjr: thanks 19:16:45 Yup. Step 1 in the "Try and get Tor into Firefox proper" 19:16:59 yay 19:17:05 which is why it is so exciting :) 19:17:30 absolutely! 19:18:49 * arthuredelstein can go 19:19:07 This week I posted a patch for #20905. 19:19:32 (resizing bug on Linux) 19:19:34 I also wrote one for #21574 19:19:43 I also wrote one for #21574 19:19:48 And I wrote a patch for #21514 but I am still testing it. 19:20:35 fwiw: #20905 is actually not linux-only 19:20:38 I also started work on #21547. 19:21:10 (but i hope it will fix the issue for windows folks as well) 19:21:11 Geko: Yeah, I could have worded that better. The blocking part was Linux-only 19:21:26 okay, good then :) 19:22:11 Definitely is a cross-platform fix and also a cross-platform liability! :P 19:22:22 yeah 19:22:24 This week I plan to work on anything needed for the next release and try to get a working full bundle for #20680 that can serve as a basis for our new ESR52 patches. 19:22:56 i had a comment for you on #21308 19:23:35 Yeah, I need to go back and test both the old patch and the new. But if I recall correctly, the old patch causes crashes and I didn't immediately figure out why 19:25:00 ok. and there is one comment in #21267 as well you m ight want to think about 19:25:18 For #21308 I also submitted the patch to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1192643 so we'll see if Mozilla things it is correct. 19:26:06 GeKo: re #21267, I think that isn't a bad suggestion. I guess it depends on how hard the fix is but I also sympathize that you have had to disable that feature in every release. 19:26:48 that's actually the weakest part of the argument :) 19:26:51 but still 19:26:55 ... 19:27:13 I do want to get this feature into tor-browser.git in any case. The nastiest part is mimicking a "resizeend" event, which is why I am afraid it's a deep rabbit hole. 19:27:58 Anyhow, I will also work on #21555 this week 19:28:25 So that's it for me. 19:30:05 * boklm can go next 19:30:20 On #17379 I fixed some issues that prevented the Tor Browser built with rbm from working on Windows and OSX 19:30:25 I started looking at integrating FPCentral in our test suite 19:30:46 On #20426 I looked more at the small diff we have on tor.exe (and tor-gencert.exe in the expert bundle) but did not find yet how to fix it 19:30:54 This week I'm planning to integrate FPCentral in our testsuite, work on #21404, #20426 and help building the new releases 19:31:05 That's it for me. 19:31:53 boklm: could you put rbm stuff you have in the backlog into the repoand we maybe able to have a test tag? 19:32:14 then i could do a build as well and we could compare whether things look good on different machines 19:32:47 maybe we uncover other issues we'd like to know about early 19:33:12 GeKo: ok. I think we can have a test tag on what is in master. 19:34:19 okay, fine. or would just using that commit work as well? 19:34:35 yes 19:35:10 ok. then i'll look into building from 38863663120244e4becc66fe7a10cce92d8e639b tomorrow 19:35:45 ok 19:35:55 okay. who else is here for a status update? 19:38:39 do we have anything to dicsuss for today then? 19:39:40 alright. thanks for the meeting all *baf* 19:39:44 #endmeeting