19:00:57 #startmeeting tor-browser 19:00:57 Meeting started Mon Dec 12 19:00:57 2016 UTC. The chair is GeKo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:00:57 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 19:01:01 hi all! 19:01:06 hi! 19:01:08 time for another weekly tor browser meeting 19:01:09 hi 19:01:13 hello 19:01:14 hi 19:01:27 let's start, as usual, with a status update 19:01:32 who wants to go first today? 19:01:40 hi everyone 19:01:44 I tagged 19:02:14 will work on improving things unless someone tells me I should do something different, or I get overcome by existential nhilism and spend the days in bed instead 19:02:17 >.> 19:02:30 done 19:03:42 hm, so i realized we are calling the sandbox just "sandbox-0.0.2-linux$$.zip" and not "sandboxed-tor-browser-0.0.2-linux$$.zip" 19:04:00 my first impression was to not give the user the idea they download a whole sandboxed browser 19:04:11 and name the things what it is: a sandbox 19:04:19 but i am not sure anymore 19:04:46 "Tor Browser with a Diaper" 19:04:57 maybe it might be a more helpful thing for a user to have a "sandboxed-tor-browser" dir than 19:05:17 a plain "sandbox" one (with a sandboxed-tor-browser binary) 19:05:38 but, anyway, that is a thing we can figure out for the next release i guess 19:06:10 i can go next: 19:06:30 For what its worth, I think it would be better to use "sandboxed-tor-browser" as the name 19:06:48 i was mainly busy with preparing the releases and waiting anxiously for mozilla to tag their stuff 19:07:10 they finally did late on friday so that we were able to start building on the weekend 19:07:27 and it seems we are done with it having matching builds in all series (yay!) 19:07:55 i found a bit time to work on the design documentation and helped with the DRL proposal 19:08:56 this week i plan to get the releases out and work the design doc as much as possible and seems to be time to tackle #18925 19:09:05 that's it for me. 19:09:16 mcs: yes, i tend to agree meanwhile 19:09:36 So that zip does not contain the tor-browser itself, correct? 19:10:10 maybe “tor-browser-sandbox-…” ? 19:10:18 Or "sandbox-for-tor-browser"? 19:10:56 yes, correct 19:11:15 i'll open a ticket afterwards for the bikeshedding (and fixing) 19:11:48 * arthuredelstein can give a status report 19:11:58 Last week I worked on #10281 and started working on #20680. 19:12:05 Also I wrote a patch for #20947. 19:12:23 This week I will continue on the rebasing. 19:12:40 please have a look at #20941 19:12:47 Will do. 19:13:05 chances are that this is due to the resizing code living in firefox itself now 19:13:22 ok 19:13:43 interesting. 19:14:03 And I will continue to work with the DieHarder author to see if it's possible to get that working. 19:14:22 That's it for me. 19:14:37 * boklm can go next 19:15:11 This past week I worked on #17380 and I reproduced builds of the new releases. 19:15:19 This week I'm going to be at the reproducible build meeting during the next 3 days. Then I'm planning to fix #20949 and continue working on #17380. 19:15:26 That's it for me. 19:15:42 * mcs will go next 19:15:50 Last week Kathy and I revised our patch for #20121. 19:15:55 We also created a patch for #20761 (but that is on hold for now). 19:16:01 We also completed some code reviews. 19:16:05 This week we will mostly be working on some non-Tor projects. 19:16:10 We do plan to help with the TB sandbox blog post and we will be available if any issues come up with the releases. 19:16:15 That’s all for us. 19:16:47 From the HTTPS Everywhere side, most likely there will be a release made this week, 5.2.9 19:17:01 hi legind! 19:17:07 hey GeKo! :) 19:17:38 That's it for me 19:18:03 alright, anybody else here for a status update? 19:18:54 mcs: before i forget it: i might bug you wrt #20784 which is another of those extremely weird OS X bugs 19:19:12 i hope i get the profile sent and answers to my questions 19:19:13 right; we saw that and are still puzzled. 19:19:52 okay, do we have anything for discussion today? 19:20:31 do I need to help drafting the blog post 19:20:45 or can I just disappear and work on making the sandbox stuff better 19:20:53 the stuff you sent is good, thanks 19:21:08 k 19:21:15 i'll ping you probably tomorrow for feedback 19:21:22 once i have the draft up 19:21:24 the trac page I have going for the thing has more details I think 19:21:26 ok 19:21:33 good 19:22:18 should #20954's patch also fix the thing for windows? 19:22:25 no 19:22:26 people complain about everything but linux 19:22:36 we have instructions for windows which are working 19:22:43 ah ok 19:23:36 I posted my notes on memory hardening options here: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorBrowser/Hardening. Hoping to keep working on this in the coming months. 19:23:58 we should rename the sha256 sum file to "these-are-not-the-sha256-hashes-you-are-looking-for-use-gpg" 19:24:23 yeah, lol 19:24:35 :) 19:24:58 but frankly if folks are going to the advanced section and are not able to read then renaming would not help either i guess 19:25:10 arthuredelstein: good stuff 19:25:30 i was wondering whether you could sum up your investigation and add that to #10281 19:25:34 to get that beast closed 19:25:44 Will do. 19:25:45 (maybe pointing to that wiki page) 19:25:55 and we open new tickets for stuff we want to work on 19:25:59 like the dieharder thing 19:26:07 or the partitioning work 19:26:22 Yeah. I was thinking about opening a parent ticket for all memory hardening work. 19:26:36 redzones are definitely not the final answer 19:26:44 indeed 19:27:38 So much academic vaporware in the field :( 19:27:45 yeah 19:28:24 that is a good summary for the meeting i guess, thanks all *baf* 19:28:28 #endmeeting