17:00:54 <nickm> #startmeeting weekly network team shindig
17:00:54 <MeetBot> Meeting started Mon Aug 29 17:00:54 2016 UTC.  The chair is nickm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:00:54 <MeetBot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
17:00:59 <nickm> greeeeetings
17:01:35 <nickm> athena: asn: dgoulet: isis: mikeperry: hello!
17:01:46 <nickm> I'll start with a quick check-in!
17:02:06 <nickm> I implemented prop#264 and reviewed a lot of code and spent a huge amount of last week helping with grant stuff.
17:02:09 <nickm> This week I think I can finish #15055
17:02:20 <dgoulet> hi
17:02:39 <nickm> I also opened (with fixes) #20001 and #20002 and some other stuff, and merged and reviewed some other people's code
17:03:02 <nickm> let me revise my earlier projection:
17:03:07 <nickm> This week I think I can finish #15055 if there are no surprises.
17:03:14 <nickm> and when have I ever had a surprise!
17:03:36 <nickm> Also, tomorrow I'm having a birthday, so I will be only hacking as much as I feel like.
17:03:42 <nickm> I also plan to review a couple more tickets
17:03:48 <nickm> And that's where I'm at.
17:03:53 <nickm> Questions? Next update?
17:03:57 <nickm> (hi dgoulet !)
17:04:15 <dgoulet> nickm: hi! do you plan to open a review-group-8 or we should empty the -7 before?
17:04:31 <nickm> Has everything in -7 had a review?
17:04:42 <dgoulet> not sure, there is #17238 which is _huge_ ;)
17:04:58 <dgoulet> as part of my update, last week me and asn put it in merge_ready
17:05:29 <dgoulet> I've worked also on #20004 which contains trunnel definition of some 224 cells
17:05:42 <dgoulet> I plan to continue that work and move to the INTRODUCE1 cell work for prop224
17:05:42 <nickm> It looks like we still need a review on #7164 , #19163, #19767.
17:05:52 <dgoulet> ok!
17:05:55 <nickm> I should do #19163 ; the other two are mine.
17:06:07 <dgoulet> and I want also to do some more review so I should consider those
17:06:08 <nickm> err, the other two are my code
17:06:31 <nickm> #19767 had a comment from a user, but no review.
17:06:45 <dgoulet> that's basically it for me, #17238 was a big milestone for 224 but will require much more time for review so standing by on that
17:06:49 <dgoulet> nickm: ack
17:06:52 <dgoulet> done for me --
17:07:15 <nickm> Once somebody reviews #19163, #19767, and #7164 we can open a review-group-8.
17:07:25 <dgoulet> sounds good
17:07:35 <nickm> I hope to review  #17238 and #19163, I guess, unless somebody else should take them on first.
17:08:18 <nickm> wrt #17238 , I think it might be smart to coordinate with  prop#264 work I did, so that we actually try this versioning thing out
17:08:31 <nickm> ticket #19958
17:08:44 <nickm> but that's not something that requires a revision on your end
17:08:44 <dgoulet> nickm: HS has versionning already in the descriptor
17:09:03 <dgoulet> and we did the code to be version specific with high level version agnostic API
17:09:04 <nickm> How do you know which directories understand this kind of descriptor?
17:09:10 <dgoulet> URL
17:09:15 <dgoulet> /tor/hs/3/publish
17:09:28 <dgoulet> so it might fail
17:09:29 <nickm> How do you know which servers understand /tor/hs/3/publish?
17:09:43 <nickm> That's what prop#264 is all about
17:09:50 <isabela> nickm: (!! birthday :)
17:09:53 <nickm> previously we would have used tor version, which is not so good
17:09:54 <dgoulet> we do not know thus the idea of having it in 029 so ocne we deploy it in 031 probably we have lots of relay supporting it but yeah shaky
17:09:55 <nickm> (thanks isabela !)
17:10:00 <dgoulet> nickm: ok interesting!
17:10:26 <dgoulet> nickm: wait wat... _your_ birthday!?
17:10:33 <nickm> dgoulet: that's why I think we should see if prop#264 is an adequate solution for that, so we can know whether it actually fits your needs.
17:10:42 <nickm> everybody has one
17:10:47 <dgoulet> nickm: sounds good to me! I can take a look at it
17:11:03 <nickm> thanks.  Any comments on the design would be especially great
17:11:25 <dgoulet> ack
17:11:45 <nickm> anything else?
17:11:52 <dgoulet> good here
17:11:59 <nickm> isabela: you have an update?
17:12:18 <isabela> yep - finished working on proposals last week #fingerscrossed
17:12:29 <nickm> woooo
17:12:33 <isabela> thanks everyone for the ideas pad!
17:12:44 <isabela> i have another one this week (sept 1st)
17:13:07 <isabela> i also plan on figuring out with nickm and geko how we could better organize teams discussions during dev meeting
17:13:22 <nickm> (I'm excited to do that once August is over)
17:13:27 <isabela> indeed!
17:13:58 <isabela> meanwhile i am catching up with other stuff that the other proposals kept me away
17:14:10 <isabela> also please please lets use the monthly tags :) sept is approaching
17:14:16 <isabela> that helps me a lot on reports
17:14:16 <nickm> ahhh true.
17:14:38 <isabela> ok i think that's it
17:15:16 <nickm> (oh, also last week I put out two releases. Nearly forgot about that)
17:15:23 <nickm> anybody else around?
17:17:11 <nickm> athena: asn: ?
17:17:27 <nickm> armadev: mikeperry: anything for this meeting?
17:17:57 <nickm> isis:  how is the "wifi in de trein" ?
17:18:42 <nickm> Hm. Any discussion stuff we should be starting on?
17:19:02 <dgoulet> I,m all good here
17:19:20 <isabela> i dont have points for today
17:19:29 <isabela> (looks like we will have a quick meeting)
17:19:36 <nickm> ok.  Then I guess we wait a couple more minutes, then call the meeting.
17:19:41 <isabela> sounds good
17:19:47 <nickm> athena: asn: when you _are_ around, please share a quick update?
17:19:50 <nickm> (thanks!)
17:19:53 <nickm> #endmeeting