18:02:49 #startmeeting tor-browser 18:02:49 Meeting started Mon May 23 18:02:49 2016 UTC. The chair is GeKo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:02:49 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 18:03:08 hi everybody to another meeting and another exciting week 18:03:29 who wants to go first today? 18:05:13 it seems this taks falls back to me, okay. 18:05:18 here is what i did: 18:05:53 i worked on a bunch of tickets: #16285, #19115, #18885, #18944 18:06:04 * arthuredelstein is ready to go after GeKo. 18:06:12 and #18546 18:06:33 then i worked at our replacement deliverable for the e10s one 18:06:57 i helped weasel debugging out switch to a CDN for our mar files 18:07:05 i rviweed a bunch of tickets 18:07:25 and looked over a paper about the selfrando hardending in our tor browser 18:07:28 *reviewed 18:07:45 this week i plan to get the missing things for 6.0 reviewed and merged 18:08:05 then i want to get the build started tormorrow evening UTC 18:08:44 + i want to help getting 6.0 out, probably on friday 18:08:49 that's it for me 18:10:18 Last week I worked on patches for #18619, #18811, #18884. 18:10:33 I looked into server logging for #18996. 18:10:59 This week I will finished investigating #18996 and help with whatever tickets are needed for the build and the release. 18:11:45 And if there is time I thought I would investigate #13017 to see if there is more than an OS fingerprinting issue. 18:12:03 That's it for me. 18:12:03 arthuredelstein: i wonder if it would be smart to find a mozilla dev for #18811 18:12:20 like asking her/him if we overlooked something 18:12:47 otherwise i can try finding out something tomorrow 18:12:51 GeKo: That's a good suggestion. I'll see if I can ask the person who wrote the patch that caused the regression 18:13:03 that would be neat, thanks 18:13:29 Let me know if there are any other tickets you would like me to look at for the build/release. 18:13:37 i guess they are all lurking in #developer or something 18:14:03 I think so 18:14:12 yeah, i think we are good if i look at the tbb-6.0-must 18:14:35 if mcs/brade don't get to it earlier a review for #18950 would be helpful 18:14:56 i plan to prepare that one tomorrow. i might disable it due to lack of time, though 18:15:01 we'll see how far i get 18:15:26 By review you mean I should try to audit the Reader? 18:15:49 no, just look at the stuff i'll bring up for review 18:16:08 s/look/looking/ 18:16:13 Ah, ok. I'll keep my eye on the ticket. 18:17:02 who wants to be next? 18:18:04 * boklm can go next 18:18:25 This past week I worked on #19067 and #16758 18:18:29 On #18291, I was able to drop libfaketime for OSX/Linux builds (not completly for Windows yet). I still need to rebase and check the patches. 18:18:44 This week I'm planning to work on #18291, #19067 and help with the new release 18:18:57 that's it for me 18:19:09 * mcs will go next 18:19:29 Last week, Kathy and I worked on #18855, #18945, and #19047. 18:19:38 We also reviewed some Tor Browser patches and verified that #15713 seems to be fixed. 18:19:45 Then we started to work on #18912 but we did not finish. 18:19:51 This week we plan to finish our patch for #18912, help with code reviews, and help with whatever else needs to be done for TB 6.0. 18:19:59 boklm: what is left for #18597? 18:20:00 That’s all for now. 18:20:59 it seems a), no? 18:21:24 mcs: https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr45/rev/25271e7d1121 might interest you 18:21:44 at first glance it seems to me we are fine with our custom patches 18:21:57 GeKo: I think a) is "done in the resource timing test" 18:22:08 mcs: but you might want to have a look at this to 18:22:33 GeKo: so I think everything is done for #18597 18:22:44 GeKo: OK. Kathy and I will take a look. 18:22:56 boklm: i think what i meant with a) is this is done in the resource timing test 18:23:00 but not in the other ones 18:23:09 let me doublecheck 18:24:39 the resource timing test is this: https://gitweb.torproject.org/boklm/tor-browser-bundle-testsuite.git/tree/marionette/tor_browser_tests/test_resource-timing.py 18:26:34 boklm: seems you are right, let's close this one then. 18:26:47 who else is here? i saw a huseby a while ago... 18:29:31 okay. do we have anything else to discuss for this week? 18:30:12 Anything else you need from us before the build? 18:30:15 boklm: oh, and #19067 is bascially for the remaining qa related sponsoru thing, right? 18:30:29 arthuredelstein: i think we are good. 18:30:45 which is pretty neat, actually :) 18:30:58 GeKo: yes 18:31:12 ok, thanks. 18:31:58 Are we planning to meet at usual time next week? Next Monday is the Memorial Day holiday in the U.S. (although Kathy and I can be here for a meeting). 18:32:35 we can move it to tuesday, same time if it is easier for us folks? 18:33:09 Monday is actually better for me. I think I can't make it on Tuesday 18:33:22 (on that particular week) 18:33:57 Maybe stay on Monday then? 18:34:02 then let's keep monday then if it is okay for brade and mcs as well 18:34:09 yes 18:34:09 Sounds good. 18:34:26 alright, seems to be time for wrapping up. 18:34:48 thanks everybody and hopefully we'll get a 6.0 out this week which is not blowing up :) *baf* 18:34:51 #endmeeting