19:00:03 #startmeeting Tor Browser 19:00:03 Meeting started Mon Mar 14 19:00:03 2016 UTC. The chair is GeKo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:00:03 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 19:00:15 hi everybody 19:00:31 hi! 19:00:49 who wants to go first? 19:01:38 seems i am the one today, fine with me :) 19:02:22 * mcs is here and is now paying attention :) 19:02:25 last week i spent a great deal of my time reviewing and testing #13252 related code 19:02:40 this looks good so far, thanks mcs and brade for this work 19:02:51 thanks for your review 19:03:03 i worked a bit on the release bits and had a look at our comments 19:03:13 so far everything seems to be good 19:04:10 then i got involved with GSoC bits and worked on a bug bounty bug + found a way to reproduce #17761 reliably 19:04:24 the good news is the latter seems to be fixed in ESR 45 19:04:38 still i think i like to understand at least what is going on 19:05:26 i started to focus on esr45 stuff and found some time to work on the design doc 19:05:50 this week i plan to finish testing #13252 and getting it merged + getting a code-signed nightly out for testing 19:06:27 then i want to focus on #18545 and want to prioritie tickest for the esr45 based alpha 19:06:49 and if time permits i'd like to work further on the design doc 19:07:14 oh, and hopefully we might be able to get a proper esr45 branch with our patches; i'd like to look into that as well 19:07:18 that's it for me 19:08:13 * mcs will go next 19:08:24 Last week, Kathy and I spent most of the week rebasing the updater patches for ESR45 (part of #15197). 19:08:32 We revised our fix for #18371. 19:08:37 We also responded to review comments for #13252 and started to look at repackaging FTE (#18495). 19:08:45 This week we will create revised patches for #13252 and work on repackaging FTE. 19:09:08 And help GeKo with any #13252 build and signing issues that come up. 19:09:13 Time permitting, we will look at other ff45-esr tickets and triage some bugs that we have been ignoring (such as #18330). 19:09:19 That’s all for us. 19:10:18 * arthuredelstein can go 19:10:27 Last week I worked on the last remaining patches for #15197. I added mcs and brade's updater patches to my branch (thanks!). 19:10:40 I still have some last bits of cleanup to do, but I hope to have a branch ready later this week for review. 19:10:50 I am also making a list of patches that look amenable for writing regression tests, which I would like to work on next, after the rebasing is done. Hopefully that will help us catch birot if there is any. 19:11:16 er, bitrot 19:11:31 so that's it for me 19:12:34 arthuredelstein: really helpful would be if you could look at the c++ portions of #13252 as well this week 19:12:48 see comment 37 19:13:48 we might not need that for the nightly testing bundle but for the alpha definitely 19:14:07 and i think i am feeling more comfortable having a second opinion before merging all the code to master 19:14:29 (apart from the fact that this is our policy anyway ;) ) 19:15:22 GeKo: will do 19:15:27 thanks 19:15:30 (having connection problems at the moment) 19:16:39 * boklm will go next 19:16:54 This past week I published the new releases, reviewed #18405, added a test for meek for ticket #18518, worked on #16009 19:17:04 This week I'm planning to work on #16009 and running of the tests on OSX 19:17:14 That's it for me 19:18:33 boklm: thanks for getting all the bundles out. if you have anything in the release process doc that needs fixing let me know 19:19:55 ok. I didn't notice anything to change in the release process doc. 19:20:11 okay, do we have anyone else for giving a status report? 19:22:45 I will work on the networking code review this week 19:22:54 aha, hi mike! 19:23:17 yeah, this is #18546 fwiw 19:23:22 thanks 19:23:23 * mcs is glad to have mikeperry’s help and expertise 19:23:36 me too 19:23:47 * GeKo +1 from the team 19:24:04 do we have things to dicuss today? 19:25:08 Re #18545, I vaguely remember we had a list of changed features since the previous ESR in bugzilla. 19:25:38 Is there something like that still? 19:26:38 not sure what you mean. the only stuff i did back then was documented in comment 4 #16444 19:27:01 which basically is a feature audit of firefox 39 and 40 19:27:26 So are you mainly looking at the release notes? 19:27:55 (for the list of new features) 19:28:04 that's the first step and should give us the most pressing ones 19:28:17 the second step is looking at all the undocuemtned bugs 19:29:27 Undocumented meaning not in the release notes? 19:29:45 e.g. with an adpated search query from #16090 comment 7 19:29:48 yes 19:30:20 unforunately this is tedious work but we found some things this way last time 19:31:03 Ah, OK, I think that's the query I was half-remembering :) 19:31:08 thanks 19:31:13 aha, good. 19:31:33 do we have anything else for the meeting? 19:33:21 Not from me. 19:33:53 alright, thanks everybody *baf* 19:33:55 #endmeeting