13:30:05 <nickm> #startmeeting
13:30:05 <MeetBot> Meeting started Wed Dec 23 13:30:05 2015 UTC.  The chair is nickm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:30:05 <MeetBot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
13:30:12 <nickm> hi!  Who's here besides me and isabela ?
13:30:17 <asn> it's me
13:30:24 <nickm> yaaaaay!
13:30:41 <nickm> ok, could be a short meeting.  I'll start.
13:31:08 <nickm> I'm hoping I have some programming time between now and end-of-month to finish stuff; but we'll see.  I've been reviewing and merging and traiging, all of which fit into my december plans
13:32:12 <nickm> I'm going to be in California for the first week of next year, so that's a thing.
13:32:20 <asn> :)
13:32:43 <nickm> My brain is pretty fried, so I'm focusing on things that don't take too much of it, like figuring out the "kill old tors" problem.
13:32:43 <isabela> nice
13:32:57 <nickm> and writing tests
13:33:22 <nickm> I hope I get some rest this weekend :)
13:33:25 <nickm> who's next?
13:33:31 <asn> i can go
13:33:45 <asn> CCC is coming up, and I predict a period of restlessness.
13:33:48 <asn> but it should be fine :)
13:33:53 <asn> this past week worked on prop250.
13:33:55 <asn> we worked on the unittests.
13:34:09 <asn> we have something like 80% coverage on shared-random.c and shared-random-state.c .
13:34:20 <asn> i also worked on improving the spec.
13:34:48 <asn> with dgoulet we decided we are going to do some pair programming at the code and spec during CCC, and announce it as needs_review shortly after.
13:34:51 <asn> in other news,
13:35:12 <asn> the bug bounties program is starting up. there are 10 bug hunters in hackerone that got invited to our beta.
13:35:27 <isabela> \o/
13:35:41 <asn> i also provided a patch for #17178
13:35:46 <asn> (oops need to turn that to needs_review again)
13:35:53 <asn> and that's that.
13:35:56 <asn> life and code goes on :)
13:36:13 <asn> next please?
13:36:54 <isabela> my update is just that I am moving out of crazy busy fundraising things / plan on testing trac plug-ins and back on organizing teams stuff on Trac/wiki adding roadmaps etc
13:37:02 <isabela> so we have our sh**t together for 2016
13:37:15 <isabela> done
13:40:25 <nickm> ok. anybody else around? Pipe up soon if so!
13:40:40 <nickm> Moving to discussion: anything to discuss?
13:41:05 <GeKo> just a remark wrt the bug bounty program in case tor people missed this
13:41:38 <GeKo> the bounty is for all the things that land on master and similar branches
13:42:03 <GeKo> e.g. #17874 would probably have been a fine bug for the program
13:42:33 <GeKo> so, not just things found in releases are eligible
13:42:49 <nickm> okay; we'll see how it goes
13:43:01 <nickm> I'm a little worried, of course, but it is my nature to always be a little worried
13:44:32 <asn> nickm: right
13:44:57 <nickm> anything else for discussion, or do we call the meeting done?
13:45:01 <asn> nickm: IMO, if this rule end up being costly and/or useless, we can change it in the future.
13:45:26 <isabela> I am organizing components in a pad
13:45:34 <nickm> cool
13:46:17 <nickm> (I'm hoping other people can try out isabela's shiny testing trac instance for me ; I am swamped and a little braindead.)
13:46:54 <isabela> i will ask ppl for review before we actually change anything (components organizatoin)
13:50:57 <nickm> any more topics today.....??
13:51:02 <nickm> err, just one ?
13:51:07 <nickm> err, I meant,
13:51:10 <nickm> any more topics today.....?
13:52:45 <ioerror> GeKo: i have a torbrowser question for you when you have a second
13:54:00 <Yawning> meep?
13:54:14 <Yawning> nickm: oops
13:54:33 <Yawning> nickm: I'm uh, poking at obfs5
13:54:52 <DrWhax> /w 27
13:54:54 <DrWhax> aw snap
13:55:48 <GeKo> ioerror: hi, what is it?
13:56:16 <ioerror> GeKo: i'm running torbrowser on a grsec enabled x86_64 bit system and as a result, i can't run torbrowser for a number of reasons
13:56:18 <nickm> Yawning: ok cool.  I'm hoping that I can get both you and the ntru folks to put out their drafts for pq circuit extension before rwc so that I can talk about both
13:56:22 <Yawning> nickm: which may or may not be the best use of my time, but hey, someting to do
13:56:29 <Yawning> nickm: ideally we collaborate
13:56:42 <ioerror> nickm: i'm set to review a paper about that for pets
13:56:44 <Yawning> because we're using what amounts to the same construct
13:56:45 <nickm> yeah, but I think having both out to start with would be a good starting point
13:56:45 * isabela (forgot to give the update that I sent deliverables to Sue A. to build contracts,they should be coming in soon)
13:57:05 <nickm> hmm, I see
13:57:20 <Yawning> the only thing that's different is ntru vs ring lwe
13:57:22 <nickm> well, i emailed them yesterday to ask if we could make their proposal public, so we'll see
13:57:23 <ioerror> GeKo: i can wait until the meeting is over
13:57:36 <Yawning> yeah their draft had a bit for "future ring lwe"
13:57:45 <Yawning> so I can append what I want to do there
13:58:01 * GeKo forgot that the meeting is still ongoing, sorry
13:58:29 <Yawning> the ntru thing does have "the keys are about half the size on the wire (parameterset depending)" going for it
14:00:25 <nickm> any other topics for the meeting?
14:00:38 <Yawning> uh, also playing with Ed448
14:00:47 <nickm> Yawning: wrt deciding I'm thinking that I could do worse than strawpoll the floor of rwc
14:01:10 <Yawning> I'm inclined to push rather strongly for ringlwe
14:01:15 <Yawning> despite being newer but yeah
14:01:43 <nickm> if no other topics, then #endmeeting
14:01:48 <nickm> #end
14:01:51 <nickm> #endmeeting