13:29:59 <nickm> #startmeeting
13:29:59 <MeetBot> Meeting started Wed Feb  4 13:29:59 2015 UTC.  The chair is nickm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:29:59 <MeetBot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
13:30:04 <nickm> it is a tor dev meeting!
13:30:06 * Yawning hands nickm a waffle
13:30:10 <karsten> hello tor dev meeting.
13:30:18 <nickm> a waffle?
13:30:24 <Yawning> #
13:30:28 <nickm> hello karsten , Yawning ! Anybody else here?
13:30:39 <Sebastian> I am here
13:31:32 <asn> i'm around
13:32:35 <athena> greetings, meeting
13:33:49 <nickm> so, we're a couple days into the slushy stage of the freeze
13:34:15 <nickm> a few more branches exist that we should look at before we push ahead.
13:34:43 <nickm> 50 tickets left in the milestone.
13:35:09 <nickm> Virgil would like us to have another look at the 12844, which we can do if the code is okay.  We shouldn't base decisions on that though.
13:35:26 <nickm> err, on his offer of $300 if it gets merged in 0.2.6.
13:35:30 <Yawning> #12844
13:37:45 <nickm> we should also triage the remaining issues for 0.2.6
13:38:44 <nickm> and probably start trying to get another alpha out the door :)
13:38:52 <nickm> what else should we be talking about and doing?
13:39:22 <Sebastian> I'll be focusing on test stuff
13:39:56 <Sebastian> So if anyone has input on what areas I should focus on or where more controller/tor interaction would help, that'd be a grand topic
13:41:03 <nickm> i'm also hoping to scrounge up the time for a major chutney refactor
13:41:25 <Sebastian> I haven't played with chutney too much, just used a couple of times. But I could look at that, too.
13:41:42 <nickm> it's a handy little tool, but I want it able to test more things.
13:42:14 <Sebastian> You mean in an automated fashion, yes?
13:42:16 <nickm> Shall we divide up and plan the remaining review / triage for 0.2.6?
13:42:16 <Sebastian> Or in general?
13:42:17 <nickm> Sebastian: yes
13:42:20 <Sebastian> ok.
13:43:39 <nickm> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/query?status=needs_information&status=needs_revision&status=reopened&status=needs_review&status=assigned&status=new&status=accepted&group=status&milestone=Tor%3A+0.2.6.x-final
13:44:35 <nickm> 8 in needs_review, 1 in needs_revision, 28 in new, 5 in needs_info, 8 in assigned
13:44:43 <nickm> let's divide up the review?
13:44:59 <athena> works for me
13:45:07 <nickm> I volunteer to take #9321 and #13125. (asn's guard stuff)
13:45:37 <nickm> sysrqb: looks like I did review your code on #12538, and I had some questions.  Could you answer those?
13:45:55 <nickm> #9729 is a bit complex IIRC; anybody want to take on the review?
13:46:09 <athena> i'll take #9729 and #11457
13:46:33 <nickm> if you're doing #11457 maybe you should look at #11454 too ?  It's the same code IIRC
13:46:40 <Sebastian> I had concerns in #12538 which weren't adressed imo
13:47:03 <Sebastian> (not by the patch author, about the general approach)
13:47:04 <nickm> Sebastian: ok; reiterate them on the ticket, or add a new comment linking to your old comment?
13:47:11 <nickm> This leaves #13483 and #14184
13:48:11 <nickm> for #14184 I am almost tempted to defer to 0.2.7, since our changes for "freak out if too many guards" will require new guard structures anyway
13:49:37 <nickm> that leaves #13483, which has a patch from dgoulet.  It's on the hs code. anybody ?
13:50:11 <athena> nickm: okay, will do for #11454
13:51:17 <nickm> athena: you also offered to look at #12844.  Still ok with you?
13:51:25 <nickm> I just threw it back into  0.2.6
13:51:30 <athena> yeah, think so
13:51:35 <nickm> great.
13:51:51 <nickm> this leaves only #13483 , I think.  Anybody else want to review something? I don't think it's long.
13:52:11 <Sebastian> I can review #13483
13:52:15 <nickm> thanks!
13:53:06 <nickm> so to reiterate, I have #9321 and #13125.   athena has #11457 and #11454 and #12844 and #9729.
13:53:25 <nickm> Sebastian will repeat comments about #11538 and will review #13483.
13:53:33 <nickm> I will defer #14184.
13:53:39 <nickm> err, not 11538
13:53:55 <nickm> Sebastian will repeat comments about #12538 and will review #13483.
13:53:59 <nickm> sounds good.
13:54:17 <nickm> oh, we should decide what to do with #14478
13:55:11 <Sebastian> can't we just fix the patch?
13:55:22 <nickm> which patch?
13:55:26 <nickm> 14478 ?
13:55:38 <Sebastian> yes
13:56:17 <nickm> Hm. ISTR it was more work than I wanted to do and the cpunks explanation there was a little confusing to me.  But if someone wants to fix it, that would be fine
13:56:29 <nickm> I might be irrationally afraid of sh
13:57:20 <Sebastian> I'll look at it, if I think it can easily be fixed I'll put up a patch.
13:57:35 <nickm> great
13:57:55 <nickm> shall we end this meeting then and move right on to triaging the remaining stuff?
13:58:21 <Sebastian> if nobody has anything else to add
13:58:26 <Sebastian> fine with me
13:58:27 <nickm> (FWIW, I will be out of town MTW of next week, so others should have the next meeting without me)
13:58:46 <nickm> will wait a minute to see if anybody has something more
14:00:11 <nickm> #endmeeting