19:00:59 <GeKo> #startmeeting
19:00:59 <MeetBot> Meeting started Mon Dec  1 19:00:59 2014 UTC.  The chair is GeKo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:00:59 <MeetBot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
19:01:11 <boklm> hi
19:01:13 <helix> #yolo
19:03:26 <helix> so at least 2 people are missing
19:03:32 <helix> I'm just gonna ask my question
19:03:36 <GeKo> I finally tracked down #13788 this week, tested/reviewed #13379, worked a bit on #9387 and started fighting with the releases
19:03:46 <helix> GeKo: what is the key situation? sounds like 2 impending releases coming up
19:03:51 * helix waits until you're done
19:03:58 <isis> i can pretend to be either mikeperry or arthuredelstein, if it helps
19:04:41 <GeKo> oh, and I got #13420 fixed/upstreamed
19:05:30 <GeKo> this week I am in charge for releasing it seems not sure how much I'll do besides this...
19:07:03 <GeKo> helix: they key situation is that we won't have a new key ready unless a miracle happens and mikeperry looks at my pond message
19:07:18 <GeKo> and thinks the keys I generated are good
19:07:30 <helix> well there's still the documentation etc problem
19:07:38 <helix> so I'll just assume I'm signing these releases too
19:07:45 <GeKo> I somehow doubt this is going to happen in the next two days given that it did not happen within the last two weeks
19:08:02 <GeKo> helix: yes, that would be good
19:08:04 <helix> np
19:08:06 <helix> :)
19:09:08 <isis> can i ask the properties desired of the keys and their generation? (i know gpg automation kungfoo :) )
19:09:43 <isis> though if that is a side-track, i can ask again later
19:10:36 <GeKo> an offline key that is only used to certify subkeys, 3 signing only subkeys
19:11:15 <isis> each subkey for one developer, i assume?
19:11:45 <GeKo> well, the idea was one for mike, one for me and the third one maybe for a signing server, not sure yet
19:12:43 <GeKo> who likes to be next?
19:12:54 <isis> okay, sound like you've got that handled, Geko :)
19:13:08 * boklm can go next
19:13:30 <GeKo> I hope it caused my quite some time to setup everything properly and check the keys with |hokey lint| etc.
19:13:37 <GeKo> *hope so
19:14:19 <boklm> So I tried to run the tor browser testsuite on Windows, and fixed a few things
19:14:32 <boklm> and I have been able to run some of the tests in my VM: https://people.torproject.org/~boklm/tmp/tests/r/AQIeFyIx1X/torbrowser-install-4.0.1_en-US.exe.html
19:14:47 <boklm> This week I'm planning to fix some more Windows testsuite problems and deploy it on our Windows test machine
19:15:10 <boklm> add a test "check that some important websites can be loaded"
19:15:27 <boklm> I will also try to do #13857
19:15:46 <boklm> that's all for me
19:20:27 <pfm> dgoulet: you can specify using color=factor_var where factor_var is the same length as your data and is categorical (so e.g. 'dtype1, dtype2, dtype3') and then specify a particular colour for each category using +scale_color_manual(values=c(color1, color2, color3)) where color1 is the actual colour value you want for dtype 1
19:20:32 <pfm> dgoulet: if that makes sense
19:21:24 <dgoulet> pfm: yah interesting
19:21:26 <pfm> dgoulet: so you need to preprocess your data to get the conditional colouring into factor_var
19:22:31 <GeKo> ok. who else is here for the meeting?
19:22:34 <pfm> normal R lets you do it a little more inline, like through cols=ifelse(x>5, 'red', 'blue') or w/e
19:22:36 * MarkSmith Can give a report.
19:22:45 <pfm> oh damn sorry, didn't notice meeting
19:22:46 * pfm slinks away
19:22:56 <MarkSmith> Last week was a short week for Kathy and me (we took a couple of days off for the U.S. Thanksgiving holiday).
19:23:08 <MarkSmith> We did a little work on #13379, mostly looking at the issues that GeKo raised in the ticket.
19:23:16 <MarkSmith> We also did some triage on #13818.
19:23:26 <MarkSmith> This week we will pursue a better signature for #13379 and help as needed,
19:23:32 <MarkSmith> e.g., with #13818, code reviews, and the TB releases.
19:23:39 <MarkSmith> That's all for us.
19:24:37 <GeKo> if you could look at #13671 today or tomorrow that would be neat
19:24:51 <GeKo> I may not have the time tomoroow but like to get it into 4.5-alpha-2
19:25:23 <MarkSmith> GeKo: We will take a look.
19:25:35 <GeKo> and the polishing I did for #9387 is needing a reviewr, too. I update the ticket with a branch after the meeting
19:25:38 <GeKo> thanks
19:28:05 <GeKo> Anybody/anything else?
19:29:41 <GeKo> ok, thanks everybody. Still no special equipment, thus
19:29:45 <isis> someone on twitter found a bug in the DPI spoofing because i pointed out that the test on browserspy.dk seemed janky/broken: https://twitter.com/0xPoly/status/539475293141233664
19:29:46 <GeKo> #endmeeting