13:59:04 #startmeeting Activation Working Group October 26, 2018 13:59:04 Meeting started Fri Oct 26 13:59:04 2018 UTC. The chair is russdeffner. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:59:04 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 13:59:46 Seems like it's been a busy week for most; anyone around? 13:59:57 Say hello to get noted by the bot 14:01:57 Hi 14:02:07 hey Blake 14:02:10 Hi Russ 14:03:04 If it's just us, think I'll just make some announcements here and we can just chat about other stuff in #disaster-mapping 14:03:44 Mainly that this time won't work for me after DST ends 14:04:28 Hello all 14:04:39 So thinking we just move it now/for next time which will keep the time the same for folks in Europe 14:05:03 and we'll just have the akward couple of weeks of different time in US 14:05:38 and hello Ralph 14:06:32 Folks in Europe are also coming off Summer Time soon but I am able to accommodate any time around now. 14:07:38 ok, it just will be too early for me once the US changes; would actually prefer to move it 2 hours 14:07:54 there's currently an overlap with a MM meeting 14:08:13 I think the UTC time should just change so everyone's local time stays the same. 14:08:42 unless we decide to change the time more broadly. 14:09:32 well, looking at the calendar the MM comms meeting is keeping the UTC time; but that might just be because they haven't discussed time change yet 14:09:56 so if we just move AWG 1 hour, should be fine 14:10:18 There is a Strategic Planning meeting today at 3pm UTC (in less than an hour) but I do not know if that will be the regular slot. 14:10:44 It probably won't 14:11:17 I'm in that WG and the following is a Mon/Tues in November if I remember correctly 14:13:48 so we have it? next meeting of AWG will be at 1500utc? 14:14:05 I second 14:14:06 #topic Meeting Schedule 14:14:25 That is fine for me 14:14:41 Hi Ralph 14:14:47 Hi Blake 14:15:56 #agreed AWG Meetings beginning November 9th will begin at 1500utc on IRC 14:16:14 #topic Unfinished Business 14:18:33 I'm just reading over the cards for previous meeting and unfinished business 14:18:47 Don't think I have much to report on anything 14:19:24 Has anyone had a chance to play with the staging TM? 14:20:24 Think there was some changes/fixes/enhancements to legend and such; wonder how that fits into possibly changing the color schema? 14:22:29 I'm just going to do a github issue now or it'll keep falling off the radar 14:22:40 I have had a glance at them. The buttond for splitting the square and for bad imagery are now more prominent. 14:27:17 Other than that I see very little difference but then maybe I do not know what I should be looking for. 14:34:03 Ya, one reason I haven't looked into it yet is I didn't readily see a 'here's whats new' 14:34:52 and sorry submitting that issue took a minute cause there's a handful of existing issues with 'color' something or another 14:35:34 #info - submitted https://github.com/hotosm/tasking-manager/issues/1257 to address the coloring of tasks 14:37:24 @russell.deffner If you select a project, click on the button for ACTIVITY AND STATS and you will see the layout has changed and coloured tabs have been added to the left 14:38:56 Ah, thanks Ralph - I'll look at that 14:39:33 #info submitted https://github.com/hotosm/tasking-manager/issues/1258 to address 'I have read instructions' button 14:39:59 Also when you select a square for validation it gives a lot more detail about that square. 14:40:51 Nice 14:41:39 Blake - do you know if/where there are TM 'release notes'? 14:42:13 You would probably have to look at the github merge log from develop to master if they did not send out an email 14:42:26 but ethan sent something out, that wasn't an indications of changes? 14:43:16 they did send an email, but yeah - think since it's a bunch of hacktober contributions, probably hard to keep track 14:43:25 https://www.hotosm.org/updates/hacktoberfest-update-tasking-manager-improvements-and-more/ 14:44:13 ah, I guess you can track back to the issues that were resolved 14:45:13 Here is the list, it was in that blog post: https://github.com/hotosm/tasking-manager/pull/1245#issuecomment-431540433 14:46:00 ah ya - that's what I was looking for 14:47:42 so, the next unfinished biz, I think we just need to roll over to next time 14:48:00 I haven't updated wiki and doesn't look like anyone else has 14:48:47 Although we could maybe establish a Protocol version that we can use for drafting changes 14:49:05 let me see, think I probably have one... 14:51:28 Yep 14:51:39 #Link DRAFT Activation Protocol https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qefHRE3_wUyG3lMSb7NlkSDtPuQeaQXsflkxt3E3xSA/edit?usp=sharing 14:53:44 How is HOT involved when the activations are published on different Tasking Managers? Our pool of mappers/validators are looking at the HOT Tasking Manager. 14:54:07 So let us review that and/or suggest/comment there before we make any decision on how to handle 'small events' 14:54:44 The protocol/methodology isn't dependent on tool(s) 14:56:01 we might activate around a maproulette project as example 14:56:24 But is being taken out of the hands of the Activation Coordination Team and run by local groups 14:56:53 can only really happen other way 'round 14:57:04 our CoC is to defer to locals 14:57:51 But it is being done in the name of HOT and thus reflects back on HOT 14:57:59 And the record so far for validation on those other Tasking Managers is not good 14:58:10 but I do need to jump to SWG meeting, so we'll table those other topics 14:58:26 OK 14:58:27 training and communication is my answer Ralph 14:58:43 'if you see something, say something' 14:59:00 they probably just don't know what they're doing and could use help 14:59:46 ok, thanks for coming! see you in a few weeks 14:59:50 #endmeeting