19:04:45 #startmeeting 19:04:45 Meeting started Wed Apr 28 19:04:45 2021 UTC. The chair is elbrus. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:04:45 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 19:04:53 #topic Admin 19:05:02 #info Previous minutes: http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-release/2021/debian-release.2021-02-24-19.00.html 19:05:10 #info elbrus had an action to contact DSA to see if it's on their agenda, which is done 19:05:17 #topic Freeze progress 19:05:32 This is the only topic, let's log it by starting the meeting 19:05:55 ginggs, Sebastinas, do you have anything to discuss on the topic? 19:06:38 new things that pop-ed up since last time we spoke? 19:07:10 from my side, release-notes are going steady 19:07:31 Only thing that comes to mind are some of the empty-package-RC-bugs that are now getting fixed by dropping binary packages 19:07:39 #987558 for example 19:08:57 I *think* that the intention was to avoid mistakes where the package should have content 19:09:52 what do you want to say about it? 19:10:11 I haven't looked at this specific case, but since we're past the point where we allow removal of binary packages … 19:10:17 that bug isn't RC 19:10:23 at least, not now 19:10:35 wait, that's the unblock bug 19:11:01 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987455 19:12:23 we'll allow it if it's the right solution to fix an RC bug obviously, the question is, is mere emptyness RC in our book (and not a bug where files somehow went missing to be installed) 19:12:51 is bunk around? maybe he can explain his intentions 19:13:41 It's a useless package of course. 19:14:18 I think we agree on that, but is it RC and if so, does it need to be fixed for bullseye? 19:15:27 I think that's a class of bugs where we can live without fixes. 19:15:35 And deferred them to bookworm. 19:16:29 except, it's hard to tell without careful looking if it's a left over empty package, or empty by mistake.... 19:16:33 qupzilla-plugin-kwallet is even a transitional package for a package that never existed 19:17:17 I didn't file bugs for packages where it was clear that it was a transitional package. 19:17:38 falkon-plugin-wallet looked like a mistake, but wasn't 19:18:48 I thought I read somewhere indeed that you took care to avoid "just" filing the bugs already 19:19:19 so all those bugs you *think* are showing a mistake 19:19:33 exactly 19:19:46 I agree with the downgrade after someone looked more detailed 19:19:49 then I think we'll just see case by case when they come by 19:20:14 I'd argue for the falkon case that having the packages dropped is less confusing for users 19:20:34 but clearly a "nice to have", not a "must fix" 19:32:17 Okay, looks like most of the others were actually fixed by building docs, manpages, etc 19:32:45 Otherwise nothing out of the ordinary 19:32:49 sorry, distracted IRL 19:34:00 I think it's time for another Bits soon 19:34:34 with a call to test upgrades? 19:34:47 with a call to test the installer. 19:34:51 s/?/./ 19:37:14 point at bug #987441 ? 19:37:39 if people want to help? 19:38:21 other topics? 19:38:34 #action elbrus to draft a new bits 19:38:47 i'm happy to help review bits 19:38:56 great 19:39:02 no other topics from me 19:39:24 If we send out bits … what about the hard freeze? 19:39:36 Or do we wait until we have a release date? 19:39:52 good point 19:43:57 to be honest, I'm a bit at a loss on how to continue in our d-release thread 19:44:48 so I guess we better settle that before announcing further in the bits 19:46:58 #topic AOB 19:47:09 anybody? 19:47:32 Nothing else from my side. 19:48:14 ginggs ? 19:49:07 nothing else here either 19:49:21 #topic Next meeting 19:49:32 #info Next meeting is 26th May at 19:00 UTC (import into your calendar via https://release.debian.org/release-calendar.ics) 19:49:39 #endmeeting