======================================================= #debian-release: Architecture Qualification for Stretch ======================================================= Meeting started by jmw at 20:00:35 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-release/2016/debian-release.2016-10-30-20.00.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * amd64/i386 (jmw, 20:12:20) * AGREED: amd64/i386 stay (jmw, 20:13:11) * arm64/armhf/armel (jmw, 20:15:26) * DSA has mild concerns over armel/armhf local admin requirement, but the host is well-resourced, works normal hours and isn't going away any time soon (jmw, 20:17:38) * armel/armhf have only indirect upstream support through the family, but that's not considered a big issue (jmw, 20:18:03) * AGREED: arm64/armel/armhf stay (jmw, 20:18:14) * s390x (jmw, 20:19:58) * DSA relies on sponsors for hardware (mild concern) (jmw, 20:20:11) * AGREED: s390x stays (jmw, 20:20:57) * mips/mips64el/mipsel (jmw, 20:21:59) * LINK: https://ftp-master.debian.org/users/mhy/mipsel64import.txt (aurel32, 20:26:51) * LINK: http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-release/2016/debian-release.2016-09-28-19.00.html was the meeting (jmw, 20:27:31) * AGREED: mips/mips64el/mipsel stay (jmw, 20:33:44) * ppc64el (jmw, 20:34:56) * DSA relies on sponsors for hardware (mild concern) (jmw, 20:35:02) * ppc64el stays (jmw, 20:41:01) * powerpc (jmw, 20:41:08) * Lack of porters is a blocker (jmw, 20:43:41) * AGREED: powerpc will not be a release architecture for Stretch (jmw, 21:32:59) * For the avoidance of doubt, it's not the release team's decision whether powerpc stays in the main archive for sid or is moved to ports (jmw, 21:33:35) * AOB (jmw, 21:34:13) * ACTION: jmw write summary of decisions (jmw, 21:34:34) * ACTION: general: suggestions for improving this process by mail please (jmw, 21:39:10) * ACTION: jmw schedule discussion of process improvement in next cycle (jmw, 21:39:20) Meeting ended at 21:40:15 UTC. Action Items ------------ * jmw write summary of decisions * general: suggestions for improving this process by mail please * jmw schedule discussion of process improvement in next cycle Action Items, by person ----------------------- * jmw * jmw write summary of decisions * jmw schedule discussion of process improvement in next cycle * **UNASSIGNED** * general: suggestions for improving this process by mail please People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * jmw (113) * nthykier (42) * adsb (42) * aurel32 (41) * bunk (13) * Sledge (12) * ansgar (4) * MeetBot (3) * KiBi (3) * Q_ (2) * pochu (1) * ana (1) * vagrantc (1) * jcowgill (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot