21:01:26 #startmeeting 21:01:26 Meeting started Sun Sep 20 21:01:26 2015 UTC. The chair is Ganneff. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:01:26 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 21:01:38 do we have an agenda for today? 21:02:32 addchair mhy 21:02:38 addchair ansgar 21:03:01 and who else is here? 21:03:26 I'm only half here I'm afraid 21:03:30 #topic agenda, anyone? 21:03:58 I think we don't have one. At least the titanpad doesn't have it. 21:04:07 ay 21:04:12 weve been bad in maintaining that 21:04:45 ok, well maybe let's start with the non-free firmware component 21:05:04 #topic non-free firmware component 21:05:11 we were "waiting for an advocate"! 21:05:15 that mostly needs a driver to do it. 21:05:18 (no ! intended) 21:05:19 anyone up to take it? 21:05:36 People at DebConf looked like they might want to do it. 21:05:48 It's mostly dealing with the installer and things I guess. 21:06:05 if we have someone pushing it, i dont think we block it, so whoever wants it can get it done? 21:06:23 i cant/wont be it for now, im playing with the bikesheds in th ebit of time i have available 21:06:31 I think so. Basically have them prepare d-i and debian-cd and tell us which packages to move once they are ready. 21:07:05 #info non-free firmware component just needs someone to do it. Basically have them prepare d-i and debian-cd and tell us which packages to move once they are ready. 21:07:24 ok, so the thing is that we need to ask -boot and -cd 21:07:34 And please call it non-free-firmware, not non-free/firmware ;) 21:07:37 so, KiBi and Sledge presumably 21:07:42 yes, can we start to scrap the / syntax! 21:07:43 * ScottK is sort of here too. 21:07:45 ansgar: non/free-firm/ware 21:08:18 $$$-firmware 21:08:23 oh, and add some \ for profit 21:09:06 right, so next 21:09:16 #topic architectures 21:09:30 first, since last meeting here, sparc (and squeeze) is gone 21:09:39 but there was stuff in pipeline to come in 21:09:40 And mips64el arrived. 21:09:59 so, most of that is dealt with 21:10:29 thats nice 21:10:41 #info yay, sparc gone, mips64el in 21:10:46 #topic dak multi-db 21:10:54 the mhy wanted to kick the paultag with this 21:10:58 so what happened? 21:11:20 I think I did, but I can't remember the outcome 21:11:27 (this blocks the security removal foo after p-u) 21:11:28 paultag: when you're next here, can you ping one of us? 21:11:36 paultag: regarding the multi-db stuff 21:11:46 .oO(the paultag should just reorganize his time :) ) 21:12:32 #topic #787338 21:12:40 mhy: did you nag the lintian people? 21:13:20 you wrote to the bug, but to lintian?) 21:13:56 I could have sworn I wrote to the lintian people too 21:14:13 Cc: 786946@bugs.debian.org 21:14:28 #action mhy to recheck his sentmail folder and if not ping lintian people 21:14:41 soo, i think whats left from last agenda is 21:14:52 it's definitely in the bts in their bug 21:14:55 #topic zfsonlinux 21:15:05 which we had discussions at debconf, so its more a report point 21:15:10 ansgar: could you summarise? 21:15:49 I think we agreed on shipping it in contrib. 21:16:10 Mostly as the situtation for pre-built binary packages is unclear. 21:16:13 as dkms 21:16:41 We don't want people to install bla-dkms (from main) on an appliance and get something that might or might not be redistributable. 21:16:45 #info zfsonlinux to go into contrib as dkms only thing. 21:17:00 did anybody tell the maintainer? :) 21:17:06 I think not yet. 21:17:11 can you? 21:17:57 I can try, but I don't really get much done in the last weeks :/ 21:18:04 Not really settled in yet. 21:18:16 #action ansgar to talk to the zfsonlinux people to ensure they really get it wrong the first time :) 21:18:40 #topic php 21:18:45 have we got any more on this? 21:19:48 (i dont think so, but i may have missed it) 21:20:47 ansgar, mhy: ? dont run away :) 21:21:52 this just needed a statement according to our notes 21:22:22 but doesnt look like anyone managed to get this prepared yet 21:22:59 #info php statement needs someone to prepare and then get it out, whoever wants feel free to take up and coordinate with ftp team 21:23:01 so there 21:23:12 #topic any other topics? 21:23:30 not that I know of, unless we want to pointlessly bikeshed about bikesheds 21:23:47 As ports.d.o was mentioned in the last meeting: 21:23:50 ohyes, we need that not only on the list 21:24:12 I started work on import-repository to import the offical archive into a second dak instance for ports.d.o. 21:24:16 But it still needs work. 21:24:39 #info work on dak for ports.d.o is slowly going forward 21:24:42 It can already import stuff, but it needs some more housekeeping and handling overrides too. 21:24:49 are there a list of missing items / features? 21:25:29 The "Things to think about" in dak/import_repository.py and not all options are implemented. 21:25:36 ok 21:26:07 I think that's everything from my pov 21:26:19 right. my bikesheds foo is going slowly, but steadily forward too. im moving stuff from dak admins command right now, to some daklib files 21:26:44 and when that still works, i merge my branch and then its "just" filling the stubs in the commands.py file for real action 21:27:13 plus loads of make-it-nicer work later - that is, things like "dont rerun packages/contents for unchanged suites 21:27:21 (or general dinstall/buildd handling there) 21:28:03 anyone could jump in and submit code (+hint*) :) 21:28:20 Oh, and we need to look at testing the debug packages foo too. 21:28:42 #info bikesheds going forward, volunteers for coding always welcome 21:28:53 #info need to test debug packages archive too 21:29:20 #info next meeting 18th October, 21UTC 21:29:28 #endmeeting