09:00:23 #startmeeting 09:00:23 Meeting started Tue Jun 14 09:00:23 2016 UTC. The chair is matthieucan. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:00:23 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 09:00:29 #chair orestis 09:00:29 Current chairs: matthieucan orestis 09:00:37 #topic gsoc - ping 09:01:06 pong 09:01:21 pong 09:01:32 #topic gsoc - next meeting 09:01:37 next week, same time? 09:01:42 works for me 09:01:45 :) 09:01:46 same here 09:01:57 #topic gsoc - review 09:02:14 I'm not really happy that we didn't merge anything at this point... 09:02:16 devoxel: you're up 09:03:11 so I sent out that email, that contains most of, just worked away on templating for the past week 09:04:00 yes I saw it. But we also need to focus on continuously integrating your work, or it will become too complicated 09:04:39 and the templates PR is getting huge. We sjould probably merge sources and then focus on the other blueprints 09:04:48 +1 09:05:20 devoxel: did you see my last email from 10mins ago? howcome you didn't spot this issue while testing your patch? 09:06:42 matthieucan: saw the email, i dunno it got past me :L 09:06:57 And yeah I can break down the PR and make it into more byte sized chunks 09:07:12 (^ the templates PR that is) 09:07:18 always rely on visual feedback for every page you touch, since it's not really tested in the testsuite 09:07:48 are there blockers currently? 09:07:56 besides jquery version 09:08:37 no, not really 09:09:14 just stuff to do :P 09:09:19 it's really not acceptable that the only mergeable PR doesn't change much but is blocked because it introduces regressions 09:09:56 so just make it work, and we'll move on 09:10:33 same for things like whitespace. Reread your diff before submitting, to prevent yet another review iteration 09:10:34 no worrys :) I'll do more visual testing before hand 09:12:07 other points? you're supposed to lead this part of the meeting 09:12:49 What did ye think of my plan for the week in the email? 09:13:01 let me reread 09:14:15 is javascript necessary? given that nothing is merged yet, and only a small pr is about to be merged, I would only focus on the responsiveness 09:14:20 unless it's js for that 09:14:45 orestis: what do you think? 09:15:28 yes i afree that we need to avoid js at least now 09:15:38 matthieucan: probably most of my work will end up going into fixing stuff so maybe not necessary) 09:15:49 sry don't have the email on hand right now. 09:16:28 devoxel: do you think pr#61 will be mergeable today? 09:16:55 matthieucan: yeah. by the end of my work anyway 09:17:05 well probably a lot earliar 09:17:06 you're more and more behind schedule, and you must do something about it 09:18:38 I got more than 50% of templating done, but I agree that I need to get things into mergable quality and quicker 09:18:58 yes, if it's not mergeable quality, it's not done 09:19:29 and your last devlog contained barely information on what you do 09:19:46 its already hard to follow your schedule so please at least keep that up to date 09:19:53 yes, I mentioned that in an email yesterday. It was fine at the beginning and items are fading away 09:20:08 Yes the last few devlogs were less informative, I'll keep up on that :) 09:20:38 it's supposed to benefit you, so no excuse :) 09:20:51 any other technical point? 09:22:00 Not on the tip of my toungue :P 09:22:08 *tongue 09:22:33 so I think you know what to do. Make the first things work perfectly and iterate on the templates from that 09:22:38 agree? 09:22:47 yes, makes sense 09:23:02 great. 09:23:11 #topic gsoc - misc 09:23:20 devoxel: orestis: ? 09:23:31 matthieucan: what do you think of sourcesdev atm? 09:23:32 should we discuss about milestones before mid term/ 09:23:32 ? 09:23:37 same for you orestis 09:23:46 also yes milestones would be good :) 09:24:44 honestly i was expecting it to be a bit more beautiful. imho there is work to do on buttons, icons etc. but probably best to focus first on responsivness 09:24:58 where could I improve? 09:25:52 just user interactivity points? 09:26:08 I agree it's a good beginning, that you can improve comparing with the normal version. Random example: the navbar is too tall 09:27:05 things are weird for window width=770px 09:27:11 and it's all in the details, etc 09:27:55 but really, I'll look in details to give feedback once the first pr is merged, and we can move on from there 09:28:22 okay, no problem 09:28:35 so what do you think about milestones? 09:28:46 for your gsoc you mean? 09:29:10 yeah 09:29:28 which milestones? if you updated the wiki, I have no idea 09:30:07 I mean: what do you think about setting new milestones for mid-review, and thoughts on this 09:30:09 i think milestones before gsoc midterm he means 09:30:56 i think you should propose first what you think you can do before midterm 09:31:19 I think it's of course a great idea to set milestones. Feel free to propose us a list of things that need to be done with the midterm as a deadline 09:31:44 but I didn't see this list, or did I miss it? 09:31:57 Should I do it in an email? 09:32:29 that would be great, yes 09:32:32 matthieucan: i think its a reference to the email we sent. what are we evalutating at midterm? 09:33:09 midterm evaluations happen next week I think, so yeah I'll send out an email. I think I can be done with templating by then, in short. 09:33:14 in theory, that the initial schedule has been respected. In practice, that half of the gsoc work has been done, in good conditions 09:33:29 20-27 of june, yes 09:34:12 okay cool 09:34:19 time is running, so set deadlines and respect them 09:34:35 waiting for your email, then 09:34:38 anything else? 09:35:23 not that I can think of, no. If I think of anything it'll be in the email 09:35:36 orestis: ? 09:35:49 nope 09:36:27 alright then, thanks everybody! 09:36:30 #endmeeting