16:59:04 #startmeeting 16:59:04 Meeting started Tue Apr 26 16:59:04 2016 UTC. The chair is OdyX. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:59:04 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 16:59:09 #chair dondelelcaro 16:59:09 Current chairs: OdyX dondelelcaro 16:59:33 #topic Who is here? 16:59:39 Sam Hartman 16:59:42 Didier Raboud 17:00:11 There was no ping. 17:00:57 do we want to do one now?+ 17:01:00 dondelelcaro, Mithrandir, fil, keithp, aba: please check-in by stating your name 17:01:49 Apparently we have a technical issue; fil cannot speak 17:02:51 Is he identified to nickserv? 17:02:54 That's the normal cause 17:03:08 You need to have a registered nick and be identified to speak on this channel 17:03:33 Tue 19:04:18 -NickServ(services@services.oftc.net)- 3 (online, identified by access list) 17:03:36 about fil. 17:03:51 Is there something one of us could do? 17:04:05 Let's wait until 17:10 anyway for the others to check-in 17:04:14 hi 17:04:26 ah, seems I wasn't identified 17:04:33 Great. One problem less. 17:06:27 I could have sworn that my irssi setup used to deal with that for me ... it must have rotted :-/ 17:07:10 hi, here. 17:07:41 sorry about being late. 17:07:45 <-- Tollef Fog Heen 17:08:26 <-- Philip Hands 17:08:54 It's 19:10 17:08:58 Let's proceed. 17:09:01 #topic Next Meeting? 17:09:14 Options H & M are the current Schwartz winners. 17:09:32 Wed 25 or Thur 26, 18 UTC 17:09:46 both wfm 17:10:04 Both are crappy for me. 17:10:43 Aww, apparently I didn't update my availabilities. 17:10:54 It's hard to find a date that works. 17:10:55 well then do:-) 17:11:12 Do you want to wait for me to update this, or do we proceed asynchronously ? 17:11:35 Don generally made the final decision on meeting date near middle of month 17:12:08 yeah, just update availability and we'll figure it out via email. 17:12:23 Okay. Will do that shortly after the meeting. 17:12:37 #action All to update your May, June & July availabilities. 17:12:39 #save 17:12:58 I'll announce the meeting date tomorrow. 17:13:07 #topic Further CTTE Nominees 17:13:45 The status is we have one seat left to fill & received new nominations. 17:14:14 Do we want to set a deadline for folks to give comments? 17:14:15 I think it's fair to take these new nominations into account for a new round. 17:14:41 hartmans: nominees, or TC members ? 17:14:56 last round it was hard to get candidates to stand, do we have an idea how to round up more/different candidates? 17:15:22 I'm open to suggestions. 17:15:50 Last round, quite some were nominated by ourselves. 17:15:59 Which worked so-so. 17:16:33 I meant tc members. 17:17:03 maybe poking folks in-person at debconf can help 17:17:18 Yeah. That's an interesting question. Do we want to decide before debconf 17:17:23 or do we want to hold things open and 17:17:33 Yes. So, with Don's term expiry at the end of this year, do we want to fill this seat now, or wait ? 17:17:34 1) discuss what we're looking for at debconf and 2) poke people in person at debconf 17:17:58 My personal preference would be to fill after debconf--possibly after Don's term expires 17:18:21 maybe have it as part of the ctte bof, a "we're looking for new folks, here's what we're looking for"? 17:18:38 fil: opinions ? 17:19:00 I like the idea to discuss this at DebConf (iff we're a sufficient share present there). 17:19:18 I don't mean to decide on a person there, I mean to try to find more candidates. 17:19:24 It's not like we have too many subjects currently, so waiting is safe for now. 17:19:33 Mithrandir: yeah, what I meant. 17:19:50 yeah, on the other hand it'd be good to not be too many people down from full. 17:20:04 sure. But we're only one away currently. 17:20:45 OdyX: I've got no opinions re current volunteers, since I have none of the details, so dificult to judge if we should resort to press-ganging at DC 17:21:26 Did the nominations come in after fil got on the list? 17:21:38 yes 17:21:41 okay. It feels we're in agreement that postponing to post-DebConf is good, to get us a wider range of candidacies, right ? 17:22:22 ah, I assumed I was missing things 17:22:55 I think postponing is fine. We should send a mail to the nominees thanking them and giving them information on what the plan is. 17:23:18 Yes. Any volunteer? (I guess that's probably my accountability, right?) 17:23:28 I can deal 17:23:58 I am sitting arcound doing nothing this afternoon. 17:24:02 #agreed Postpone seat-filling to post-DebConf; take DebConf as opportunity to refine who we're looking for, and get more candidacies. 17:24:16 #action hartmans to inform the current candidates of the process we're running. 17:24:24 Anything else for this point ? 17:25:14 thanks, and no, I don't think we need anything else for this. 17:25:38 I'll make a note to put a slide into the bof about looking for folks. 17:25:51 #topic Additional Business 17:26:07 I'll send email but I have an affiliation change 17:26:12 #action Mithrandir to recall the TC about talking about this in our DebConf BoF. 17:26:40 I'm now with Hadron Industries, a small startup. The company is owned by klee. Our product is Debian-based. 17:27:11 #info hartmans has changed employer. 17:27:25 https://bugs.debian.org/tech-ctte <- our list of concerns. 17:27:32 hartmans: good luck. :-) 17:27:34 I'm trying to get travel to debconf. The issue is me fighting with airline scheduling, not funding. I spent a couple of hours on it and failed, I need to find another couple of hours to throw at the problem. 17:27:51 I've worked pre-DC15 to put everything the TC had on his plates as proper bugs. 17:28:36 Now we're down to #766708 (and #771070, related) 17:30:00 As far as I can tell, this issue is still a tension between the protagonist, but has reached a equilibrium point. 17:30:28 I don't think it's a satisfactory point, and would like us to work towards getting this issue solved. 17:30:34 In short, I think we need a champion. 17:31:47 OdyX: thanks for sending me the backlog -- not exactly cheerful reading. I'd be willing to take it on if there's any prospect of it getting somewhere useful 17:32:33 fil: if you're willing to bring a new eye to this situation, that'd be awesome. 17:33:08 A first step (which we already tried and failed) would be to produce a neutral summary of the situation, agreed upon by the sides, and published. 17:33:09 if its likely to just involve rekindling a lot of anger to no purpose, not so much ;-) 17:33:37 fil: I suspect it'll make it flare up a bit, but hopefully to a purpose. 17:33:52 Can we try a series of peer-to-peer meetings at DebConf, to get a better understanding of the issue ? 17:34:14 OdyX: difficult to do when one side seems to be hiding in a bunker 17:34:44 I'd like us to either proceed forward towards a good resolution, or a TC decision. Or explicitely deny, and close the bug. 17:34:52 I'm certainly willing to have a try though 17:34:56 I wouldn't want the TC to do the latter. 17:34:57 I think there's a point past which you hold it against somone that they don't participate in the process. 17:35:06 If doco doesn't want to talk to the other side, we can work with that. 17:35:23 indeed. 17:35:38 If doco isn't willing to work with the TC or appoint someone who represents his view who does, eventually, that should be taken into account. 17:35:49 hartmans: yeah, we need folks to communicate, but we also need folks to not bring out the pitchforks, which historically has been the case for some of the conflicts in Debian. 17:35:50 fil: don't feel constrained in how you want to tackle this issue though. 17:36:11 Right. 17:36:12 fil: can we defer the next action points to you? 17:36:19 I totally get party a not wanting to talk to party b 17:36:26 (including asking for advice either publically, or privately) 17:36:30 I totally get party a not wanting to talk to tc member x 17:36:37 OdyX: OK, sign me up 17:37:00 But if party a can't work with the tc as a whole, etheir a gr is needed because the tc is off the rails, or the tc may act in a manner that praty a may not like 17:37:13 #action fil to revive #766708. 17:37:28 I agree with hartmans' analysis btw. 17:37:47 Good. 17:37:53 ditto, and I hope we can be the grease that helps the wheels go round. 17:37:54 Anything else as #varia ? 17:38:51 not from me 17:39:10 I have written it by mail already, but let's repeat it here: I'm happy to serve as chair, and welcome all sorts of feedback. Feel free to direct your comments/suggestions/complaints to me ! 17:39:11 OdyX: well, congrats on the nice new hat you have found yourself. :-) 17:39:19 Mithrandir: :blush: :) 17:39:58 Great. If there's nothing new; I'll quickly update my availabilites, and will wait for your git updates, so that we can agree on a meeting date! 17:40:07 Thanks for a productive meeting! 17:40:10 #endmeeting