17:59:10 #startmeeting 17:59:10 Meeting started Wed Mar 30 17:59:10 2016 UTC. The chair is dondelelcaro. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:59:10 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 17:59:14 #topic Who is here? 17:59:18 Don Armstrong 17:59:29 OdyX - Didier Raboud 17:59:37 Sam Hartman sent regrets 17:59:53 aba, keithp: ping 18:00:50 Mithrandir: I'm assuming you're still here 18:00:57 I am 18:01:03 #topic Next Meeting? 18:01:08 cool; I'll move right along 18:01:42 sam updated his availability, so the current winners are on Tuesday at 16:00 and 17:00 UTC. 18:02:03 I'd like to apoligize too for letting the meeting slip back an hour; I forgot that everyone would have done DST by now 18:02:10 that should generally work for me. 18:02:31 if anyone has a problem with that, it would be best to update it 18:02:41 s/it/the meeting poll/ 18:02:44 I need to update my availabilities, but it can work 18:03:07 #action everyone to update the meeting poll with their availability 18:03:18 #topic #741573 Menu systems - Debian Policy followup 18:03:30 I've now uploaded this to delayed; sorry for my own delay here 18:03:41 but I think this issue can be closed now 18:03:44 thank you 18:03:46 Good thanks. 18:03:47 and yes, sounds like it, then 18:04:05 #action dondelelcaro to close #741573 with diff of NMU 18:04:06 The inertia of all parties is worrying though 18:04:13 yeah 18:04:42 I'm personally getting woried that we're starting to stagnate as a project 18:04:58 Yes. I have the same worry. 18:04:59 and I'm no exception 18:05:10 Same here 18:05:44 Anyway. Let's move on through the meeting 18:05:46 yep 18:05:51 #topic #797533 New CTTE members 18:06:15 we've got two ballots which have circulated 18:06:22 thanks to OdyX and Sam for pushing on this. 18:06:57 I think we can definitely vote on the first short one, and do a round of voting and run it by the DPL 18:07:06 wfm 18:07:12 Ideally the actual DPL… 18:08:09 Not that I have anything against the next winner, but that'd feel less of a "republican delay " so to say 18:08:15 well, hopefully we can resolve one before the current election cycle 18:08:39 that's my goal, anyway 18:08:51 Yes. We need more TC members than hartmans and myself active there though. 18:08:55 right 18:09:00 while the DPL formally has the power to withold their approval, it feels a lot like rubberstamping 18:09:01 It's not that hard… 18:09:25 OdyX: yeah, it's not. I was meaning to get to it, but I spent the time on the policy stuff instead 18:09:40 Eh. I'm not fingerpointing. 18:09:42 but we should keep it moving forward 18:10:04 Yes. Absolutely 18:10:12 OdyX: no worries; I'm just pointing fingers at myself. ;-) 18:11:35 #action dondelelcaro to send out the short ballot for votes 18:11:38 Good. So #action to work on the ballot together so as to push it to a vote? 18:11:43 Yes. That 18:11:52 #action all to continue discussing the remaining candidates 18:12:06 anything else on this? 18:12:49 moving on 18:12:54 #topic Additional Business 18:13:06 @DebConf I was seriously hoping to get our list of issues to zero … 18:13:21 I think we only have the nominees left? 18:13:35 I'm confident enough that the technical ctte is sane that I won't need to veto any recommendation :) 18:13:38 Now I start to worry if that'd not be a worrying sign … 18:13:56 Maulkin: thanks 18:14:09 Maulkin: but it's always nice to run them by you anyway 18:14:28 Yeah. You never know, a DPL may have concerns about someone. 18:15:17 someone who is going to the next debconf should probably also schedule an event 18:15:33 I'm going. Who else are planning to? 18:15:40 I'm not planning on going (time+$$s), but... 18:16:35 Lots of flying. Dunno 18:16:50 yet… 18:16:56 it's a long flight, but South Africa! 18:17:08 (and 'ork is paying) 18:18:10 anyone have anythign else? 18:18:14 . 18:18:31 Nope 18:18:45 me neither 18:19:01 I'll schedule a "meet the ctte" event 18:19:04 #endmeeting