21:15:24 #startmeeting 21:15:24 Meeting started Sun Dec 22 21:15:24 2013 UTC. The chair is Tincho. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:15:24 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 21:15:27 Done :) 21:15:37 lets go 21:15:48 #topic Call for proposals 21:16:07 So that's the first point in the agenda 21:16:16 Thanks Tincho 21:16:22 The text seems done, but we are stuck because of the contact mail :( 21:16:33 Have we the email and the domain? 21:16:34 So, what are we needing for that? 21:16:50 tassia sent a mail today 21:17:11 she has contacted with ganeff to ask for it 21:17:21 but we don't know if marga did it before 21:17:21 MeetBot: pingall The meeting has started! 21:17:21 The meeting has started! 21:17:21 alexm deavid dunetna frangor jordi marcfp_ marga maxmil MeetBot moray papapep sim6 sto Tincho vorlon zumbi 21:17:21 The meeting has started! 21:18:00 #info RfP is blocked on contact email 21:18:28 since tassia asked for it just toda, we could wait for 3 or 4 more days 21:18:53 but if not i would look for an alternative 21:19:04 maybe probeta.net could have a private list? 21:19:27 or maybe another list in cpl 21:19:40 I'd propose waiting for a definite answer on this, and otherwise going for probeta or another private domain 21:19:49 (I can host a mail domain too) 21:20:15 but maybe we should have a limit date 21:20:33 this is becoming capital, a real stopper for the rest... 21:20:40 yes, the problem is this is christmas week 21:20:55 qq: do we have confirmation on the location already? 21:21:16 Tincho, the venue? yes 21:21:27 ok. last time I checked it was not definite 21:21:32 even if we could send the cfp this week, i'm not sure that its a great week to to it. 21:21:42 Might be better to wait for the new year. 21:21:55 This would give us more time to get the mail sorted. 21:22:00 we need to start publicizing the event asap 21:22:05 tassia was proposing to have a limit date for proposals, se was suggesting 20th January 21:22:23 that's really, really late... 21:22:30 oh, sorry, for proposals 21:22:36 misunderstood the sentence 21:22:56 if the limit is going to be end of january, the cfp should be sent before EoY 21:22:59 yes, i meant that if we have that date, we would only have 20 days for proposals 21:23:27 well, it's a "flexibl" date, but still... 21:23:27 considering we don't have already sent the cfp, it's impossible to have a so short term to receive them... 21:24:24 proposal: let's wait until the 26th for the mail situation. and go with an alternative solution if we cannot sort it by that date 21:24:37 so we can aim to send the RfP next weekend 21:24:45 with no knowledge about organizing this kind of events, is there any problem to allow proposals until, i.e., middle or end of february? 21:25:13 end of february seem too late for me 21:25:16 papapep: one big problem is people procrastinating until the last minute 21:25:26 and we need to organise video 21:25:29 and create schedules 21:25:30 etc 21:25:43 I get it 21:25:43 better to say 20th of Jan and then extend it if necessary 21:26:03 i think we could send the cfp on 29th at maximum (with or without debian mail) 21:26:16 ok. can we agree on a schedule? 21:26:21 and have the limit date for proposals on 31st of January 21:27:22 26th limit for debian mail, 29th limit for sending, 31st Jan limit for proposals. 21:27:38 if there's no other way out, I can buy i.e., minidebconfbcn2014.org and if somebody can host the mail domain, solved 21:27:50 yes 21:27:53 we can't wait much more for this 21:27:59 so, what maxmil said sounds reasonable for all? 21:28:10 +1 21:28:12 i can ask to cpl and probeta if we can have a private list, just in case we dont have the debian one 21:28:19 fine for me 21:28:26 +1 for maxmil proposal 21:29:07 ok 21:29:09 #agree Schedule to go forward with CfP: 26/12 limit for getting an email address, 29/12 limit for sending CfP, 31/1 limit for proposals. 21:29:19 something else on this point? 21:29:39 next? 21:29:41 #topic Sponsor's team status 21:30:00 So, what's the status on this? 21:30:25 Anyone here from the Sponsor team? 21:30:28 Alex said that there was a request to a company 21:30:31 I have not started the crowfounding stuff yet. 21:30:45 sim6: do you need help with that? 21:30:56 the request is to an association :) 21:31:01 I want to do it next week. 21:31:12 Tincho: yes, please. 21:31:26 Catalan LInux User group (CALIU) 21:31:33 sim6: ok, we can talk later about this 21:31:46 Tincho: ok 21:31:52 AFAIK, we need to have some sort of website for that to happen 21:32:20 do we have news about funding from debconf, google, or other usual suspects? 21:32:26 no 21:32:29 Tincho: yes we need a cool website. 21:32:35 #action Tincho will help sim6 with crowdfunding efforts 21:33:00 sponsorship team members are not here :( 21:33:01 #info No major news from sponsors team 21:33:09 ok, let's defer to next meeting 21:33:16 except sim6 21:33:28 next? 21:33:31 next 21:33:32 #topic Web and useful information 21:33:42 Maybe we can talk about website with artwork stuff. 21:33:47 one moment please 21:34:00 i have something to say about sponsorship 21:34:08 #undo 21:34:08 Removing item from minutes: 21:34:23 #topic Sponsor's team status 21:34:33 dunetna: sorry for the rush :) 21:34:34 tassia said if we should ask talkers for how much money they ask for 21:34:47 in cfp 21:35:20 i said that maybe is too soon... 21:35:34 but if you think it's ok to ask this in cfp, np for me 21:35:46 I'd like to say about that that sponsoring is complicated. I'd not try to offer it too widely 21:35:48 probably it would be better to wait to talk about this 21:36:13 then the cfp text should be changed 21:36:13 as Tincho says 21:36:40 please, read tassia mail with her opinion 21:36:45 maybe the cfp could have a note saying that people who cannot attend otherwise should contact us privately. But I would really not make it something too easy, we will not have the money or the manpower to handle it 21:37:16 http://llistes.cpl.upc.edu/pipermail/debian-miniconf/2013-December/000168.html 21:37:38 dunetna: I've read it, but I think that it might be too optimistic to think of sponsoring people from outside europe, save for one or two exceptions 21:38:03 i agree 21:38:10 this is a miniconf, after all 21:38:39 so then, we should remove that part from cfp 21:38:53 I think just stating that we are working to have some sponsors and that we'll inform about it in the future is enough for now 21:38:56 to not create expectatives 21:39:01 exactly 21:39:25 papapep: i think the previous text was saying something like that 21:39:50 yes, I think the current version is too inviting to ask for sponsorship 21:40:17 everybody agree to remove that part and only suggest that we may have soe money? 21:40:23 +1 21:40:34 +1 21:40:52 no objections, so... 21:41:05 its fine for me 21:41:22 +1 21:41:23 #agreed To modify the CfP to remove the invitation to ask for sponsoring, and only suggest the possibility 21:42:03 next? 21:42:04 now, we can go to next topic :) 21:42:08 #topic Sponsor's team status 21:42:10 ok 21:42:10 sorry 21:42:13 #undo 21:42:13 Removing item from minutes: 21:42:18 #topic Web and useful information 21:42:28 i put this topic 21:42:41 We need a cool template... 21:42:44 I started to add some useful info 21:42:47 We need a hosting... 21:42:51 but 21:43:09 i don't know if we should wait to have another webpage 21:43:21 hosting can be the debconf infrastructure. I can provide if this is too complicated 21:43:22 for instance, i wantesd to add a registration page 21:43:32 dunetna: right, we need something asap 21:43:52 dunetna: we can always do like the paris folks and have a few wikipages 21:44:05 it's what are we doing now 21:44:26 but i don't want to do the work twice :) 21:44:29 yes, minus a domain 21:44:42 so, if debian wiki is ok, np 21:45:09 It is a bit weird that it is not the debconf wiki, but it is still fine for me 21:45:22 a standalone site is nicer, but we need to focus our efforts too :) 21:45:26 we can trasnlate everythin to debconf wiki 21:45:31 (and we can always switch later) 21:45:32 Tincho, +1 21:45:42 s/translate/move 21:45:53 that too, it is not too much work 21:46:08 a few good structured wiki pages can be fine 21:46:26 forgive my ignorance, whats a debconf wiki? 21:46:29 marga started the wii in debconf site, I suggested to do it in d-w page 21:46:36 but we can move it again 21:46:39 maxmil: it is just another wiki, hosted in debconf.org 21:46:50 dunetna: I have no strong opinion on that 21:46:57 it's just the usual way it is done 21:47:39 yes, i'm changing my opinion 21:47:52 and i think it's better to have it in debconf.org wiki 21:48:03 we don't have to be different to other debconfs 21:48:18 then, proposed agree: Move the pages to the debconf wiki, get a domain pointing at the right page. Create a standalone website if we have the time/interest later. 21:48:37 +1 21:48:40 I agree 21:48:41 ok 21:48:42 +1 21:48:57 #agree to move the pages to the debconf wiki, get a domain pointing at the right page. Create a standalone website if we have the time/interest later. 21:49:08 something else on this topic? 21:49:27 who offers to do this? 21:49:42 Mónica: seeing as we are on the web team i'll take this one 21:49:49 maxmil: you and me are in the web team ;) 21:50:11 If you need more hands I can join us. 21:50:14 ok, we were thinking the same, we can coordinate and do it 21:50:20 yep 21:50:30 #action maxmil and dunetna will do the move and get the domain 21:50:31 thanks sim6 21:50:32 s/us/you/ 21:51:18 just a small note on this: both the domain and the email address are to be asked to debconf admins.. if ganneff is not answering there is still other people, or the mailing list 21:51:23 Tincho: what we have to do to get the domain? 21:51:31 ok, I join you 21:51:39 dunetna: just ask debconf admins 21:51:48 ok 21:52:05 I think sgran and weasel are still admins 21:52:15 but that might be outdated 21:52:18 anyway, next? 21:52:25 what list? 21:52:34 dunetna: debconf-team 21:52:39 On last meeting Tassia said she would, so ask she first 21:52:39 ok, thanks 21:52:47 ok 21:52:55 sorry 21:53:32 #topic Date of next meeting 21:53:56 5th? 21:54:04 I would wait until January 12th 21:54:18 but, i think we should use more the list 21:54:25 indeed 21:54:38 and don't wait for these meeting to decide things 21:54:40 12th with more movement on the list sounds good. 21:54:46 no problem for me 21:54:46 +1 21:54:47 +1 21:54:48 it is 3 weeks away 21:54:56 but if everybody agrees :) 21:55:04 the 27th we should talk about the mail item in the list 21:55:07 same time? 21:55:10 yes but the 5th it's not a good idea 21:55:31 Tincho: yes, same time 22h 21:55:50 CET 21:56:29 #agreed Next meeting to be held on 12/1/14 at 22h CET 21:56:29 there are a lot of topics we should talk about (spreading the word and more) 21:56:49 #action Let's use more the mailing list, as there is a big gap before next meeting. 21:56:57 so, please, we should discuss more in the list :) 21:57:22 #topic AoB 21:57:33 2 minutes left for any other business 21:57:34 sorry for being so annoying 21:57:40 dunetna: you are totally right 21:58:08 On this, I think we really need to start working on spreading the word 21:58:15 yes 21:58:22 we need a text and maybe a logo 21:58:35 but if we have no logo, i think we can do it as well 21:58:41 whatever we can get, but asap. and start pushing it though the interwebs 21:59:07 I am talking privately with everybody I know that might be interested, but it is not enough 21:59:10 maybe we should wait until the domain/wiki movement 21:59:25 yes 21:59:39 in any case, this is just a reminder, we don't need to discuss here 21:59:41 maxmil: sim6: could we say a date to have the web more or less decent? 22:00:00 it is also a requirement for the crowdfunding 22:00:04 i mean the new wiki 22:00:33 we are out of time.. 22:00:36 This week I can work on it. 22:00:40 migrating the wiki pages shouldn't be too hard. 22:00:45 ok, we can finish th meeting 22:00:57 and discuss this out of meeting 22:01:00 Thanks Tincho you are a good chair ;) 22:01:01 #endmeeting