15:03:33 #startmeeting 15:03:33 Meeting started Mon Jul 31 15:03:33 2023 UTC. The chair is wouter. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:03:33 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 15:03:51 agenda at https://deb.li/ipVeE 15:04:04 #topic roll call 15:04:14 \o 15:04:17 well we just did that, I suppose :) 15:04:30 o/ 15:05:10 0/ 15:05:19 I'm guessing there isn't going to be anyone who joined in the last five or so minutes 15:05:27 #topic DC23 - Venue 15:05:48 what's the status of that? do we know everything we need to know? 15:06:10 paperwork has been signed and money has changed hands. So we have a venue :) 15:06:16 yay 15:06:22 maybe even two of them 15:06:36 yay yay then, I guess? 15:06:55 is there anything else we need to discuss about that, or shall we move on? 15:07:29 #topic DC23 - Equipment 15:07:32 our locals here aren't currently connected (hacksk[m]1, kannan[m]) 15:07:36 right 15:07:52 I saw a message from olasd pass by on email wrt budget approval for new hardware 15:08:02 don't know whether that's been approved yet? 15:08:08 no response yet 15:08:10 olasd: I suggest an IRC ping 15:08:16 yeah, I will do that 15:08:25 highvoltage is on this channel... 15:08:32 he'd missed our sprint budget email 15:08:42 there is that too 15:08:58 nothing else on this topic? 15:09:04 Do we want to buy more of those ASUS boards? 15:09:13 that was in the budget request 15:09:15 pollo: yeah (they're in the requested budget) 15:09:19 Ah cool 15:09:25 I've also added the audio interfaces mentioned yesterday 15:09:55 #topic DC23 - Shipping 15:10:10 I understand some of that is depending on the budget approval? 15:10:21 they are cheap, though 15:10:30 so we have every reason to assume we'll get them 15:11:05 olasd: is there anything noteworthy on shipping? 15:12:06 nope (except I have flights booked now) 15:12:23 okay 15:12:27 #topic DC23 - Networking 15:12:49 again, not much happening here without our locals 15:12:55 okay 15:13:02 #topic DC23 - Loop 15:13:48 Tammy did some initial work during the sprint, has all her elements, needs to work on bringing it together into an animation but has not yet had time for that 15:13:57 (there is time, no stress, we'll get there) 15:14:12 #topic Sprint post-mortem 15:14:29 We sprinted! 15:14:30 I think that went well? 15:14:46 Don't forget to send your reimbursement request to your TO :) 15:14:50 #info a summary of the sprint is at https://grep.be/blog/en/computer/debian/DebConf_Videoteam_Sprint_in_Paris/ 15:14:55 Done :P 15:15:11 #action everyone to send reimbursement requests to the right TO (if that hasn't happened yet) 15:15:14 I've received a mail from April, they're looking for feedback, anything of note I should tell them? 15:15:32 you sent them the link to my blogpost? 15:15:35 (I've already shared the link to the post, nice work on framing the picture :-)) 15:15:40 heh :) sure 15:16:12 yeah, I guess I need to fix that a little bit... but more important things to do than to fight with CSS 15:16:15 " en plus sur la photo on voit bien Chapril, April, Libre à vous :)" 15:16:29 ah, no, I meant the actual picture 15:16:34 I hadn't even noticed the overflow :D 15:16:50 oh, that -- I missed that, but yeah 15:17:42 I think they were very nice hosts, even giving us some fruit, no complaints there 15:17:47 :D 15:17:49 other than that... 15:18:01 Hon, chapril.org is pretty cute 15:18:20 #topic AOB 15:19:13 thoughts on remote presentation at dc23? 15:19:15 see the list posts 15:19:38 I am not opposed to remote presentations, although I guess I'm a minority 15:19:57 that said, FOSDEM tried a "hybrid" approach this year, and my humble opinion is that it was a waste of time 15:20:24 so perhaps it's a good idea to say we don't really like the idea, which is what most of the team has already done 15:21:38 all I'd have to say on list is "AOL" 15:22:01 #agreed we don't think that remote presentations work well for an in-person debconf 15:22:10 anything else? 15:22:55 maybe this needs a manpower commitment from the content team? 15:23:16 wdym? 15:23:26 video team has the gear, and can help with the technical side, but we can't staff all the work thta needs to be done to make it happen 15:23:50 that would require us to train them really, which is almost the same amount of work? 15:24:04 or am I way off base here? 15:25:01 there is a lot of handholding, reviewing videos, working with presenters to do beforehand 15:25:07 typically far too much of that gets left to us 15:25:23 oh, that part 15:25:27 mm, sure, perhaps that's true 15:25:58 when it comes to the actual talk, if we've set it up and the speaker is ready to go, it *should* be relatively straightforward 15:26:09 we could play it that way, yes. And then if the content team doesn't want to do the work, they have their answer as to whether it will happen 15:27:12 #agreed if remote presentations are wanted, volunteers to handle the pre-event QA for prerecordings would be required 15:27:28 is that a reasonable summary? 15:27:39 sure 15:27:44 anything else then? 15:28:55 #topic Next meeting 15:29:10 same time same place next week? 15:29:20 +1 15:29:55 #agreed same time same place next week 15:30:02 #endmeeting