16:57:57 #startmeeting 16:57:57 Meeting started Mon Aug 21 16:57:57 2023 UTC. The chair is pwaring. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:57:57 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 16:58:00 #topic Roll call 16:58:05 as always, say hi if you're here 16:58:26 o/ 16:58:33 Hi 16:58:33 \O 16:58:42 say hi if you're here 16:58:45 Hii o/ 16:58:54 hi 16:59:07 Say netsplit, too. Welcome to IRC 16:59:35 hi 17:00:10 hi (allepey local guy from the other day , first time here, don't mind me) 17:00:31 nattie and a few others are on the other side of the netsplit, just FYI / for the log 17:00:49 hi klcoder, nice to meet you! 17:01:07 #topic Finance: Second installment payment for Debconf 23 venue 17:01:28 <[pirate]praveen> hi 17:01:28 no news there 17:01:29 It is with SPI 17:01:43 * tumbleweed will prod them now 17:01:50 hi! wish i had known earlier that debconf was in kochi 17:01:50 Pinged them couple of days ago.. No update 17:01:59 #info Second installment payment invoice is still with SPI 17:02:02 hi if we're all here 17:02:03 I'm happy to poke them too if that would help 17:02:29 #topic Finance: Sponsorship 17:02:31 Yes.. Poking them will help.. Hotel people are inquiring 17:02:51 any changes to sponsorship since last time? 17:03:12 we have some new sponsors, 3x Bronze iirc 17:03:52 great 17:03:56 good seems like we'll need every bit we can get 17:04:15 #link https://debconf23.debconf.org/sponsors/ 17:04:19 and it's good that we get more Indian sponsors (these three are "local") 17:04:27 too late to be on the t-shirts? :) 17:04:46 <[pirate]praveen> bronze don't go on t shirts 17:04:46 Bronze :o) 17:04:46 ah 17:05:03 anything else on sponsors? 17:05:29 Anisa[m] is going to do a sponsor loop with highvoltage (loopy) \o/ 17:05:30 (other than swag, which is on the next item) 17:05:42 <[pirate]praveen> 3 stalls they asked, so we need to find space for them 17:05:45 "with"... highvoltage? 17:05:55 well, you are Mr. Loopy, not? 17:06:15 yeah I think she's going to produce the video on her own though 17:06:19 Also would be nice to see you on the vid ... thinking of it :D 17:06:50 DLange: haha yeahh i confirm \o/ 17:07:05 #topic Finance: Import of swags from sponsors 17:07:31 I'll wait for people to rejoin 17:07:58 I would not have leaked the info had you not confirmed earlier :) 17:08:33 last time the only item on swag was that Canonical had not decided whether to send swag or bring with them 17:08:39 is there anything else we need to discuss on that? 17:09:10 They are sending Tea coasters. 17:10:01 Local team member got enquiry from customs, I guess the shipment is on it's way. 17:10:01 they jumped on to the tea meme? ok that gets them some more sponsors brownie points! 17:10:11 brownies with tea sound good 17:10:36 "beermats" for those from olden times :) 17:11:08 okay, last finance item coming up 17:11:19 #topic Finance: Budget update 17:12:25 we have sent an updated budget request 17:12:46 Revised budget just sent to DPL. 17:13:03 I can immediately revise it further, the income side was out of date :) 17:13:08 we saved some money with the hotel.. but we need some extra cash else where.. in total it is less than our initial request 17:13:10 but that's only a 2k difference 17:13:59 but we are still in negative due to reduced sponsorship 17:14:19 I'd advice to run the budget by the treasuer(s) before sending for approval 17:14:26 if I'm reading it correctly, we're in negative by -$47k USD? 17:14:36 even just to get another pair of eyes on it 17:14:37 about 46k 17:14:40 *advise 17:15:02 srud: so, I know the background of some of the changes but not all of them 17:15:19 would you say it's mostly because things costed more than expected when we first budgeted? 17:15:58 I don't think we're adding any new expensive items to the event 17:16:00 tshirt cost more, we have some additional swags.. some transport requests were more than expected 17:16:33 *transport charges 17:16:47 right 17:17:31 also added couple of missed items 17:17:47 I'll go through it in more depth after the meeting 17:17:55 thanks tumbleweed 17:17:59 I will send an in depth explanation too 17:18:12 the budget is about the same as it was in December 17:18:14 doesn't need to be in depth 17:18:21 just a few sentences to explain 17:18:23 seems more a case of expected income being less than anticipated 17:18:28 rather than commit messages titeld "budget update" 17:18:42 highvoltage: yeah, we didn't hit sponsorship targets 17:18:43 so we're in the red 17:18:45 also forgot that we are going for 400 swags instead of initial 300 17:18:51 ok, shall we move on then if that's going to be handled after the meeting 17:18:54 srud: right! 17:19:04 in december it was "USD 226,471.21 expenses" and in the last email it was "USD 220,746.27 expenses" so if anything total expenses are a bit less 17:19:28 that's because the hotel is down to 90% capacity 17:20:00 DLange: yeah, but the bottom line is that the deficit isn't because of a total increase in costs 17:20:07 no 17:20:17 most costs have increased, but not that significantly 17:20:24 and the big one: the venue: decreased 17:21:15 either way, I consider USD220k and USD226k not that far apart at all 17:21:23 yep 17:21:34 #topic Registration: Numbers and room allocations for hotel 17:21:37 speaking of venues... 17:21:52 we've done the room assignments 17:22:01 and passed them along to the hotel 17:22:04 and numbers... why 90% occupency? is it because we couldn't fill the rooms? 17:22:11 numbers can be seen on the statistics page 17:22:38 highvoltage: yeah, we hit our threshold bursary approval score 17:22:44 and hadn't filled all the rooms, yet 17:22:57 #link https://debconf23.debconf.org/register/statistics/ 17:23:48 also we can were allowed 10% difference in the contract 17:23:52 if the assignments are done, and the deadline has passed, is there anything we need to agree/discuss on this? 17:24:18 do we see the room assignments in wafer now? 17:24:30 DLange: room numbers haven't been issued yet, so no 17:24:38 I don't know if the hotel will even issue them before the event? 17:24:52 ok, surprise party :) 17:24:57 our system of telling people who their room mates are depends on having a room number 17:25:04 tumbleweed: will check with them when they can share room numbers 17:25:10 we could always use random temporary numbers... 17:25:29 we know who's paired, at any rate 17:26:01 so we'll make stand-in numbers if necessary 17:26:18 how do decide? when? 17:26:59 by the end of the week? 17:27:04 yes 17:27:09 cool! 17:27:31 #agreed room number assignments (real or stand-in) to be added by the end of the week 17:27:36 anything else on this? 17:27:39 nope 17:27:56 #topic Bursaries 17:28:08 <[pirate]praveen> one more thing lefy 17:28:11 bursaries continue to be all done 17:28:15 * nattie has to head off now; rehearsal 17:28:23 I have a point in registarion 17:28:28 ok, i have a sec 17:28:31 <[pirate]praveen> we have 30+ more pending registration 17:28:46 <[pirate]praveen> after we accepted everyone 17:28:51 should we or shouldnt we approve? 17:29:01 right now we're at 347 approved, 299 reconfirmed 17:29:03 are they locals? 17:29:06 highvoltage: yeah 17:29:25 if you think the hotel can take more, I'd say approve more 17:29:33 if you think we're getting close to the limit, approve selectively 17:29:45 chances are a lot of those are not for the whole duration anyway but for a few days here and there 17:29:52 probably the weekends? 17:29:55 so i'd say yes if you think we can? 17:30:04 are we doing cancel registrations for people who didnt accept? 17:30:17 srud: bursaries, I assume 17:30:41 if so, we could get how many we seats we already filed 17:31:00 tumbleweed: also people who said cant attend without bursary 17:31:26 <[pirate]praveen> 30+ is a good buffer to account for people cancelling/not turning up I think 17:31:47 *nod* especially since they don't need visas or extensive travel 17:32:07 srud: the ones who said they can't attend without a bursary were cancelled 17:32:30 ok.. I thought i saw cancelled was zero 17:32:37 may be my oversight 17:33:02 they show up as denied 17:33:08 I think 17:33:38 oh, not even that 17:33:40 denied is zero 17:33:40 we just delete their registration 17:33:47 denied isn't 0 17:34:02 ohhh 17:34:05 I'll set them to cancelled 17:34:32 anything else on registration / bursaries? 17:35:29 nothing from my side 17:36:39 #topic Visas 17:36:53 security / political clearances 17:37:06 <[pirate]praveen> we are hoping political clearance by tomorrow 17:37:28 <[pirate]praveen> some countries we had to remove from list as that would critically delay the clearance 17:37:38 <[pirate]praveen> invitation letters we hope by wednesday 17:37:59 <[pirate]praveen> we will still try if they can be cleared later, but not much hope on that 17:38:28 <[pirate]praveen> we have been talking to them on phone almost every day on last few days 17:38:30 <_rene_> ooc, which countries? 17:38:57 <[pirate]praveen> countries which don't have good relation with India 17:39:15 <[pirate]praveen> if we insist this could delay clearance for everyone 17:40:01 let's be transparent to the team here: The problematic countries are: Taiwan, China, Iran, and Golon Heights 17:40:11 #info some countries removed from list for clearance, invitation letters hopefully by Wednesday 17:40:12 <[pirate]praveen> we have shared that with individuals who are affected 17:40:40 is there anything we need to agree at this point? it sounds like everything is in hand and there's not much we can do either way 17:40:54 srud: I've expired all the bursaries that weren't accepted yet 17:41:07 <_rene_> tumbleweed: ok, I guessed China already correctly. Iran is unsurpsingly there either 17:41:19 yeah, suprising 17:41:28 tumbleweed: ok.. also I see only 16 on the attendee review page 17:41:36 <_rene_> (I'd have assumed Pakistan, too, but Pakistan probably wouldn't have had a chance from the beginning anyway ;)) 17:42:10 <[pirate]praveen> hopefully in 2 days we have clarity on visa question 17:42:16 ok, let's move on then 17:42:19 _rene_: I don't think we had any applicants 17:42:27 #topic Swag 17:42:40 not sure if this is a duplicate item? do we need to agree anything on swag? 17:43:09 <[pirate]praveen> this is for swag bag 17:43:11 Some orders are ready to ship, some needs approval for final printing. 17:43:27 is this Debian swag rather sponsor swag? 17:43:30 <[pirate]praveen> first one was for sponsors sending swags 17:43:37 pwaring: yes 17:43:53 This is about DebConf swag kit from Debian. 17:44:25 For some payments we had to borrow from local team members like Utkarsh and Syam. 17:44:57 As it was critical to start production. Hoping to get it reimbursed from SPI, or other TOs. 17:45:15 anupa: yeah. This is how local expenses are usually handled 17:45:23 Ok 17:45:29 it's a little difficult for the TOs to pay into India, but they'll get it done 17:45:55 Ok, noted. 17:46:01 That's all from me. 17:46:23 #topic Content team 17:47:12 last time there was going to be a meeting to discuss specifics of the schedule 17:47:27 had a meeting to discuss the details 17:48:01 terceiro: would put up a skeletal schedule and scheduling will happen hopefully this week 17:49:49 ok, sounds like it's all in hand then 17:49:54 anything else we need on this? 17:50:18 nothing on schedule for the moment 17:50:51 #topic Video team 17:50:55 I have something to say about the music license, in context with the event proposed by Joenio. 17:51:17 #undo 17:51:17 Removing item from minutes: 17:51:41 According to the IPRS page, this event comes under the Live Music/DJ event. And as this is a sponsored event in a 5-star hotel, the license fee can be high up to 150K INR which is around 1800 USD for an event. 17:52:07 Which I think is not affordable to us for a single event. 17:52:23 I don't think we want to pay that, no 17:52:31 And our work around is to avoid hotel and give a slot in the other venue inside Infopark if that's available in schedule. 17:53:36 err, if the event is https://debconf23.debconf.org/talks/58-live-coding-for-art-sound-and-visuals/ 17:53:45 then surely there won't be any copyright protected content? 17:53:54 Algorave, yes. 17:53:59 there wont be.. but hotel will not allow 17:54:06 That's what Joenio said too. 17:54:07 <[pirate]praveen> the problem is to convince the hotel manager, how do he verify? 17:54:10 any kind of music without license 17:54:19 yeah then another venue sounds like a good fix for that 17:54:38 Yes, the hotel manager is not ready to accept the risk for getting a legal notice if someone reports a violation. 17:54:41 also it's nice for people to see a change of venue, especially if they've been in the hotel for the two weeks 17:54:44 [pirate]praveen: we can invite him to a talk about copyright :) 17:54:44 let's go with that then, there's no point arguing with someone if they say no absolutely 17:54:46 <[pirate]praveen> he had received some copyright notices in the past, so he wants to be safe 17:54:54 (hi there. sorry, I was busy) 17:54:54 yeah I understand that 17:55:13 <[pirate]praveen> we could, but expecting him to learn about copyright and decide may not be a realistic thing 17:55:25 #topic Video team 17:55:33 only item on this was local equipment hire 17:55:47 <[pirate]praveen> the other idea was to give a legally binding document that says he won't need to be pay anything 17:55:59 [pirate]praveen: yeah, that's an option, too 17:56:15 <[pirate]praveen> but infopark venue would be the easiest for now 17:56:32 we're going to be live streaming events on the internet. He should probably be more worried about that. But he gets to decide on what he's worried about 17:56:59 pwaring: vendors have been found for basically everything, I think 17:57:14 great 17:57:16 still tweaking some details, but equipment hire is looking good 17:57:19 so nothing to discuss :) 17:57:25 correct 17:57:34 #topic Progress on Haifa DebConf 17:57:39 tzafrir: do you want to say anything on this? 17:58:48 Still checking with the Technion CS faculty. 17:59:59 tumbleweed (IRC): this event err, if the event is https://debconf23.debconf.org/talks/58-live-coding-for-art-sound-and-visuals/ is not the Algorave 18:00:10 #topic Meeting schedule 18:00:20 next meeting will be 28th August, the last one before DebCamp 18:00:35 IIRC, we move to on-site meetings once the camp/conf starts 18:01:01 joeniocosta[m]: ah right, I remember you proposed it on IRC. But not on the site, yet 18:01:13 #topic AOB 18:01:24 anything else? 18:01:44 I would just like to let Joenio if he could run his activities or not 18:02:36 I think the team are looking at another venue to see if that's possible 18:02:44 Sorry to be late here, but I would like to say that I believe I'll not have time enough to organize an Algorave at this point, them maybe it is good to relax on this topic for now and postpone it to the future, I think it is the righ choise for now. 18:02:46 I don't think they can say yes/no now, unless I'm mistaken 18:03:23 how is everyone feeling? excited? nervous? 18:03:32 *right 18:03:42 highvoltage: both 18:04:21 srud: it will all work out :) 18:04:31 ok, thanks everyone for coming and see you next week! 18:04:33 #endmeeting