17:59:50 #startmeeting Debconf 22 Team meeting 17:59:50 Meeting started Mon Feb 21 17:59:50 2022 UTC. The chair is pwaring. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:59:50 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 17:59:57 #topic Roll call 18:00:07 as always, please introduce yourself if you're here (I'm Paul) 18:00:12 hello 18:00:36 ~ Hello ~ 18:00:37 Hi, I'm Era :) 18:02:08 Hello 18:02:11 hi 18:02:13 Hello :) 18:03:18 #topic In-person event planning: Tracks and talk types 18:03:35 At the last meeting we agreed to populate the track and talk types 18:04:14 I have copy pasted the ones from last year, and Terceiro has activated the page for submitting proposals, with those listes 18:04:17 listed* 18:04:47 great! 18:04:57 #info Track and talk types have been populated based on the previous year 18:05:26 #topic In-person event planning: Call for Papers 18:06:04 Is the proposals page ready? The website says it has not been opened 18:06:17 I have created a MR, with the CFP page on the website. 18:06:31 here 18:06:55 Once this is merged, we can send out the email to the announce mailing list 18:07:01 With that text 18:07:06 #info Merge request is pending for the CFP page 18:07:08 #link https://salsa.debian.org/debconf-team/public/websites/dc22/-/merge_requests/5/diffs 18:07:36 hopefully it will get merged soon :) 18:08:14 #topic In-person event planning: Important dates 18:08:16 Should I, or someone from the international content team send out the email 18:08:24 sorry pwaring (IRC) 18:08:41 I'm not sure what the process is for sending it out 18:08:46 does anyone know? 18:09:04 send to the various -announce lists 18:09:12 can anyone do that? 18:09:36 Only with a DD gpg signature 18:09:56 ok we need a volunteer 18:10:20 I can do it if I am around 18:10:32 but I am sure terceiro or tumbleweed would as well 18:10:45 just see whom you can catch at your convenience 18:10:46 great 18:10:55 thanks for volunteering 18:11:19 #action CFP to be sent to -announce once merge request reviewed 18:11:45 #link https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2021/05/msg00003.html 18:11:49 ^Same from last year 18:11:55 *Sample from... 18:12:14 for important dates, there is a skeleton list on the website, some of which are coming up soon 18:12:19 #link https://debconf22.debconf.org/schedule/important-dates/ 18:12:29 Regarding important dates. The open day is a bit confusing. I am not sure if it should be the 16th of July or 17th of July. 18:12:30 can we agree fixed dates for any of them now 18:12:34 I can send the cfp 18:13:45 I guess tumbleweed has perfectly put it on the list, so I agree on leaving it as it is, on 17th 18:13:51 EnkelenaH[m]: we typically put the "arrival day" in that list so more people are actually *there* on the 17th 18:14:15 otherwise a lot of people find out it actually takes the best part of a day to travel to places := 18:15:04 so arrival day should be 16th, opening day 17th 18:15:29 yes 18:15:30 DLange (IRC): if I understand you clearly 18:15:33 cool :) 18:16:09 the dates that are coming up that we need to specify are: Decision on having physical conf, CFP opening, Registration opening 18:16:37 probably in that order, as the decision might affect CFP + registration 18:17:25 on the content team room, we spoke about April 15 being the day for CFP to be closed 18:17:30 so consider that 18:18:23 ok, so that will be 'Last day for submitting a talk that will be considered for the official schedule.' 18:18:34 yep 18:18:35 (on the current list, we can of course change the descriptions) 18:19:21 if we work back from that, giving people a month to submit would mean CFP opening by 14 March 18:20:01 so we could do: March 7 - decision on physical conf (i.e. our next meeting in two weeks), March 14 - CFP open, registration open 18:20:29 do those sound like reasonable dates? 18:21:21 sounds good 18:21:30 +1 18:22:21 +1 18:24:14 #agreed Important dates: March 7: Decision on physical conference; March 14: CFP open, registration open; April 15: CFP closed 18:25:09 #topic Remote contingency planning: Feedback from others 18:25:34 At the last meeting we asked everyone to solicit feedback/input from anyone who had been involved in remote confs (inc. Debian ones) 18:25:57 does anyone have anything they would like to bring up on that? 18:29:18 Matrix solution for Fosdem was nice. I don't know if you would like to imitate them. 18:30:13 https://matrix.org/blog/2022/02/07/hosting-fosdem-2022-on-matrix 18:30:24 #link https://matrix.org/blog/2022/02/07/hosting-fosdem-2022-on-matrix 18:31:49 shall we discuss this in more detail at the next meeting, once we've taken the physical/remote decision? 18:32:30 yeah, and when the Video team have had a discussion, too 18:32:51 sounds good 18:33:01 #topic Meeting schedule 18:33:30 March 7 and then 21? 18:33:51 #info Next meetings will be Monday 7th March and Monday 21st March, 18:00 UTC 18:34:14 as we get nearer the time we might go to more frequent meetings, but I think we're still a way off that point 18:34:53 of course :) 18:35:11 #topic AOB 18:35:17 anything else that people want to discuss? 18:37:13 okay, thank you all for coming and see you in two weeks! 18:37:16 #endmeeting