21:01:00 #startmeeting then 21:01:00 Meeting started Mon Jan 7 21:01:00 2019 UTC. The chair is tumbleweed. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:01:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 21:01:10 #topic Roll Call 21:01:12 o/ 21:01:17 nattie says o/ 21:01:25 \o 21:01:33 hi 21:01:35 Hello, happy new year. I'm around but a bit multitasking 21:01:39 #link agenda https://deb.li/dc19meet 21:01:48 I'm in the middle of an iMac disassenbly at work, but I'm here! 21:01:50 what's on for dinner, larjona? 21:02:15 hello 21:02:38 hello 21:03:17 #topic Review #action's from previous meeting 21:04:19 * tumbleweed nattie to inquire of tumbleweed about wiki migration (nattie, 22:03:38) 21:04:25 we did it 21:04:35 well, DLange and I did, at CCC 21:04:54 waiting on DSA to host the fully-staticified site 21:05:01 hi 21:05:08 the old one is down, can i turn off? 21:05:20 or keep a while more? 21:05:26 not yet, as the DNS has not been moved over yet either 21:05:30 Ganneff: I don't think the old one is down, yet 21:05:33 ok 21:05:38 (ping me when it is, thanks) 21:05:44 will do 21:06:05 #topic Budget for DC19 21:06:31 Does anyone know the progress on this? 21:07:10 hi, it's almost done. 21:07:17 \o/ 21:07:31 just waiting catering to finish 21:07:42 can we have a draft to review then, please? 21:07:49 is it in git? 21:07:54 As i know... phls should say better 21:08:02 OK 21:08:19 probably is in git, i can't afirm. 21:08:50 anything else to discuss here, without phls? 21:09:36 guess not 21:09:40 #topic registration 21:09:54 (sorry, this meeting topic of "then" is annoying, but I can't see any way to change it) 21:10:07 is (our) wafer "ready" for registration opening or is there something bigger in progress (upstream for example)? 21:10:13 So, I was expecting that I'd do it over the holidays, and I didn't. Sorry 21:10:30 But re-using the same registration stuff for dc19 isn't a whole lot of work 21:10:34 probably get that done within a few days 21:10:47 nice 21:10:47 there are some thnigs that we're still waiting for, before we can open 21:10:53 like prices for food 21:11:24 and figuring out how we want to handle paid people in our block booking (for the cases where 1 half of a couple gets a bursary, and the other half is self-paying) 21:11:24 and we need an estimate for income as we won't know about travel funding options otherwise 21:11:31 yeah 21:11:41 certainly can't start any bursary processes without a budget 21:12:14 the other thing with a price is the registration fee. I assume we're using the same 0, 200, and 500 USD prices? 21:12:22 also, um, do we keep using paypal? 21:12:27 ooooh yes that 21:12:35 I really want to use stripe 21:12:39 or something 21:12:49 but that'll need some SPI action 21:12:52 Afaik spi has been working hard on their PayPal ledger integration 21:13:03 paypal worked well, not? (I know that all web devs like stripe more) 21:13:10 or did we have issues with PP? 21:13:11 paypal is not great for EU users 21:13:14 Waiting for stripe might cause long delays 21:13:16 DLange: paypal now requires an account for EU citizens 21:13:17 because you need to have a paypal account 21:13:34 aah, o.k. 21:13:35 there weren't any technical issues 21:13:36 pollo: sure. If we have to wait, let's not 21:13:44 but we should push them to do it 21:13:50 +1 21:14:03 there's never any motivation for action, except when we're trying to open registration 21:14:10 olasd: beside: i don't want to see any BRL fees. only USD this year. please! 21:14:55 zobel: sure 21:14:59 zobel: all the incoming payments should have been in USD last year, weren't they? 21:16:29 need to check 21:17:12 Dc17 was a currency snafu but that was my fault and I think we fixed that for dc18 21:18:10 OK 21:18:15 sorry 21:19:38 anything more to cover here? 21:19:56 I don't think so 21:20:05 #topic AOB 21:20:18 pollo, olasd, tumbleweed: yes, DC18 was in USD. 21:20:18 Shall we talk about the DC20 bids? 21:20:27 just checked the raw daa. 21:20:29 data 21:20:31 Maybe sponsors status? 21:20:45 should we stick these all into the agenda? :) 21:20:54 and really of to bed now 21:21:03 nn^2 zobel :) 21:21:07 added 21:21:14 #topic Sponsors Status 21:21:19 pollo? 21:21:39 I've done a bunch and so has phls, but I'm afraid it wont be enough 21:22:07 Someone else (preferably from the local team) needs to do international sponsors too 21:22:30 is the difficulty here in poking the sponsors or in getting replies? 21:22:39 the poking 21:22:39 Doing the work 21:22:44 lol 21:22:59 It's not hard, it's just kinda boring and takes time 21:23:08 I've committed an initial draft for blog post about DebConf19 and it's my plan to put some emphasis in the call of sponsors. 21:23:28 it would go to bits.d.o and micronews.d.o (and social networks) 21:24:03 any push helps 21:24:15 but we'd really need active local team members 21:24:17 pollo: thanks for documenting the process 21:24:30 we probably need to do some more recruiting, there 21:24:37 otherwise we'll (have to) cut the budget into what will be realistically achivable 21:24:55 * tumbleweed intends to try his hand at some. Got a few too many hats already though - me helping won't change a whole lot... 21:25:02 #link https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebConf/Sponsors 21:27:34 next? 21:28:03 (DC20 bids) 21:28:09 #topic DC20 Bids 21:28:21 #link https://wiki.debian.org/DebConf/20/ 21:28:34 I'm not aware of any activity in the Indian bid 21:28:43 but the Haifa and Lisbon bids are both active 21:29:05 nattie and I have just spent a couple of days with both of the bid teams 21:29:11 need to write a report on that... 21:29:33 shall we poke for India or let it go for next year (I'd lean towards Europe / Israel again more than Asia in 2020)? 21:30:14 We probably should have poked a month ago, to remind people that the bid deadline was 2018-12-31 21:30:24 I guess we didn't define exactly what we were expecting for then 21:30:27 i think india is not active... but i think a poke is good 21:30:57 we should probably start discussing the bids soon 21:31:07 so if they want to still be in the running, they'd have to get a lot of work done, FAST 21:31:29 which is unlikely as they did not agree on a location (city) 21:31:39 Is there a decision meeting date? 21:31:44 not yet 21:31:58 we said end of Jan / beg of Feb 21:32:15 what is your travel timing tumbleweed / nattie? 21:32:46 #link https://lists.debian.org/debconf-team/2018/10/msg00019.html 21:32:55 We will ask the teams that have updated their bid platforms to 21:32:55 participate in review meetings in January 2019 and announce the winner 21:32:55 for the DebConf20 bid in February 2019. 21:32:55 We plan to hold the review meetings in the week of 14-20 January 2019. 21:32:55 We'll put out a poll for dates and times, in early January, when we have 21:32:58 a final list of bids. 21:33:19 DLange: urgh. I'm just travelling all the time :( 21:33:26 nattie would prefer after FOSDEM 21:33:46 we should make sure to honor that and make sure you're not in a plane :) 21:33:47 I imagine the debconf video sprint before FOSDEM will be quite a debconf planning sprint, too 21:33:55 :P 21:34:08 Isn't it always? 21:34:33 heh 21:34:34 indeed 21:35:02 I don't fancy Fosdem but if you want to do something DebConf besides video, I could come around 21:35:27 We are sprinting 1 week before fosdem in bruxelles 21:35:38 The point I was making is that there will be a bunch of us talking debconf, around then 21:35:43 I know. But for video, I'm useless ;) 21:35:45 we could do this during that week 21:36:06 make an agenda and if you want / need me, I can be around 21:36:25 nattie suggests Thursday 31st 21:36:39 wfm 21:36:54 but that's before Fosdem 21:37:05 which means the review meetings would have to happen in the 14-20, as announced 21:37:27 should we put some doodles out? 21:37:46 which means we'd need to get your report rather soonish, too... 21:37:50 :P 21:38:26 no doodles, please ask the teams for a date when they would want to present and we'll make that 21:38:42 Lisboa / Haifa are all easy European TZ wise 21:38:51 I'll be in NZ :P 21:38:56 pff! 21:39:24 but yeah, wfm 21:39:51 DLange: will you take an action for that? 21:40:00 yep, can do 21:40:36 #action DLange to ask the bids to propose review meeting dates & times 21:41:03 AOB? 21:41:30 you haz new DebConf audio gear? 21:41:43 not that I know of 21:41:48 no, I need to handle that this week 21:42:01 okis 21:42:43 #topic AOB 21:42:48 last call for AOB 21:43:07 not for me 21:43:12 I would suggest having more frequent team meetings, soon 21:43:27 but this really needs the brazilian team here 21:43:50 ack 21:43:56 +1 21:44:12 If you (anybody) can send some paragraph for blog post or DPN explaining/summarising the debconf wiki migration, I appreciate it. I don't feel confident to write something myself (not sure about the details and future status) 21:44:13 ack. i think after feb, we should do more frequent. 21:44:27 If you plan to inform debconf-team mailing list (or whatever other mailing list) about that, it's also ok, we (publicity team) can micronews linking there or write a summary for the DPN ourselves when we read the mail. 21:44:50 lenharo: only *after* feb? 21:44:59 there's an event in feb, right? 21:45:05 larjona: yes, we'll should do that once the static site is up 21:45:07 yes. 21:45:21 I think we didn't talk about the Call for proposals? (Is it ready? somebody preparing?) 21:45:33 it's my sugestion... if you think thay they need to be early, no problem for me. 21:45:36 I can send you a paragraph "in preparation". Should be any time now DSA has spare cycles. 21:45:43 larjona: yeah, we should probably do that with registration 21:45:47 * tumbleweed wonders if we have a content team 21:46:00 gwolf: ^? 21:46:07 (courtesy hilight :)) 21:46:40 03:39 * gwolf won't make it to the meeting, no matter what - We are travelling tomorrow back to Mexico, leaving Argentina at the shitty time of 04:20 GMT-3. 21:46:48 I think he's flying from Argentine atm so feedback will be sometime after the meeting 21:47:13 OK, we can discuss that out of this meeting 21:47:55 ok, no problem. I'll word the blog post about encouraging people to make their plans about submitting proposals and registering, since it will be open "soon" ;-) 21:48:29 shouldn't we hold that back unt il it is open? 21:49:27 yes, no problem 21:49:35 #topic Next Meeting 21:49:49 Jan 21? 21:50:27 works for me. 21:50:38 +1 21:51:01 there should have been some dc20 bid review, before then 21:51:03 +1 21:51:43 endmeeting? 21:52:01 back to the regular meeting time? 21:52:04 yes, thanks for chairing! 21:52:41 #agreed next meeting on Jan 21 22:00 UTC 21:52:48 * tumbleweed waits for objection 21:53:01 no objection 21:53:14 in that case 21:53:19 it's too late anyways, doesn't matter how much :) 21:53:23 TZ suck 21:53:25 :) 21:53:29 #endmeeting