18:37:41 #startmeeting 18:37:41 Meeting started Wed Feb 10 18:37:41 2016 UTC. The chair is tumbleweed. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:37:41 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 18:37:50 sorry, running late this morning 18:38:02 agenda: http://deb.li/DCR16meet1 18:38:07 fine with me 18:38:09 err, feels like there should be more in there 18:38:15 tumbleweed: no problem 18:38:32 #topic wafer 18:38:42 procrastination is a killer 18:38:46 I'll get on this, promise 18:38:55 got some stuff done on the weekend, but nothing since 18:39:01 o/ 18:39:32 urgh, I'm not up to speed on the pre-reg form contents email thread 18:40:31 indiebio: thanks for prodding CMC 18:40:40 cool 18:42:04 #topic pre-reg form contents 18:42:06 now I'm caught up 18:42:21 not much in the way of a decision, though 18:42:33 I suspect we'll have to come back to it, when we have an example 18:42:41 but what is the plan for pre-reg, registration and cfp? 18:43:08 cate: the plan is to have them 18:43:11 are you asking about schedule? 18:43:24 tumbleweed: yes, schedule 18:43:39 ASAP pre-reg 18:44:02 as DLange pointed out, we need final accom numbers in april 18:44:12 so, registration has to be final before then 18:44:23 that means clearly *hurry* 18:44:27 Is pre-reg necessary for having sponsorship? 18:44:28 indeed 18:44:28 prereg must open 18:44:44 cate: I think so, yes 18:44:57 we don't need the fieldset to be final for prereg (although it helps not doing *too big* changes) 18:45:06 gwolf: quite 18:45:24 Note: we don't need pre-registration and registration in two phases. Sometime we had only one 18:45:25 but anyway, we don't aim for perfection (just for good enough ;-) ). Optimization is left as an excercise for the reader 18:45:33 gwolf: actually, I agree with the first half of your statement, but not the second half 18:45:45 I don't think the prereg questions have to look anything like reg questions 18:45:59 cate: very true 18:46:00 I think we just want it open soon it soon 18:46:10 cate: yeah, that's always been the fallback plan 18:46:15 tumbleweed: what do you expect to be the main differences? 18:46:19 gwolf: everything 18:46:23 I think the plan on titanpad is good. Just formulate in a better way and some additional help 18:46:30 gwolf: see what I've been saying in the e-mail thread 18:46:31 And we all can help 18:46:55 tumbleweed: sorry, I'm very backlogged on email. I'll look at that thread before entering noise into a conversation 18:47:40 gwolf: http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20160204.004904.299427f3.en.html 18:48:14 I think we should also contact bremner [I think he was ok with proposal, but the questions should make sense for them, to "classify" people] 18:48:20 umh, I see 18:48:31 Just he cannot be in a meeting at these times [working] 18:48:36 am unconvinced, but would have to look at the actual full mail 18:49:02 but anyway, the preregistration can then be just a simple, non-wafer microwebapp 18:49:11 would not gain us much, though 18:49:25 gwolf: yeah, it could. But I don't see that happening :) 18:49:29 :) 18:49:45 OK, let's move on 18:50:07 #topic RFP timing 18:50:13 I assume this is about food quotations? 18:50:18 (etc.) 18:50:27 It could also be mean CFP :P 18:51:42 this agenda item was added by "Anonymous user" so I don't know who I should be prodding 18:52:29 it doesn't seem that anyone has anything to say 18:52:36 content team 18:52:50 (of which I'm a very lateral part ;-) ) 18:52:53 what does RFP stand for. I understand call for papers 18:53:00 dumbassman: request for proposal 18:53:03 request or call, I'd say 18:53:08 dumbassman: yes, as I was saying, it's very unclear 18:53:11 request for packaging 18:53:14 :) 18:53:15 duh 18:53:28 nobody ever replies to RFPs :P 18:53:38 Oh. Please pack up your stuff >2hr before going to the airport to South Africa. 18:53:39 is wafer ready for CfP? 18:53:42 Next point? :) 18:53:56 cate: ↑↑ 18:53:57 cate: not quite, that was a parallel discussion on the list 18:54:28 pre-registration we've already covered 18:54:30 #topic food 18:54:34 indiebio: ? 18:54:46 huh? sorry, working 18:55:12 oh, we need to start working on food quotes. Can I assume we want to go with Claire's catering, the nicer option 18:55:26 and then UCT club can always be a fall back option 18:55:47 i want to know if I can contact her asking if she's still available for those dates, and start building the relationship. 18:56:02 I obviously can't do tha - create expectations - t if we're not going with her. 18:56:10 I have no objection to that, but I'd like to hear from someone with more debconf experience 18:56:36 are we likely to want to squeeze the food budget later? 18:57:02 I think catering is the best (with a backup option) as base. I assume a full quotation is possible through Claire with creating unnecessary expectation 18:57:17 withou* 18:57:18 from our last discussion we considered the budget reasonable. And I think good food is a have to have. 18:57:24 without* 18:57:53 'K, that's what I'm going to do then. 18:58:00 especially if the cheap one cannot afford to give all options (vegan / vegetarian) 18:58:32 cate: good point. Claire is well versed in diverse food options. UCT CLug's vegetarian will be monotonous, I think. 18:58:45 Clug = club 18:58:53 tumbleweed: we can always adjust budget. We don't have a clear path to do it, though 18:58:55 +1 to good food quality 18:59:04 'K, i think that's settled then. 18:59:16 +1 on goof foood indiebio 18:59:17 OK 18:59:25 good food 18:59:31 #topic anything else? 18:59:36 But as long as we present a decent plan to the DPL (or to our then-existing delegates), it's usually an important point to be able to pursue happiness through food :) 18:59:45 tamo_: yup. You can have an excellent conference, if the food is bad, that is the one thing people remember! 18:59:46 gwolf: :) 18:59:55 haha true 19:00:00 indiebio: true! 19:00:01 indiebio: YES. 19:00:34 oh, before we forget 19:00:35 #agreed assume we want to go with Claire's catering, 19:01:10 sorry, please beat me up about late pre-reg. I'll get a something up in the next couple of days :( 19:01:19 and then we can have useful discussion on it 19:01:44 if I may sidebar: can someone give me a short description of what is the plan with Debcamp. Just curios 19:01:50 tumbleweed: is it the background of teh registration using wafer taht is the discussion? 19:02:11 Or what questions you need to ask? 19:02:12 tamo_: the discussion is about details of reg. And yes, it happens in wafer 19:02:16 tumbleweed: do you need some help? 19:02:43 tumbleweed: ok 19:02:50 dumbassman: we've booked 100 places accommodation, venue is booked, so pitch up and code, pretty much 19:02:56 what else do you need to know? 19:03:01 what venue? 19:03:04 cate: good for now, I think. madduck and upstream wafer people have been helping, but I've taken this bit of it on my shoulders 19:03:12 indiebio: is accomodation booked? Brilliant 19:03:15 dumbassman: same as the main conference 19:03:30 tamo_: yes, we just need the darn invoicein the proper format. 19:03:42 yay! 19:03:43 indiebio: ah ok 19:03:47 dumbassman: if people want sponsorship to debcamp, they're usually required to provide a work plan, and (ideally) promise to post a report afterwards 19:03:50 Great! 19:04:21 thanks. bit clearer now 19:04:26 As we are in "anything else"... Has there been any movement on the visa requesting side? 19:04:36 (Should I hurry to get mine processed?) 19:05:05 (I know my country does require it) 19:05:12 gwolf: how much do you want to be a guinea pig for the team? :) 19:05:19 19:06:18 ginggs: do we have a visa team mailing list / email address yet? 19:06:35 neither 19:06:51 tumbleweed: what is the process if people want to give a workshop at debconf? 19:06:55 there's visa@debconf.org 19:07:00 tumbleweed: or debcamp 19:07:11 ginggs: I guess you need to talk to Ganneff about getting on visa@debconf.org 19:07:17 tumbleweed: do they need to register for it? 19:07:44 tamo_: they need to register to be at debconf. Then submit a talk proposal. They can't do either of these things, yet 19:08:03 ginggs: I read something that the Visa rules for Children have been lifted, is this true? 19:08:15 yes, it's got significantly better 19:08:34 tumbleweed: ok great thanks 19:08:37 Do you think I qualify as a child? ;-) 19:08:39 i heard rumours, and then denials 19:08:56 ginggs: So... Should I start prodding you privately while visa@ is set up? 19:09:16 gwolf: sure, you can be the guinea pig 19:09:49 great. I just got scared about the flight costs and stuff :-| But I think it's time for me to start moving WRT the visa 19:10:17 gwolf: not sure it could be debateable, given your mood at any given time :) 19:10:26 :) 19:11:29 Ganneff: please add ginggs@debian.org to visa@debconf.org 19:11:41 flights costs now are probably as good as they're going to be 19:12:17 and the peso-dollar exchange ratio is as screwed up as it has ever been :-| 19:12:28 same for rand-dollar :P 19:12:30 tumbleweed: they could get better depending on Winter now they are high becuase of the influx of tourist we are having 19:13:04 'anything else': I saw Table Mountain was a day-trip possibility. I would like to offer my help with that, I frequent table mountain weekly from Newlands forest and generally like hiking 19:13:52 dumbassman: excellent 19:13:54 dumbassman: I haven't seen you on here before, you obviously live in Cape Town? 19:14:01 I get the feeling this meeting is over :) 19:14:11 first timer, live in bellville 19:14:18 #endmeeting