19:12:23 #startmeeting 19:12:23 Meeting started Tue Jul 5 19:12:23 2011 UTC. The chair is nattie. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:12:23 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 19:12:26 \o/ 19:12:36 all hail The Nattie 19:12:41 we're sticking the final numbers bit on the end 19:12:42 ahoy matey 19:12:47 * aroundthfur bows 19:12:48 #topic day trip 19:12:55 rafting 19:12:58 what's wrong with that 19:13:14 i guess we *are* opening this can of worms now... 19:13:23 as I said 19:13:26 I don't know who put it in the meeting agenda 19:13:27 the agenda says "day trip coordinator, with help from Zoran at tourist office" 19:13:33 those who don't wanna go to rafting can watch us do rafting 19:13:38 drink, eat whatever they want 19:13:50 AbsintheSyringe: great, so next topic? 19:13:52 or go to monastary 19:13:53 AbsintheSyringe: it's not all about "want" -- not everyone *can* go rafting 19:14:10 AbsintheSyringe: maybe you should order it differently and finish the controversy? 19:14:13 ok 19:14:16 then like this 19:14:17 nattie: I don't see how useful progress is going to be made on finding a local coordinator during the meeting, unless someone volunteers immediately 19:14:18 those who don't want to go to monastery can go rafting ;-) 19:14:22 first group who doesn't wanna go rafting 19:14:28 and yes, as was described long ago, rafting is a secondary activity 19:14:31 goes to the monastery 19:14:38 then we all meet up at the rafting 19:14:41 adnan just needs to learn to follow the form of words he agreed a long time ago :) 19:14:43 we'll end rafting by then 19:14:46 and we'll all meet up at the 19:14:53 moray, rafting thing we were at 19:14:57 what's wrong with that? 19:15:08 and third option is...? ;) 19:15:08 AbsintheSyringe: nothing is wrong besides saying "the day trip is rafting" 19:15:12 how far apart are the rafting venue and the monarstery, anyway? 19:15:19 moray, didn't say that 19:15:21 *monastery 19:15:26 um, yes you did, actually 19:15:37 nattie, I think by the time they are done with that we'll be done rafting 19:15:38 nattie: i liked "monarsetery" 19:15:46 and end at the finishing point with rafting 19:15:49 then 19:15:51 19:52:02 as AbsintheSyringe seemed to agree before, rafting should be an extra event at a different time 19:15:52 we'll all meet 19:15:57 enjoy drinks and food 19:15:58 is the daytrip (monastery) wheelchair-safe? 19:16:05 zobel, yep 19:16:18 just asking. 19:16:19 rafting is obviously not 19:16:31 so that's why we have more options for one occasion 19:16:32 19:53:44 AbsintheSyringe: after or during day is fine, but it shouldn't be advertised as the main event, and shouldn't be advertised as an "option" even 19:16:35 I think that should work 19:16:44 tiago, I think 19:16:53 rafting should be chosen as an "option" 19:17:05 as mainly we'll go to monastery 19:17:08 i think the thing is that the monastery should be proposed as the main trip, and the rafting as an alternative 19:17:09 those who don't want to go 19:17:14 we'll meet up at rafting end point 19:17:20 meanwhile rafting people will end their rafting 19:17:26 nattie, i agree on that 19:17:27 and we'll all meet for food and drinks 19:17:29 sounds good to me 19:17:36 good, i'm just rememebering what we have agreed before, it doesn't really matter to me what goes from now 19:17:38 that's what I'm saying 19:17:41 everyone good on that one? 19:17:47 mhm 19:17:50 that is what AbsintheSyringe is saying, he just has harsh words sometimes.. 19:17:57 AbsintheSyringe: Yes, but we should advertise the main activity as a trip to a nice monasterium 19:17:58 aroundthfur, tnx :) 19:18:06 gwolf, sure 19:18:09 and while we are there, some people might be interested in a side activity 19:18:09 no problem with that 19:18:12 which happens to be rafting 19:18:19 I understand your enthusiasm 19:18:20 #agreed Main daytrip will be to the monastery, rafting will be proposed as an alternative to the main trip 19:18:21 exactly 19:18:26 that's what I've been saying this whole time 19:18:34 however when I say something you understand it as "we gonna do that" 19:18:35 :D 19:18:36 AbsintheSyringe: (not quite... Wording matters. A lot!) 19:18:41 nattie: monastery plus walk to old ruined town I think 19:18:42 I'm giving out options 19:18:43 come on :) 19:18:46 do we have a coordinator? 19:18:47 nattie: like I said on the list a while ago 19:18:51 moray: short form... 19:18:54 nattie, no, as he's not here 19:19:02 tourist board will have to do it 19:19:28 who is the person who would do it otherwise? 19:19:29 well, we should find a coordinator, but we can start on the details anyway 19:19:36 nattie, i can do it, if no one else will 19:19:45 aroundthfur: you're doing quite a lot already 19:19:52 best if it's someone who speaks the local language as 'coordinator' 19:19:57 sure 19:20:00 I'm happy to (help) sort out what happens though 19:20:02 i know, but if no one will do this it might as well be me :D 19:20:03 I was thinking to set DIVA as coordinator between those two 19:20:05 but i'll keep you in the back of my head (with all the other strange things rattling around there) 19:20:10 aroundthfur, you can't do it, you don't have time 19:20:34 anyone else from localteam? 19:20:35 AbsintheSyringe: you mean as coordinator between us and the tourist board? 19:20:42 nattie: yes 19:20:49 nattie: but a local team person is better I think 19:20:58 moray, i agree 19:21:03 nattie: I still expect we can get someone, their exams should be finishing now 19:21:34 I guess I could take this as my topic, and I will try harder to find a local team person/people? 19:21:34 nattie, yes 19:21:35 shall we agree that a coordinator will be drafted soon and filled in asap? 19:21:38 as I have been pushing it already 19:21:42 Zlatan said he would do it 19:21:48 moray, let me find someone who will "willingly" do it 19:21:55 put as it this 19:22:02 we would set DIVA to this 19:22:04 shall we just draft Zlatan? 19:22:06 otherwise we'll get someone to do this 19:22:08 nattie, NO 19:22:29 nattie, srsly no, he said he would do it and then even show up for meeting 19:22:32 negative points 19:22:33 nattie: info: Zlatan or AbsintheSyringe will find someone 19:22:33 no way 19:22:34 aroundthfur: well, that would count under me "trying harder", if you find someone 19:22:44 tiago, no, rm -rf Zlatan from there 19:22:52 moray, :) 19:22:57 aroundthfur: but I could also start contacting the tourist board guy directly, with what I proposed on the list 19:23:11 . 19:23:14 whatever, I'll take care of it 19:23:15 moray, yes, if you need help i am your guy 19:23:19 hahahah 19:23:24 so everyone will take care of it.. 19:23:25 sweet 19:23:29 moray: that sounds like a good initial plan, as the tourist board guy would be knowledgeable 19:23:32 um 19:23:33 AbsintheSyringe: *you* really have too many topics :) 19:23:43 moray, I do, but I have good contacts 19:23:44 let's settle on moray contacting the tourist board guy, initially 19:23:55 AbsintheSyringe is true superman ;) 19:23:58 AbsintheSyringe: right, but let's say I'll coordinate for now, including with you 19:23:59 igustin, there you go, tnx :) 19:24:05 and then we can find someone on localteam to take over coordination once they've been found 19:24:06 AbsintheSyringe: that saves you having it on your to-do list actively 19:24:12 * aroundthfur agrees with moray 19:24:18 #action moray to contact Zoran from the tourist board initially 19:24:27 moray, no you'll coordinate group that's going to monastery aroundthfur will coordinate the group going to rafting 19:24:30 how about that? 19:24:34 all with help of Zoran 19:24:47 topic finished, let's move on 19:24:54 yeah.. 19:24:59 local team report? 19:25:04 AbsintheSyringe: Pressure is high. But please drop that way of speaking 19:25:07 AbsintheSyringe: you're not chairing this meeting 19:25:10 it leads to no agreement. 19:25:15 wtf 19:25:19 you cannot decide on behalf of everybody. 19:25:28 gwolf++ 19:25:43 but, I think we *are* done on that topic for now anyway 19:25:58 yes, i'm just drafting an agreed for the minutes 19:26:15 btw, I'm sitting next to aroundthfur he can confirm my voice is safe and sound :) 19:26:26 #agreed moray to coordinate monastery group, aroundthfur to coordinate rafting group, with assistance from tourist board 19:26:31 #topic local team report 19:26:37 ok 19:26:38 aaaaaaaand localteam 19:26:41 so the only thing 19:26:42 we would need from you 19:26:47 because we are under a lot of pressure 19:26:52 from govt + everybody else 19:26:56 we need final numbers 19:26:59 that's all we need really 19:27:00 yeah 19:27:03 so please 19:27:06 minister called today 19:27:10 asking for these 19:27:17 so ... 19:27:21 please let's have these tonight 19:27:22 yeah, we really need those! 19:27:27 we will 19:27:29 they told me to even call them after meeting 19:27:32 AbsintheSyringe: we kind of have them, the big blocker now is that no one had actually closed penta -- hopefully that happened today though (???) 19:27:34 even tho it'll be 10/11PM 19:27:55 define "closed penta"? 19:28:00 moray: that will happen today 19:28:01 moray, darst said he did 19:28:09 darst has been revising numbers, but was called away 19:28:14 Ganneff: darst sent me a request for validation so no changes in some kind of way are allowed 19:28:19 Ganneff: done the end-of-reconfirmation stuff so that numbers are locked down 19:28:23 I have not been able to check it, but will do it today 19:28:32 aha 19:28:32 so we have something fairly close to final numbers, but will have them after his return 19:28:33 Ganneff: obviously people can confirm later, but then they're on their own for arrangements 19:28:44 (we dont want to forbid reconfirm, its just for sponsored) 19:28:47 right. fine. 19:28:56 listen, having at least approximate numbers and everything is good 19:29:01 and we need to forcibly convert "please select one" to basic, etc. 19:29:01 (btw, did the travel money already got on? im kind of late, sorry) 19:29:02 for them *we don't have anything* 19:29:09 Ganneff: shortly 19:29:12 change +/-10 is ok 19:29:15 nattie: great, thanks 19:29:35 ok, so that wasn't really a localteam report 19:29:42 #info localteam very strongly requests final numbers 19:29:52 YES! 19:29:53 and yes, we will oblige ASAP 19:29:56 it is a report, things we are having probelms with 19:29:57 AbsintheSyringe: are you in Banja Luka yet? 19:30:07 moray, no I'm in Tuzla sitting next to aroundthfur 19:30:12 moray, going there next week 19:30:17 AbsintheSyringe: yes, thought so, my question was really when :) 19:30:29 moray, whenever you want? 19:30:32 tell me when I have to be there 19:30:35 and I'll be there 19:30:38 I was planning 13th 19:30:40 but if that's too late 19:30:43 ... just tell me 19:30:44 srsly 19:30:53 it really is like that 19:30:57 AbsintheSyringe: for purposes of penta, should we put you as 16-31? 19:31:00 AbsintheSyringe: there is no standard rule, but I'm sure you'll find useful stuff whenever you get there 19:31:01 you want me to be there on 11th? 19:31:21 nattie, put in 13th 19:31:28 let's make it official 19:31:31 I'll be there on 13th 19:31:32 ok? 19:31:35 this is purely for purposes of penta 19:31:38 moray, ^ 19:31:49 AbsintheSyringe: 13th would be great, I'm sure, if you can schedule that 19:31:53 by all means, be there from the 13th, but this is for a different purpose 19:31:54 nattie, right I sent that info to richard 19:31:59 i know 19:32:00 moray, scheduled :) 19:32:03 from what i see, Phil Hands arrives at 13th. 19:32:04 that's it 19:32:10 zobel, I'll pick him up 19:32:12 I arrive 16th 19:32:21 moray, banja luka or zagreb? 19:32:24 so maybe around that time would be a good idea 19:32:24 Zagreb 19:32:31 and Banja Luka same day 19:32:34 (but via bus) 19:32:50 moray, AbsintheSyringe: h01ger and me will arrive 17th evening at banja luka airport 19:32:59 zobel, I'll pick you up 19:33:12 zobel, h01ger has my phone no just remind me a day before 19:33:15 we're arriving on the 17th around 5pm in Zagreb 19:33:20 nattie: are we still keeping penta for official dates? I think I put 17th there as earliest allowed 19:33:25 great 19:33:27 nattie: but I'm really 16th 19:33:30 any idea on shuttles yet? 19:33:37 moray, sorry Zagreb is too late for me you'll have to do shuttle/bus 19:33:40 * gwolf hates airlines :( 19:33:47 AbsintheSyringe: for purposes of penta i'll put you as the 17th, and stick in a note that you're arriving on the 13th 19:33:58 as I said I'll pick up Jimmy as well 19:34:08 FYI I'm a menace on the road :P 19:34:21 see how many days of DebConf you can keep your licence 19:34:23 nattie, sounds good, tnx 19:34:32 moray, it was taken away today 19:34:33 :D 19:34:36 but ... fsck it :D 19:34:37 i'll bring stuff up under AOB 19:34:47 #topic travel money 19:34:53 um ... 19:34:54 Ganneff: speak 19:35:03 thats from me: do we have more money? to pay all in queue "b" i need 5601 19:35:04 AbsintheSyringe: we can bring other stuff up under AOB - shan't be long 19:35:15 to fixup errors people mentioned to me, its a total of 5801 eur 19:35:20 nattie, sure, no worries 19:35:33 so its a question for the beancounters if we can afford that 19:35:41 for many people it gets slightly urgent now to know it 19:35:45 also, while at it: 19:35:59 what do we do with those that didnt reconfirm cos they have no travel money assigned yet? 19:36:02 late reconfirm allow? 19:36:16 it are 10 people 19:36:17 best would be to make a 'final' decision now 19:36:22 is this for sponsored or non? 19:36:26 thats sponsored 19:36:27 where 'final' is "unless we win the lottery" 19:36:40 we can do two things, i think: 19:36:45 * nattie imagines debconf faithfully filling in a lottery slip each week 19:36:46 then we could remove the uncertainty -- either we're happy to give it *now* or not 19:36:48 have the money and tell all of em its fine (and allow reconfirm) 19:36:57 or we can kick all out, as we dont have it 19:37:02 darst: how is money? 19:37:07 Ganneff: yeah 19:37:18 hi 19:37:22 just got back 19:37:26 \o/ 19:37:35 money is as in my last email 19:37:47 darst: is giving more travel money obviously-ok, obviously-stupid, or Further Discussion? 19:37:54 €54k of spending power now 19:38:05 5800 eur is maximum there, jftr 19:38:08 €16k to €21k surplus now (excluding local money). 19:38:43 16k projected surplus is not huge -- at almost every other DebConf there have been unexpected late costs 19:38:50 yeah 19:39:01 darst: still some unclear stuff re money needed for transportation from paris to Banja Luka 19:39:02 so would be "ok" to do it but I wouldn't push it 19:39:17 its either "ok" or "not ok", we dont have much more... 19:39:27 zobel: is the €3k quote each way still the best one, or more than that ? 19:39:58 Ganneff: will you be very upset if the answer is "not ok"? I agree it's better just to say "no" now than keep uncertainty longer, due to this year's setup 19:40:01 (and honestly, i would expect about a 1k eur or so in cancels, due to the late time, but i wont promise that) 19:40:12 darst: zack has the latest numbers. dunno 19:40:16 moray: no, i will be upset only if the answer is "we are unable to decide" 19:40:33 moray: leaving all of them up in the fog more. a clear ok or "sod off" is much better NOW 19:40:49 can someone remind me how much travel money we already gave out? -- and for interest how much debconf newbies gave? 19:40:50 (as bad as a not ok is, but its something) 19:40:51 zobel: right now €6k EUR total is budget for that shipping, and it sounds like it'll be less than that 19:40:52 darst: i still try to persue him to drive by car, that would be in total maybe 2k? 19:41:02 36.767,50EUR 19:41:03 darst: yes. 19:41:08 zobel: so it sounds like it might go down, not up 19:41:27 darst: h01ger and zack know. but they have dinner probably 19:41:30 darst: but from previous form we are still (sadly) likely to think of another expensive item we didn't expect 19:41:33 h01ger: ^ 19:41:48 and debconf newbies is at 2.8k eur 19:41:53 what about a "no" with a minor chance to have some reibursements after with no promises? 19:42:01 tiago: that's a bit too vague 19:42:06 darst: based on that, my feeling is "not ok" to give out more, and better to just say no therefore 19:42:10 we have already given a good amount 19:42:12 * darst would basically say "no" 19:42:33 let's agree that we do not give more travel sponsorship at this point 19:42:36 tiago: it is always "minor chance for more", but writing things that way to end-users isn't helpful 19:42:39 we would like a nice surplus for next year, since this is supposed to be "cheap" 19:42:44 darst: that's also true, yes 19:42:45 moray: agreed, yes 19:42:50 and next year is Far Away 19:42:55 so, with reluctance, no? 19:42:58 ok. fine. a nok then 19:43:05 #agreed No further travel sponsorship will be given 19:43:08 ill send out the bad mails then 19:43:13 €10k is the smallest surplus I would want in a normal year 19:43:14 sadly 19:43:14 Ganneff: thanks again for working on this 19:43:29 #topic AOB 19:43:35 ok 19:43:41 (since we already agreed final numbers will be given ASAP) 19:43:48 I was just wondering what are the other things that Debian will be giving money out to 19:44:02 um, actually i have a further item 19:44:05 t-shirts? 19:44:10 for example pro/corp attendees what's happening with that one 19:44:13 nattie: Debian Day: registration needed or not? 19:44:16 nattie, we are working on it 19:44:17 not to seem like a bit of a nag about this, but vanja is clearly MIA 19:44:20 aroundthfur: ok 19:44:22 nattie, I'll take care of that once i"m in Banja Luka 19:44:23 next week 19:44:54 ISTR in previous years we had some very simplified registration for Debian Day, but i only know of this in passing 19:44:59 do we have an emergency contact re: tshirts? 19:45:12 gwolf, yes 19:45:21 AbsintheSyringe, has a contact for that 19:45:28 re: DebianDay, I'd expect that, if the president is there, we will need to ensure some basic conditions on security/access control? 19:45:31 nattie: we have sometimes, yes, and originally this year wanted that, then said that they didn't 19:45:34 nattie: the question i understood: do we need it? 19:45:35 please don't we'll take care of that next week 19:45:38 besides final numbers 19:45:43 re president present and so on... 19:45:43 darst, final numbers? 19:45:51 we need to know 19:46:00 pro/corp is that money going to hotels? 19:46:03 or ...? 19:46:07 as it's not fair 19:46:09 gwolf, we can just ask people to sign at the entrance.. 19:46:10 can you reserve every room we have booked ? 19:46:11 generally speaking 19:46:24 for govt. to give us free accommodation and us to earn money on that 19:46:52 original plan was to 19:47:03 for them to pay directly to hotels 19:47:07 that plan changed 19:47:12 but still that's my opinion 19:47:25 we should pay hotels fee for those attendees directly 19:47:25 AbsintheSyringe: then you told us they couldn't pay the hotels, and that the government just paid it all 19:47:40 I guess darst's budget is based on having that money now 19:47:44 moray, I did, it was feasible but it was fairly complicated 19:47:51 that was our desire, you told us it couldn't happen, so we did not plan to do that 19:47:56 this is all stuff from months ago 19:48:17 If we don't need to register people for DebianDay, we can even not sign people at the entrance 19:48:20 AbsintheSyringe: technically they pay a registration fee, not for accommodation 19:48:27 moray, which is what? 19:48:38 AbsintheSyringe: the 450/1000 is a registration fee 19:48:48 moray, ok ... 19:49:06 still is any of the money we gonna generate from pro/corp gonna pay hotel fees or not 19:49:09 gwolf, i agree..a mail to debianday@ or a signature at the entrance is the same.. 19:49:18 as govt. was asking questions 19:49:23 AbsintheSyringe: we *did* originally suggest to use part of that for hotels, but for some months we had instead been planning on using that money elsewhere 19:49:26 the last thing they wanna is 19:49:37 but if we want to have a number of ppl that came to dday then i guess it's easier this way (more accurate number) 19:49:40 US getting money they are giving out for *free* 19:49:49 moray, I know I remember 19:49:53 I'm updating what's happening now 19:50:02 their argument is absolutely valid 19:50:26 I mean think about it 19:50:33 but i think pre-registering is sensible 19:50:41 in the end I would be the one who would suffer for this and I don't want that 19:51:07 they are not paying for accom, since they could have gotten that for free, they are paying to help make DebConf succeed long-term 19:51:08 nattie, pre-registration? I'm trying to talk final numbers right now :-/ 19:51:15 AbsintheSyringe: but you should have told the govt immediately that they were not paying "for accommodation" 19:51:23 AbsintheSyringe: for debian day - a mail would suffice 19:51:32 moray, someone has to pay for it 19:51:37 AbsintheSyringe: they pay a registration fee, and get free accommodation -- like all the people who ask for the registration to be sponsored/waived 19:51:40 the thing I'm trying to explain here is following 19:51:48 and if it wasn't going to help debconf, they wouldn't pay the _registration_ fee to debconf, most likely 19:52:06 moray: I agree that our logic is somewhat twiested 19:52:17 *they* (govt) is paying for hotels for *free* (sorry but nothing in this world is free) now if we're taking that money to debian funds we are making money of what they are originally paying for 19:52:24 that's what I'm trying to explain 19:52:26 gwolf: I was originally loudly in favour of just telling people to book accomm directly 19:52:41 gwolf: but now we're 10 days before the conference 19:52:52 moray: yes, but we are past that stage now... and there was lack of clarity at many points 19:52:57 which seems to be exploding now 19:53:25 so, I guess *this* might be the "big unexpected cost" I mentioned earlire 19:53:26 FWIW we can still (if needed) refund the money to professional/corporate and tell them "it's all sponsored" 19:53:31 but that'd be not desirable 19:53:48 gwolf: I suspect that would just make things worse, if adnan has already given non-optimal replies on this topic 19:54:05 gwolf: then it looks like we were trying to cheat them and have been caught! 19:54:06 moray, non-optimal meaning what? 19:54:13 heh, we can say "your fee is not benefiting DebConf, would you like a refund?" 19:54:20 the least I want in this whole topic is ambiguity 19:55:25 AbsintheSyringe: these fees were originally invented in previous years so that people could help fund DebConf 19:55:26 darst, they are giving something away for free 19:55:31 we are making profit from it 19:55:48 they did tell us to give money but trust me we can't trick the govt. 19:55:49 AbsintheSyringe: yes, and that's something we had agreed from the beginning 19:55:55 *are* we making profit from it? 19:55:58 moray, listen it's fine 19:56:01 moray, but aren't they helping if they are paying for they accom? 19:56:01 AbsintheSyringe: because the people that are paying for this are doing so to support Debian 19:56:02 it's not a problem 19:56:09 as long as we know the final numbers 19:56:28 gwolf, corporate? or generally 19:56:30 AbsintheSyringe: in no moment we are trying to cheat the government and get out of Bosnia rich 19:56:45 gwolf, no one is saying that 19:56:48 gwolf, no matter what you're trying to do, I don't wanna end up as scape goat 19:56:51 if gwolf/darst can, we should try to get the final numbers as soon as possible after this meeting is done 19:57:02 * gwolf is trying hard to arrive to bosnia non-poor... :( 19:57:16 moray: I'll do it today 19:57:19 but not right away 19:57:42 time out? break? 19:57:43 aroundthfur: but doesn't make any difference for DC budget, that's the thing darst suggested to explain to corporate atendees 19:57:46 we have a problem here 19:57:50 AbsintheSyringe: I agree with your motivation 19:57:53 and cannot blame you 19:58:02 but... is there any pressure on you coming from this? 19:58:02 gwolf, thank you 19:58:11 I'm not trying to harm any of the parties 19:58:16 I mean... Everything can be interpreted many ways 19:58:29 I just don't want to be taken blame on anything tomorrow 19:58:35 if i remember correctly we agreed, that we will reserve the hotels for everyone 19:58:47 we still charge pro/corp fees for people that don't use debconf accommodation, don't we? 19:58:50 but if there has been any real pressure on anything on this topic, we should clearly work on it 19:58:51 and then the corporate/prof. reg will give us money for it 19:59:00 but if not, well, we're staying where we promised from the beginning 19:59:01 Clint: yes, the accomm is optional 19:59:02 and we would pay the hotels after.. 19:59:11 moray: so then how is it paying for accommodation? 19:59:13 AbsintheSyringe: you can say that the prof/corp people are paying for the sponsored people's tickets 19:59:21 Clint: tell AbsintheSyringe this, not me 19:59:31 Clint: to me it's clearly a registration fee 19:59:42 and sponsorship waives the fee 20:00:03 I told you what the problem is 20:00:18 govt is giving it to us, they are not giving they are paying for it, we are making money from it 20:00:27 from what they are giving out for free 20:00:42 we are not making money from it 20:00:44 AbsintheSyringe: we are not "making money" 20:00:50 we use that money for Debconf 20:00:54 we make money from copr/prof ateendees who wants to help 20:00:55 15:59 < Clint> we still charge pro/corp fees for people that don't use debconf accommodation, don't we? 20:01:02 yes, and that has been normal in past years 20:01:13 can someone tell if the "sponsored" people in here: http://rkd.zgib.net/http/debconf/registration-data.txt are also the ones in the prof./corporate cathegory? 20:01:16 darst, ` 20:01:17 ?? 20:01:30 AbsintheSyringe: if the govt wants us to show we are not making money from it, we can show tens of reimbursements of flight travel 20:01:44 we are not going out of Bosnia with a govt-provided surplus 20:01:56 and yes, we will have more money - because we got sponsors giving it! 20:02:21 yes, let's not make additional surplus only because they are giving us all of this! 20:02:29 that's all I'm sayying 20:02:40 all the money we got, what's gonna happen to it? 20:02:40 we have no intention of doing so 20:02:42 after dc11? 20:02:46 besides 20:02:53 travel govt is taking care of it all 20:03:00 what else are we going to cover 20:03:01 aroundthfur, you probably want to look at only reconfirmed here: http://rkd.zgib.net/http/debconf/only-reconfirmed/registration-data.txt - and "sponsored" excludes "prof/corp" people 20:03:06 nothing basically 20:03:06 surplus is something normal in events 20:03:22 darst, well if it excludes the prof/corp 20:03:31 tiago, yes, unless you're going against this years conf in order to generate it for next year or whatever 20:03:47 ok 20:03:48 how are they not paying for they accom. ? 20:03:51 besides all of this 20:04:02 we're obviously got stuck in a rut 20:04:05 i guess i missunderstood this REALLY bad! 20:04:06 do we have final numbers? 20:04:22 we will have final numbers ASAP after the meeting 20:04:31 as i think i've mentioned a few times before 20:04:35 AbsintheSyringe: you know we don't have final numbers 20:04:41 this has been mentioned weeks ago 20:04:46 still no sign of final numbers 20:04:47 and, again - Are you getting any kind of pressure? 20:04:50 aroundthfur, accom is a different question, everyone can choose "yes accom" or "no accom" whether S/P/C, look at "Accommodation" for accom requests 20:04:55 or is this just the fear of getting the pressure? 20:04:56 gwolf, did you say we gonna have them on this date 20:05:10 we said we would have final numbers on 3 July 20:05:11 AbsintheSyringe: well, I have been requested today to make some modifications in penta 20:05:14 so the issue seems the localteam people misunderstood the meaning of fee registration, which could be friendly reverted 20:05:14 I will do it today 20:05:23 darst, but if they get free accom. from us, aren't they in the sponsored category too? 20:05:23 but not right away, as I simply cannot 20:05:26 i'm not blaming 20:05:35 would you be happy if we refunded all the pro/corp accommodation fees but charged those people the pro/corp attendance fees? 20:05:44 not wanting to go against this year's conf 20:05:44 but will have it in (my view of) today - Probably during your definition of tonight 20:05:56 we calculated everyone in the sponsored category, i thought those are the ppl we are sponsoring 20:06:07 I'm gonna take a break let's all think about what has been said here without any tensions or anything 20:06:10 we're all on the same side 20:06:11 gwolf: it's really Bosnian days that are relevant now 20:06:12 so ... please 20:06:16 for final numbers, I was working on it before I got dispatched to take someone to the hospital (twice) 20:06:21 moray: yes, but I'm still in UTC-5 20:06:28 and I am trying to get a way to get out of here 20:06:45 almost all the people are un-accom'ed if they haven't given the relevant information 20:06:45 * karora expects to travel from Zagreb to Banja Luka on 16th also 20:06:50 so yes, we are very close to having final numbers 20:07:05 and the quicker we close this meeting, the quicker we can get to having them 20:07:19 gwolf: right, but for AbsintheSyringe: we will have the numbers for his "tomorrow morning" I guess? 20:07:28 but not for his "tonight" it seems 20:07:44 can we give him rough numbers now, as he asked 20:07:55 and the accurate ones ready for his "tomorrow morning"? 20:07:58 moray: right 20:08:09 does the perso need number of people or what rooms we will reserve ? 20:08:10 darst: do you have rough numbers he can quote? 20:08:15 give number of people now 20:08:19 I assume? 20:08:20 AbsintheSyringe: ? 20:08:32 AbsintheSyringe: if you want rough numbers (like you said you did), do you want rooms or people? 20:09:13 roughly 250 people for accom 20:09:28 you could say that is a final number 20:09:37 and then say "there is always changes after the final number" 20:10:08 darst: I'm not sure saying that immediately to them will be reassuring :) 20:10:13 moray: if it's really cheaper to have one person in a twin room, then we should say to book all rooms since that is cheapest 20:10:23 (the second part wouldn't be said immediately...) 20:10:46 are we still finding out about tag-along people? 20:10:47 for example, we told CU housing "final numbers/dates", but they still took changes after that despite saying they wouldn't 20:11:00 nattie: "tag-along people"? 20:11:03 nattie: that would also be important to know @ 20:11:21 moray: accompanying people who are sharing primary attendees' rooms 20:11:31 nattie: but they're registered, rigth? 20:11:48 nattie: so "finding out" means what? 20:11:55 they are registered, but some of them are registered as basic 20:12:02 moray: we have had questions about cost structure of rooms 20:12:27 like someone's significant other wants to come and just stay in their partner's (single) room 20:12:37 we haven't been able to contact hotel or anyone to ask about this 20:12:44 darst: thank you for phrasing it more clearly than i managed 20:12:51 darst: if they're not registered, please tell them they should be 20:13:10 darst: but if they are: normally hotels are quite unhappy about unofficial guests 20:13:15 moray: they are registered (in the case i'm thinking of) but not sponsored or prof 20:13:16 they are registered as "basic" + "without accom" 20:13:19 darst: if they are not registered they must pay 20:13:19 darst: and AIUI we are now paying per person 20:13:40 darst: so it seems to me that extra people in rooms is, from an official perspective, completely out 20:13:43 and that's been always the understanding 20:13:51 IMO 20:13:58 at CU that was the case, yes 20:14:01 gwolf: indeed, I'm susprised to hear this raised now 20:14:22 nattie: did you tell anyone that would be OK? I always said "we need to check" 20:14:31 darst: and everywhere we have worked so far 20:14:34 do you have concrete cases? 20:14:35 but we never can communicate with anyone to ask about 20:14:41 number of cases +- ? 20:14:45 darst: nope, i said i would find out what the situation was 20:14:47 there is only one concrete case I know of 20:14:52 darst: two 20:14:53 Sledge 20:15:07 ok, two, nattie knows better I think 20:15:12 is the second one the kids ? 20:15:16 and Colin Watson's family (who are willing to pay but need to know how much) 20:15:34 darst: no, not the kids who are registered - that entire family is arranging their own accommodation, i think 20:15:42 ok 20:15:51 right, it's really much easier if people in odd situations arrange it themselves 20:16:04 but Colin's family are basically not attending the conference but willing to pay for accomm 20:16:08 as I said a while ago, we make really bad travel agents 20:16:13 (or getting it paid anyway) 20:16:18 Sledge's couple is registered in penta as "Will pay myself" 20:16:34 whoops, there goes bosnia... 20:16:34 FWIW, my girlfriend is also coming - but she is a volunteer. 20:16:45 gwolf: already registered so not a problem 20:16:56 nattie: so is Jo 20:17:30 I think the question here is whether people are registered but hoping to sneak into someone else's room 20:17:33 i read Sledge's mail somewhat differently i think 20:17:35 we have had problems with this in the past 20:17:42 no, that's not what i'm addressing 20:18:04 hello again 20:18:15 sorry, it seems we have network problems 20:18:18 nattie: https://penta.debconf.org/penta/pentabarf/person/1475 20:18:38 AbsintheSyringe: did you work out whether you want person numbers or room numbers today? then we give accurate person numbers ready for tomorrow morning 20:18:41 oh, "no accomodation provided" :-/ 20:18:44 darst, we need the number of ppl attending the conf 20:18:45 the rooms we need to reserve for them 20:18:45 so to rephrase: number of rooms to be reserved by us 20:18:45 i am guessing it's sponsored + prof/corp. from here: http://rkd.zgib.net/http/debconf/registration-data.txt ?? 20:18:45 so can we have an estimate now, or should we wait until tomorrow morning? 20:18:52 moray, no 20:18:57 I'm asking you again 20:19:04 we need final numbers 20:19:11 after that we'll take care of the pro/corp thing 20:19:16 gwolf: yes, that's what i was fretting about 20:19:59 AbsintheSyringe: 3rd time: do you want rough "room numbers" or rough "person numbers" tonight? accurate person numbers can be ready for your tomorrow morning, accurate room numbers needs more time unless we just say (as might be best) "we take them all" 20:20:06 nattie: sorry, I'm about-fretted already too much 20:20:20 moray, what will this number be used for? 20:20:31 darst: he wanted a number to phone someone with tonight 20:20:36 booking exact rooms? 20:20:39 darst: don't ask me what they will do with that 20:20:52 moray, I need to call *minister* after this meeting to tell him exact number 20:21:10 if some read what i said above you would have the answer 20:21:12 4th time: do you want rough "room numbers" or rough "person numbers" tonight? accurate person numbers can be ready for your tomorrow morning, accurate room numbers needs more time unless we just say (as might be best) "we take them all" 20:21:21 we need the number of rooms we will be paying for! 20:21:34 i am guessing this number is the sponsored ppl 20:21:35 for 5th time we want "final" number we were told to get today 20:21:42 AbsintheSyringe: exact numbers always change 20:21:49 AbsintheSyringe: exact numbers can change up to the last minute 20:21:53 gwolf, then rought whatever we can have 20:21:56 right now 20:21:59 +corp/prof from here: http://rkd.zgib.net/http/debconf/registration-data.txt 20:22:00 we cannot get exact numbers until after the conference 20:22:01 it's 5th of 20:22:02 gwolf: we know that, but we also need to work out what kind of numbers he wants now 20:22:03 July 20:22:14 AbsintheSyringe: what kind of rough numbers you want? People or rooms? 20:22:21 gwolf, people 20:22:29 I want people we are sponsoring 20:22:35 darst: do we have rough almost-final numbers? 20:22:40 including pro/corp as we are sponsoring them as well 20:22:45 if so, we can close this controversy..? 20:22:47 we want exactly 193 rooms 20:22:48 .. 20:22:53 people? 20:22:53 we don't know how many people will be in each room 20:23:00 darst: we pay per person 20:23:01 and maybe say to the accompanying extras to just pay to the hotel 20:23:02 darst, how many people is that? 20:23:18 approximately 250 20:23:33 darst: and is the 193 just the "all the above" option? 20:23:36 how many debcamp how many debconf? 20:23:51 193 is "everything booked", yes 20:24:09 I asked you, how many people do we have for debcamp and how many for debconf 20:24:12 darst: can you email AbsintheSyringe the current daily numbers? 20:24:25 AbsintheSyringe: it's different per day, maybe darst can send you the per-day numbers 20:24:30 moray, sure but I want to know them right away right now 20:24:33 approx whatever 20:24:34 I need numbers 20:24:40 AbsintheSyringe: I think he has these 'now' 20:24:47 moray, k, tnx 20:24:48 please elaborate the exact data you want by email then darst give you the answer 20:24:49 i take it the numbers are more likely to be revised downward than up, right? 20:24:52 subject to final adjustments overnight of course 20:25:07 what I want is 20:25:10 debcamp people 20:25:12 number of people 20:25:13 approx 103 people are wanting rooms for debcamp, but the exact details depend on how we can fit peolpe into the same room or not 20:25:16 debconf people 20:25:19 number of people 20:25:28 but debcamp slowly increases over time 20:25:33 and we're not getting any money from pro/crop? 20:25:39 darst: highest number of people at debcampt then 20:25:41 darst, didn't ask you that 20:25:46 asked you something else 20:26:46 AbsintheSyringe: what did you ask? 20:26:47 do you want total people or just people wanting accommodation ? 20:27:42 darst: giving both would solve either problem, and probably be interesting to the minister 20:27:43 *we want number of people that gonna be on debcamp that need a room + food we gonna pay for + how many days 20:27:52 first of all, second of all we want the same thing for debconf 20:27:55 clear? 20:27:57 food is non-accomm people too 20:28:00 potentially 20:28:07 heh 20:28:15 you can't give me accom or food? 20:28:16 and food will change depending on what people want to do each day 20:28:19 AbsintheSyringe: clear to me 20:28:22 moray, good 20:28:25 AbsintheSyringe: do you mean a total number of person-nights then? 20:28:26 darst: right, can we ignore the caveats for a moment 20:28:26 AbsintheSyringe: i think what you want is them on day-per-day 20:28:29 darst, clear to you what I want? 20:28:29 and person-meals? 20:28:32 as it changes every day 20:28:33 AbsintheSyringe: and to precisely that darst told you that the number changes day per day 20:28:36 esp for debcamp 20:28:40 or you could just give the maximum 20:28:43 again 20:28:47 so you don't need two numbers - you need 14 20:28:53 I want exact number of people that's gonna be there at debcamp 20:28:55 and debconf 20:28:57 gwolf: or one combined number 20:29:00 even during DebCamp the number changes day for day 20:29:00 that's all 20:29:03 yes, 14 is better I think 20:29:12 and I think darst already has these numbers 20:29:12 by 20:29:14 or -as nattie says- you can get combined (averaged) numbers 20:29:17 AbsintheSyringe: between 0 and 103 20:29:22 judging by what he showed me before 20:29:25 AbsintheSyringe: it changes day by day!!!! 20:29:25 zobel, don't make jokes 20:29:26 AbsintheSyringe: it changes day by day!!!! 20:29:26 AbsintheSyringe: it changes day by day!!!! 20:29:27 gwolf: I think averages will be very confusing 20:29:27 AbsintheSyringe: it changes day by day!!!! 20:29:27 it's not funny 20:29:30 zobel, settle down 20:29:37 / ban zobel 20:29:40 http://whiteboard.debian.net/777506.wb that lists the precise number of people who want a room on each day as of our data right now 20:29:41 zobel, it's been changing for 3 weeks no 20:29:42 AbsintheSyringe: no, we told you, it changes day by day 20:29:43 now* 20:29:49 zobel, did I ask you anything? 20:29:56 AbsintheSyringe: neither is your reaction funny 20:30:05 gwolf, not trying to be funny 20:30:07 AbsintheSyringe: you expect everybody to listen to your rant, but you don't listen to replies. 20:30:16 so please read before repeating the same lines 20:30:19 AbsintheSyringe: the number of debcamp attendees varies because people are arriving on different dates 20:30:19 rant? 20:30:24 you really wanna go that way? 20:30:26 gwolf: he didn't listen to questions, but now we know what he wants can we concentrate on getting it 20:30:30 not everybody is attending the entirety of debcamp 20:30:31 AbsintheSyringe: NO. I want to finish this. 20:30:31 please 20:30:37 ok 20:30:38 nattie: see darst's links 20:30:39 pleas stop 20:30:40 everybody 20:30:43 and now that page lists exact number of people who claime they want food with us, each day, and which type 20:30:47 moray: i'm not the person you need to be telling this 20:30:50 darst: thank you 20:30:55 again please let's have a final number of people 20:31:02 AbsintheSyringe: see darst's links 20:31:02 per days arriving to debcamp and same thing for debconf 20:31:14 nattie, k, tnx 20:31:15 it's all written out 20:31:16 nattie: may i suggest: you op, darst, moray and AbsintheSyringe voice, everyone else: silence now? 20:31:33 i think we're done with this topic 20:31:34 AbsintheSyringe: On the first day of DebCamp there will be about 50, and on the last day there will be about 105 20:31:35 and if you looked at the original files, it would be updated every hour with *current* numbers 20:31:53 AbsintheSyringe: does http://whiteboard.debian.net/777506.wb have everything you need? 20:31:58 darst, tnx for that link! 20:32:02 I would pick some numbers that work for you, and add a couple for errors and go with it. 20:32:05 moray, seems like it 20:32:07 AbsintheSyringe: we will check that all and get you a new version for the morning I hope 20:32:08 tnx 20:32:18 moray, these are rough right? 20:32:19 not final? 20:32:27 they are rough 20:32:29 AbsintheSyringe: that is what i meant: it changes day by day. 20:32:34 AbsintheSyringe: these are rough, but near final 20:32:36 darst, what does the "Total room-days" mean? 20:32:37 AbsintheSyringe: we will do more checks later (I hope), so rough yes 20:32:38 thinsg *will* keep changing even if we don't want it to 20:32:43 ok 20:32:56 AbsintheSyringe: but we don't expect big changes to tomorrow morning's numbers, unless we find a problem we didn't know about 20:32:57 cool, moray nattie darst thank you 20:32:59 aroundthfur: It's the total of the numbers of people for each day. 20:33:06 ok completely understandable 20:33:25 are we settled now? 20:33:28 aroundthfur: sum(over people p) days_person_p_is_staying 20:33:39 karora, total number of rooms streching throughout debconf? 20:33:42 darst: better to take off the zero lines as they're not actually right, just that data's not in penta 20:33:51 darst, tnx! 20:34:00 aroundthfur: one person staying in one room for one day is one room-day 20:34:13 AbsintheSyringe: can you confirm that the pricing (to the govt) is per person? 20:34:14 dkg, got it 20:34:23 darst: i'm assuming that if two people share a room for one day, that's two room-days, even though it's only one room -- right? 20:34:28 moray, 242 per person, yes 20:34:30 AbsintheSyringe: i.e. the wiki page has per-person prices, not per-room ones 20:34:35 dkg: correct 20:34:38 again this is not for govt or anybody else 20:34:56 besides travel we're not getting any of debian thing besides pro/.govt 20:34:57 ? 20:35:01 so maybe that should be called total person-room-days for clarity :) 20:35:14 or just "person-days" 20:35:15 good point 20:35:30 the actual rooms all depends on how room asignments can work out, which is a lot of manual work 20:35:46 AbsintheSyringe: if we are paying per-person it would be best to assume (as darst said earlier) that we will just use all the hotel rooms you booked -- in fact we can reduce it a little once we get to that 20:35:47 so actually the number that AbsintheSyringe needs is the person-days for both debcamp and debconf proper? 20:36:12 listen whatever the number was 20:36:14 it's ok 20:36:21 no matter how bad or good it is 20:36:24 nattie: I think AbsintheSyringe has what he needs? they want an understandable number, not the technically most useful one 20:36:30 I'm just trying to get it all sorted out 20:36:43 moray, it's perfectly fine, srsly tnx 20:36:51 AbsintheSyringe: so for tonight, best to use those numbers, and say we still expect to use all the hotel rooms booked 20:36:52 ok, are we done now? 20:37:20 AbsintheSyringe: we can reduce a bit probably when we get to actual room allocation, but as the price is per-person there is no advantage in reducing room count 20:37:29 (if I understand correctly) 20:37:34 should we register an action for prof/corp issue? 20:37:37 darst, does this number have the corp/prof ppl included or not? 20:37:49 i just want to calculate how much money it will cost 20:38:51 tiago, yes! 20:39:02 ok, phrasing? 20:39:18 me bad for phrasing sorry 20:39:33 #action investigate issue of professional/corporate payments with regard to accommodation 20:39:41 great thanks 20:39:42 aroundthfur, if they requested a room, it is in the numbers on the whiteboard 20:40:00 nattie: I don't quite see what is to investigate 20:40:03 darst, great 20:40:04 tnx! 20:40:15 nattie: an action suggests we are planning some action 20:40:32 perhaps clearing 20:40:48 are we done? 20:40:51 explaining the govt what those fees are 20:40:52 nattie, yes 20:40:56 aroundthfur: and if you look at the originalfiles, you can see things separated out by category 20:40:57 or rather have we done all we can do tonight? 20:41:09 tiago: ok, that's not "investigate issue" but "clear up meaning of" 20:41:18 moray: fine 20:41:27 #action clarify meaning of professional and corporate registration 20:41:31 darst, i did, but when i asked if i can use that to calculate i was ignored...so.. 20:41:34 done? 20:41:35 thank you! 20:41:36 better 20:41:37 #endmeeting