Started logging meeting in #debconf-team, times are UTC.
[20:02:19] <moray> #topic dc9 meeting: 1. sponsorpack
[20:02:29] <moray> this seems to be done now? is that correct?
[20:02:35] <moray> has it been sent to anyone yet?
[20:02:35] <h01ger> (#link is automatic if the line starts with http://)
[20:02:47] <Sledge> it's done and has been sent to a few people already
[20:02:50] * h01ger send it to the 4 people requesting it in RT
[20:02:59] <moray> Sledge: great
[20:03:05] <Sledge> I'd like to see the dc8 report too...
[20:03:11] <moray> Sledge: that's the next point :)
[20:03:12] <h01ger> antorecio, have you seen http://www.debconf.org/sponsorpack.pdf ?!
[20:03:15] <antorecio> send it a few institution and i waiting
[20:03:20] <h01ger> nice!
[20:03:23] <antorecio> yeah, thanks holguer
[20:03:48] * h01ger is trying via rt to activate some old sponsorship contacts but i fear i have to use pestering on irc now
[20:03:53] <moray> so thank you to the people who got this done -- any more we need to say about it? (there's a later point on sponsors)
[20:04:03] <h01ger> spanish translation?
[20:04:21] <moray> could be useful, *if* someone is working on sponsors who only talk Spanish
[20:04:38] <cek> maybe it is useful
[20:04:51] * h01ger nods. there was also an offer on the list, so maybe followup on this person :)
[20:04:51] <cek> I thought a Spanish guy was working on that
[20:05:18] <cek> Pablo Castellano
[20:05:23] <moray> ok, so can someone poke him?
[20:05:46] <cek> I will do it now
[20:05:58] <moray> thanks
[20:06:23] <moray> #topic 2. debconf8 final report
[20:06:31] <moray> does someone know the dc8 report status?
[20:06:43] <moray> my vague impression is it's got stuck almost-finished, but hopefully I'm wrong :)
[20:07:17] <h01ger> marga, Tincho, angasule?
[20:07:41] * Tincho here
[20:07:41] <h01ger> afaics the texts are there, it just misses the layout... maybe we should ask valessio? ;-)
[20:08:10] <Tincho> as I said yesterday, we stoppoed after getting the texts
[20:08:11] <moray> Tincho: what's the report status?
[20:08:18] <Tincho> we need to start working on it again
[20:08:24] <Tincho> review and correct texts
[20:08:29] <Tincho> do the layout, etc
[20:08:31] <moray> h01ger: I think some editing is still needed too
[20:09:06] <moray> Tincho: is svn up-to-date?
[20:09:09] <h01ger> layout usually (at least for me) works as motivation. "the result is near" :)
[20:09:13] <angasule> h01ger: just got here
[20:09:26] <Tincho> moray: afaik, yes
[20:09:59] * marga will try to work on it tomorrow
[20:10:01] * h01ger would like to be able to update the dc9 sponsorpack to say "dc8 report available $there" but maybe thats unrealistic
[20:10:06] <moray> ok -- so presumably we should all go and edit stuff if we have any spare time
[20:10:20] <moray> (I'm thinking more of native English speakers there)
[20:10:44] <h01ger> bgupta, ^ :)
[20:10:47] <moray> h01ger: certainly it would be good to send to potential sponsors
[20:11:15] <moray> Tincho/marga: on a related thing, did the conference bags go to the dc8 sponsors before now?
[20:11:23] <moray> or was that waiting for the reports?
[20:11:45] <marga> it's still waiting for reports.
[20:11:48] <moray> right
[20:11:52] <marga> So, it'll go with sponsorpack as well.
[20:11:58] <marga> both report+sponsorpack
[20:12:00] <moray> so please add dc9 sponsor packs, yes
[20:12:29] <bgupta> h01ger: I can provide copy..
[20:12:55] <bgupta> If someone put sit it back into the doc
[20:13:02] <h01ger> https://svn.debconf.org/svn/reports/dc8
[20:13:11] <h01ger> bgupta, cool
[20:13:32] <moray> bgupta: there's a file there saying what needs checked (though probably checking everything is useful, just start with the marked ones)
[20:13:50] <moray> #topic 3. sponsor status
[20:14:06] <moray> did we manage to recruit any more people for this?
[20:14:21] <moray> how is the current sponsor-finding work going?
[20:14:23] <h01ger> schultmc volunteered and Ganneff said he would add him today
[20:14:48] <moray> there's an agenda point here also about "#929 wants a booth"
[20:14:51] <Sledge> easiest thing for sponsors is to use the list(s) from prevoius years
[20:14:53] <h01ger> nobody (else) replied to my question who reads sponsors@ - though according to the outgoing rt mails, some people should
[20:14:54] <moray> can someone expand that?
[20:15:00] <Sledge> at least as a start
[20:15:02] <Hydroxide> I'm still on the sponsors rt alias from dc7.
[20:15:15] <h01ger> moray, some company wants a booth at debconf
[20:15:27] <moray> Hydroxide: just now, working on this would be a lot more helpful than bringing dc10 stuff slightly forward
[20:15:31] <Sledge> many of the bigger sponsors should be in again this year, but we've left it very late
[20:15:32] <Hydroxide> I will do what I have time for, but shouldn't commit to much at this point in time
[20:15:36] <h01ger> i think, for openday, ok, maybe, but for 7 days of debconf, i'm not really in favor
[20:15:36] <Hydroxide> moray: I'm not doing any dc10 stuff right now
[20:15:40] <moray> it *is* very late, yes :)
[20:15:49] <moray> (er, less happy smiley was meant)
[20:15:56] <Hydroxide> moray: I have my priorities straight :)
[20:16:23] <Sledge> h01ger: who did you send the pack to so far?
[20:16:34] <moray> h01ger: I don't see a big problem with them having a booth through debconf, I think they'd find it a waste of time though
[20:16:39] <Sledge> I'll start a new sponsors table file again
[20:16:51] <h01ger> Sledge, no big names, no previous years sponsors. (dunno what zobel plans ;)
[20:16:56] <Sledge> ok
[20:17:03] <moray> h01ger: so I'd more suggest to them they shouldn't waste their time/effort, possibly mention the quiet-ness of the o'reilly stand before
[20:17:19] <h01ger> the oreily stand was one day
[20:17:22] <h01ger> right?
[20:17:27] <antorecio> there are 5 regional sponsor posible
[20:17:30] <Sledge> h01ger: I've seen them go past in RT, but I *hate* RT and I'm not going to dig; can you forward me a list please?
[20:17:33] <h01ger> one day is also something different than all 7
[20:17:35] <Hydroxide> there are a lot of sponsors who sponsored in dc6 who we haven't seen lately
[20:17:38] <Hydroxide> e.g. IBM
[20:17:39] * Kinnison apologises for his tardiness but was at Tai Chi
[20:17:42] <Hydroxide> we should contact them again
[20:17:53] <Sledge> Hydroxide: well volunteered :-)
[20:18:06] <h01ger> Sledge, uhm. i'm very busy atm and i dont/cant want to play your secretary just because you dont like rt. ask luk ;)^w^w^w :)
[20:18:07] <moray> Kinnison: well, you're just in time to help with sponsor-finding :)
[20:18:34] * Kitty_ waves as a sponsor
[20:18:41] * Sledge hugs Kitty_
[20:18:42] <h01ger> hi Kinnison! tai chi sounds nice!
[20:18:49] <Sledge> Kitty_: are you feeling rich? :-)
[20:18:52] <moray> Kitty_: have you formally signed up yet? if not -- please someone arrange that!
[20:18:57] <Kitty_> Sledge: no
[20:19:05] <Kitty_> moray: erm, I am registered on the pentabarf thing
[20:19:14] <Kitty_> and I negotiated sponsorship with Sledge
[20:19:21] <antorecio> i send a mailing to the free software initiatives in Spain, a lot of regional goverments have free software politicien
[20:19:23] <Hydroxide> Sledge: hehe :) I can at least track down stockholm's contact and make sure someone contacts them
[20:19:23] <Kitty_> but I don't think Sledge was sober at the time :p
[20:20:01] <Sledge> antorecio: cool
[20:20:20] <Sledge> Kitty_: I'm sure you offered us 10K Euro :-)
[20:20:29] <bgupta> I assume you guys have established contacts with IBM? If not IBM sponsors one of our local Linux usergroups here in NYC. I can find out who the contact is. (I probably shouldn't lead discussion, but I can make an introduction).
[20:20:40] <Kitty_> lol @sledge
[20:20:54] <Sledge> bgupta: please do
[20:21:00] <h01ger> bgupta, cool & please lead as well! who else if not you?! ;)
[20:21:00] <moray> Kitty_: you laugh as you remember it was a lot more than that?
[20:21:07] <Sledge> the last IBM contacts we had are dry ime
[20:21:16] <Kitty_> moray: heh
[20:21:23] <Hydroxide> yeah, bgupta is good for knowing a bunch of contacts at megacorps with a NYC presence :)
[20:21:33] <Hydroxide> (with a connection to linux)
[20:21:50] <moray> well, at this stage we really need good contacts if big companies are going to respond in time
[20:22:15] <Hydroxide> moray: I'll also check with stockholm since he's the one who handled this pre-dc7
[20:22:20] <moray> the current economic situation is going to make them slower to sign up as well as just less generous
[20:22:28] <Hydroxide> moray: and I'll contact Google again
[20:22:39] <moray> Hydroxide: right
[20:22:56] <Hydroxide> moray: i'm the one who got Google to sponsor for the first time leading into dc7 - of course it was a different economic climate
[20:23:11] <moray> maybe a sponsorship meeting would be a good idea, if a few people are / are interested in working?
[20:23:11] <Sledge> Google should be quite easy, I hope
[20:23:17] * gwolf has got to go... sorry for the practically missed meeting. I'll log and read later :-/
[20:23:18] <Sledge> yeah, sounds like
[20:23:18] <h01ger> mhy, Ganneff: are you in talk with sun?
[20:23:29] <Sledge> h01ger: I'll talk to Sun folks
[20:23:45] <h01ger> coolio
[20:23:45] <Sledge> I can handle the existing sponsors, but any more will need more help
[20:24:00] * h01ger will talk with nokia/maemo
[20:24:11] <Sledge> but as moray says, we need a sponsors meeting
[20:24:12] <Hydroxide> Sledge: would you rather talk to Chris DiBona then? if you have a good personal relationship with him, that might be better than me
[20:24:13] <bgupta> Hydroxide, you are contacting their open source czar I take it? (Chris Dibona)
[20:24:22] <Hydroxide> bgupta: would be, yes. that's who I contacted back in 2006)
[20:24:28] <Hydroxide> s/)/
[20:24:30] <h01ger> Sledge, moray: suggest a time. next monday? 20 utc?
[20:24:32] <Sledge> Hydroxide: yeah, I know Chris and Leslie quite well already through SoC etc.
[20:24:34] <moray> do people know immediately what would be a good time for them?
[20:24:44] <moray> next Monday sounds sensible enough, unless you can all do sooner :)
[20:24:51] <Hydroxide> Sledge: in that case, you would be a better person. I wouldn't say I have a relationship with him like that
[20:24:54] <Sledge> next Monday is good
[20:24:56] <moray> (another week is already a significant wait just now)
[20:24:59] <Hydroxide> next monday is fine
[20:25:02] <moray> right
[20:25:08] <Sledge> I'll mail the list
[20:25:19] <Hydroxide> I'll bug stockholm
[20:25:32] <h01ger> Hydroxide, bgupta: maybe you should have access to sponsor mail alias and rt too?
[20:25:43] <moray> #agreed sponsorship meeting next Monday, people to work as they can before that...
[20:25:55] <h01ger> time?
[20:26:16] <Hydroxide> h01ger: I do already
[20:26:19] <moray> I was assuming same, or is different better for people
[20:26:25] <moray> the clocks will have changed in Europe
[20:26:31] <bgupta> h01ger: Makes sense. We will certainly need it for DC10, and if I can help out for DC9, that makes sense.
[20:26:35] <h01ger> Hydroxide, \o/
[20:26:47] * Hydroxide nods at bgupta
[20:27:02] <h01ger> Ganneff, mhy, sgran: please not only add schultmc but also bgupta to sponsors mail alias and rt queue
[20:27:12] <h01ger> Ganneff, mhy, sgran: thank you already! :)
[20:27:30] <moray> Sledge / Hydroxide / h01ger etc.: same time UTC or same time European time?
[20:27:37] <Sledge> same time UTC will do for me
[20:27:45] * h01ger actually too
[20:27:46] <Sledge> I've just mailed that, anyway
[20:27:48] <Hydroxide> moray: same time UTC is good for me
[20:27:50] <moray> right
[20:27:52] <moray> #topic 4. budget status
[20:28:03] <moray> this was an action from a previous meeting
[20:28:23] * h01ger thinks we need one ;)
[20:28:24] <Hydroxide> so, on the downside, we're behind on budget status stuff. on the upside, I finally got access to alioth svn - believe it or not, alioth password handling is buggy.
[20:28:28] <moray> what's the current status, either from the side of projecting sponsorship or knowing how much we need?
[20:28:41] <Hydroxide> and I've started looking at the budget document from dc8.
[20:28:59] <Hydroxide> I'll send a list of questions to cek this week.
[20:29:06] <Hydroxide> OR
[20:29:12] <Hydroxide> cek: do you have time for a budget meeting this week?
[20:29:20] <cek> ok, Hydroxide
[20:29:45] <cek> Wednesday from 17:00 to 19:00 CET?
[20:30:21] <Hydroxide> cek: hrm, I'm in UTC-4
[20:30:37] <Hydroxide> cek: let's talk a few minutes after this meeting and decide the time?
[20:30:41] <Hydroxide> cek: no need to make everyone else wait
[20:30:44] <cek> ok
[20:30:53] <Hydroxide> cek: then I can get estimates of how much things cost from you
[20:31:23] <h01ger> next point?
[20:31:23] <moray> #topic 5. local legal entity
[20:31:30] <schultmc> Hydroxide, cek: I'm available until 2100UTC most days fwiw
[20:31:39] <moray> this is related to the budget -- do we know yet what to pass money through locally?
[20:31:43] <Hydroxide> schultmc: gotcha.
[20:31:47] <h01ger> cek, did your lawyers reply?
[20:31:49] <Hydroxide> do we have anyone from debian.es here?
[20:32:06] <cek> h01ger, not yet
[20:32:10] <h01ger> we are thinking about using debian.es, "just" sorting out legal/financial hassles..
[20:32:16] <cek> I send them an email today
[20:32:25] <cek> I sent them an email today
[20:32:30] <h01ger> agi(@d.o) from debian.es might also show up here tonite..
[20:32:34] <h01ger> coolio
[20:32:45] <Hydroxide> cek: would they respond faster to a phone call?
[20:33:07] <Hydroxide> if we are going to be forced to pay taxes with debian.es, then we might have to work hard quickly to find another solution
[20:33:21] <cek> Hydroxide, I will call tomorrow
[20:33:31] <Hydroxide> thanks
[20:33:46] <cek> but within europe there is no problem, If can be a non-profit organization in Europe
[20:34:08] <Hydroxide> we might be able to work with ffis but we have to hurry up and contact them
[20:34:11] <h01ger> we just need to know soon... as sponsor might want to send us money..
[20:34:29] <Hydroxide> h01ger: they can already send to ffis and we can transfer somewhere if need be.
[20:34:34] <Sledge> we need to know as well for DC7 money
[20:34:35] <h01ger> true
[20:34:37] <cek> what about Debian-es?
[20:34:37] <Hydroxide> h01ger: (or SPI if they're not european)
[20:34:47] <Sledge> we want to close that ASAP and have money in the bank yet
[20:34:48] <h01ger> cek, see you inbox. more is not known
[20:34:50] <Hydroxide> cek: if they have the right legal status, Debian-es works
[20:34:54] <cek> ok
[20:35:02] <Hydroxide> cek: yes, see your email from h01ger and me about this
[20:35:04] <h01ger> cek, i didnt see a point in calling agi or jgs..
[20:35:08] <cek> what about Debian-de?
[20:35:19] <h01ger> s/jgs../jfs atm../
[20:35:25] <cek> I saw them already
[20:35:27] <h01ger> cek, thats basically ffis
[20:36:00] <h01ger> #debian.de is just an irc channel :) ffis e.v. is more like SPI and were the german debian crowd is having money
[20:36:37] <cek> ffis ok
[20:36:45] <h01ger> next topic?
[20:36:52] <cek> I think there is no problem in sending them the money
[20:36:58] <moray> yes, I think we don't know the answer yet
[20:37:03] <cek> as they are in the EU
[20:37:06] <h01ger> cek, but we want a spanish entity. it will be easier
[20:37:08] <moray> #topic 6. local team updates
[20:37:40] <moray> cek: what is the status with the venue and accommodation now? did you have the meeting you have talked about? did the formal letter get sent/answered?
[20:37:41] <cek> We already contacted the Junta
[20:37:53] <cek> and we have 3 more people in the local team from Junta
[20:38:35] <h01ger> nice
[20:38:47] <h01ger> are they subscribed to the list? 0:)
[20:38:48] <cek> yes, antorecio contacted with the regional goverment and they will probably pay venue and part of the accomation
[20:38:54] <cek> h01ger, not yet
[20:39:20] <Hydroxide> cek: so they are paying 100% of venue costs?
[20:39:35] <cek> and we get some numbers of how much the accomodation will cost
[20:39:42] <Hydroxide> good.
[20:39:49] <Hydroxide> we need to go over that at the budget meeting in detail
[20:39:51] <cek> Hydroxide, yes
[20:40:09] <Hydroxide> but you have numbers now?
[20:40:20] <cek> yes Hydroxide we have some numbers
[20:40:35] <cek> 30 euros per person/day
[20:40:42] <cek> accomodation and food
[20:40:54] <Hydroxide> is that what they will pay or is that the total cost?
[20:40:58] <cek> 30-35 we need to contact the catering
[20:41:01] <cek> Hydroxide, total cost
[20:41:27] <Hydroxide> and how much will they pay?
[20:41:36] <cek> Hydroxide, still don't know
[20:41:39] <Hydroxide> ah
[20:41:46] <cek> we also need to pay security
[20:41:47] <Hydroxide> can you try to find out by the budget meeting?
[20:41:52] <cek> 150 euros/day
[20:42:05] <Hydroxide> does that give us 24-hour access?
[20:42:20] <cek> Hydroxide, this security is for the residence
[20:42:25] <cek> not for the venue
[20:42:27] <Hydroxide> ah
[20:42:39] <cek> 12 hours from 20:00 till 8:00
[20:42:49] <Hydroxide> ah
[20:42:56] <cek> 20.30 euros per hour
[20:43:07] <Hydroxide> to everyone else: feel free to speak too :)
[20:43:16] <cek> that would give as 24 hours access
[20:43:32] <Hydroxide> cek: we need that if people are sleeping in the residence, right? :)
[20:43:34] <moray> Hydroxide: not much to say besides being worried about how we'll pay for this all
[20:43:47] <Hydroxide> moray: yes, I share that concern, definitely
[20:43:53] <Sledge> do we have any idea of total budget thus far?
[20:43:55] <cek> and for the rest of the people not in the residence food will cost 15 euros/day
[20:44:05] <Sledge> even a finger-in-the-air guess would be useful
[20:44:29] <Hydroxide> well, I can do some simple math now
[20:44:36] <cek> lets see how many local sponsors we get this week
[20:44:42] <moray> 150*14 + 35*300*7 + 35*80*7
[20:44:42] <cek> with the sponsor pack
[20:44:49] * h01ger thinks those details are important but not right now and here. rather for the budget meeting ;)
[20:45:06] <moray> yes
[20:45:08] <Hydroxide> that's ?95200
[20:45:09] <Hydroxide> ok
[20:45:10] <h01ger> (/me would like this meeting to finish in one hour)
[20:45:11] <Hydroxide> let's move on
[20:45:22] <Kinnison> h01ger: haha, good joke
[20:45:23] <cek> and also we will be able to use all the switches, cameras, some PCs for Free from Junta
[20:45:24] <moray> someone also asked about network status
[20:45:35] <moray> I guess they meant the uplink
[20:45:50] <h01ger> Kinnison, which one? we used to be quite successful with having 60min irc meetings
[20:45:53] <cek> we *do* need technical requirements to ask Junta about the hardware we need
[20:46:03] <moray> h01ger: a lot of agenda points today though :/
[20:46:16] <Kinnison> h01ger: s'a long agenda
[20:46:20] <moray> I thought someone was giving the network requirements after the last meeting
[20:46:23] <moray> ?
[20:46:26] <cek> I repeat, we *do* need the technical requirements (switches, PCs, cameras, etc.)
[20:46:26] * h01ger shrugs. just say #endmeeting and decide for another meeting before you do that ;)
[20:46:56] <h01ger> cek, can you send a short mail to the list requesting this please? (its not only videoteam who needs to answer this :)
[20:46:57] <moray> cek: please mail the -team list to ask for this
[20:47:09] * Hydroxide would also like some european videoteam/networking person to attend the budget meeting so that we have an idea of costs for that
[20:47:18] <cek> #info: We need to know the technical requirements (switches, PCs, cameras, etc.)
[20:47:22] <moray> cek: and someone also asked for details of audiovisual equipment that we can use there
[20:47:34] <Hydroxide> #action cek will email -team requesting the technical requirements
[20:47:38] <Hydroxide> :)
[20:47:42] <cek> thanks Hydroxide
[20:47:52] <moray> which would include whether there are already projectors/screens/speakers/etc. and whether we need to pay extra for those
[20:48:02] <h01ger> (and most of the coming points can be rather short. "RFH" - "discussed last time, we are even doing a bit better now." - "website" - "please get involved. next." ...)
[20:48:05] <moray> again, details should go to the list
[20:48:16] <h01ger> #action does only work from the chair
[20:48:23] <Hydroxide> ah, ok
[20:48:25] <moray> #topic registration/penta
[20:48:28] <cek> lol h01ger :P
[20:48:29] <h01ger> (#info does work for everybody)
[20:48:31] <moray> registration opened
[20:48:38] <moray> I don't think we have fancy graphs yet though?
[20:49:09] <Kinnison> Do we have any idea what the take-up thus-far is?
[20:49:13] <Ganneff> make an rt ticket and i look tomorrow afternoon to make graphs
[20:49:20] <Kinnison> as compared with a similar time last year?
[20:49:20] <h01ger> http://munin.debconf.org/debconf.org/skinner.debconf.org.html#Pentabarf is from last year
[20:49:33] <moray> Kinnison: not without the graphs
[20:49:43] <moray> does anyone have a number at all?
[20:49:47] * h01ger suggests to move on :-p
[20:49:47] <moray> (I'm guessing not)
[20:49:53] <Ganneff> the graphs probably just need some sql changes
[20:49:55] <h01ger> i can make a ticket
[20:50:11] <moray> anything to actually say on the CfP?
[20:50:14] <moray> it got sent AFAIK?
[20:50:18] <Hydroxide> moray: yes
[20:50:22] <Hydroxide> have we received any submissions?
[20:50:29] <moray> we wouldn't expect them until the deadline :)
[20:50:33] <h01ger> tbm asked me to put the cfp on www.debconf.org - could someone please help me with that? (enotime)
[20:50:34] * Kinnison imagines people are in a similar situation to himself
[20:50:41] * Kinnison has about five submission ideas which need refining :-)
[20:51:02] <Kinnison> I do need to know approx numbers of papers and room info so I can start planning the schedule though
[20:51:07] * h01ger has two and should just send them in :)
[20:51:17] <Ganneff> 178 people for dc9 currently
[20:51:37] <Kinnison> Presumably people from the video team will start to feed requirements for the scheduling to me as-and-when they become aware of them?
[20:52:26] <Ganneff> next graph update will show dc9 numbers on all graphs
[20:52:33] <moray> Kinnison: I guess mail the -team list to ask for what rooms there are available too (I don't know if we get all the ones that exist)
[20:52:39] * h01ger cheers Ganneff
[20:52:48] <Kinnison> moray: Nod. I am working up someplans, then I should email the list
[20:52:49] * h01ger closes ticket he just opened
[20:52:53] <Kinnison> can someone stuff a #action for me?
[20:53:17] <h01ger> moray can. Kinnison you can #info yourself
[20:53:21] <moray> #action Kinnison to start looking at schedule / poke people for room and video information
[20:53:34] <Kinnison> Thanks
[20:53:52] <moray> I made a basic visa letter and invitation letter, but we need to know who will sign it and send them out
[20:53:59] <moray> that needs to be someone in Spain
[20:54:12] <moray> could be the same as the local legal entity
[20:54:24] <moray> cek: your bid said "We can send invitations signed by an Extremaduran Minister and that is usually enough to get the visa."
[20:54:30] <moray> can you still do that?
[20:54:55] <cek> moray, yes we can
[20:55:07] <cek> we need Names and ID card
[20:55:23] <h01ger> \o/
[20:55:37] <h01ger> cek, until that, can you review the letter in svn?! :)
[20:55:49] <h01ger> who will collect names and ids?
[20:56:06] <moray> we might need to send a first version to people *soon* if a few people are hassling us urgently
[20:56:11] <cek> the official letter? we still contacted the General Director, not needed anymore
[20:56:43] <moray> cek: for the visa letters, most people will need them sent physically to them, I guess you realise that
[20:56:44] <h01ger> cek, the letter moray wrote..
[20:56:57] <cek> ohh, ok h01ger I can review it
[20:57:01] <moray> cek: so you need to work out who will physically deal with posting them off to far-away countries :0
[20:57:04] <cek> send me the link
[20:57:50] <moray> it's in SVN currently, unfinished as it needs more info
[20:57:51] <h01ger> cek, svn/debconf-team/dc9/visa/Sponsorship_letter.odt and visa/Invitation_letter.odt
[20:57:58] <moray> I can email you though
[20:58:00] <cek> moray, I think we can send it via email
[20:58:23] <cek> a scanned copy, it worked for the Debian Worksessions of Extremadura
[20:58:29] <moray> the logo got done
[20:58:31] <moray> cek: no
[20:58:39] <moray> cek: some people need real paper things for their visa applications
[20:58:40] <cek> thanks h01ger
[20:58:49] <cek> they can print it moray
[20:58:59] <moray> cek: no, that's not an original signed letter then
[20:59:04] <h01ger> cek, so we will point people requesting visas to you directly?
[20:59:24] <Hydroxide> cek: do you have anyone on your team from the Junta who is experienced in obtaining visas to visit Spain?
[20:59:24] <cek> h01ger, send them to antorecio
[20:59:30] <cek> Hydroxide, me
[20:59:39] <h01ger> cek, ok. word! :)
[20:59:59] <h01ger> #info visa requests should be directed to antorecio via email
[21:00:08] <cek> I sent invitation letters to Bangladesh, Romania, India, Israel, etc...
[21:00:15] <moray> point the visa email address at him, is better
[21:00:19] <h01ger> who writes summary, btw?
[21:00:36] <moray> the website needs more work, though I added a little extra info today
[21:00:37] <h01ger> moray, which visa email address? visa@debconf.org?
[21:00:53] <moray> h01ger: visa@ or visas@, whichever exists already
[21:01:14] <moray> so if you're still listening -- look at the website and see if you can help add stuff (it's in svn)
[21:01:31] <moray> #topic RFH
[21:01:36] <moray> which leads into... ^
[21:01:52] <h01ger> moray, i have some mails marked as "put info on the website".. hopefully i'll come around to do that..
[21:02:02] <moray> if you've been paying attention you might notice we're now getting quite close to debconf, and there's a lot of stuff to be done before it
[21:02:25] <moray> I'm sure you'll all try to help, but also see if you can each find some more people to help
[21:02:42] <h01ger> we discussed RFH last time and decided not to craft a call. i just left the topic there in fear, we wouldnt have progress. but we had progress, so... \p/
[21:02:43] <moray> people are more likely to join in if you invite them personally than if we spam everyone
[21:02:59] <moray> #topic next meeting
[21:03:07] <moray> next meeting in two weeks I guess?
[21:03:14] <moray> cek: would that work for you?
[21:03:19] <Kinnison> 6th April?
[21:03:29] <h01ger> april, 6th, 20utc
[21:03:37] <Sledge> um...
[21:03:37] <cek> sure, moray
[21:03:43] <Kinnison> h01ger: Even given we have the time-shift coming?
[21:04:03] * Kinnison suggests april 6th, 19utc
[21:04:20] <Sledge> before going on to the next meeting, AOB
[21:04:21] <Sledge> ?
[21:04:41] <h01ger> Kinnison, fine with me. but cek & anto should really decide / have more weight
[21:04:42] <bgupta> h01ger: FOr the texts you want me to review.. when do you need it done by... and who should I ask my questions to? (eg: Do you want me to actually edit quotes form non-native english speakers)
[21:04:48] <moray> Sledge: I think people are getting restless, but if you have urgent things, yes
[21:05:04] <Sledge> I've had several questions about accessibility
[21:05:08] <moray> for the time -- yes, traditionally I think we shifted an hour when UTC comes
[21:05:25] <Sledge> I've seen no info at all about that in Caceres yet - can we get some please?
[21:05:30] <Sledge> cek: ^^^ ??
[21:05:42] <h01ger> bgupta, asap/soon. work with marga, Tincho, angasule. i think fixing gramar is fine, meaning obviously not, keep funny expressions :)
[21:05:42] <moray> but I always get confused about timezone calculations, so don't ask me which way we shifted ;)
[21:05:57] * Hydroxide can do 19 utc or 20 utc but not 21 utc
[21:06:06] <moray> Sledge: http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Extremadura#Conference_Facilities
[21:06:11] <cek> Kinnison, 19 utc is ok for antorecio and me
[21:06:36] <h01ger> bgupta, we would like to show that to sponsors for dc9, so the sooner the better. but we had half a year to do this already, so noone will kill you if you slack. just if you help, that would be really cool
[21:06:49] <bgupta> marga, Tincho, angasule... I can crank it out tonight...
[21:06:52] <Sledge> ok, and rooms and travel etc?
[21:06:58] <cek> Sledge, there is info about Cáceres in the debconf wiki
[21:07:04] <moray> #action next meeting two weeks' time, 19 UTC
[21:07:22] <h01ger> #topic aob - accessibility
[21:07:29] <moray> #topic aob - accessibility
[21:07:40] <Tincho> bgupta: I'm in the process of moving to a different continent, I really don't have any free time until next week or the other :S
[21:07:58] <h01ger> Tincho, where to?
[21:08:08] <Hydroxide> Tincho -> .fr
[21:08:11] <Tincho> h01ger: france
[21:08:16] <Hydroxide> :)
[21:08:18] <Sledge> we're in danger of leaving accessibility as an after-thought
[21:08:19] <h01ger> ui
[21:08:20] <Sledge> which is not good
[21:08:38] <moray> Sledge: we have been reassured by the locals before that there are no problems for it whatsoever
[21:08:40] <h01ger> Sledge, actually we investigated the venue with that in mind. so thats not really true
[21:08:47] <Sledge> ok, that sounds better
[21:08:58] <Sledge> for people travelling, what's the best arrangements for them?
[21:09:09] <h01ger> there are pics of my shoes and my mobile showing how wide the elevator door is :)
[21:10:03] <Sledge> ...
[21:10:05] <h01ger> Tincho, how do you plan to make the report? oo.o? latex? inkscape? do you need help with that too?
[21:10:14] <angasule> bgupta: sorry, I'm here, I'm available on IRC most of the time (my other nickname is mdambrosio )
[21:10:38] <moray> Sledge: I'd suggest starting a list thread about it, probably other Spain-aware people can comment for the trains etc.
[21:10:40] <bgupta> angasule: WOuld it help if I pulled an allnighter tongiht and took care of those edits?
[21:10:45] <Tincho> h01ger: there was the idea of using the same tool as in the dc7 report... that, or latex, I think
[21:10:46] <Sledge> moray: I guess so
[21:10:51] <Kinnison> Perhaps someone with the info (photos etc) should start a page on debconf.org about site accessibility?
[21:10:56] <h01ger> Sledge, while that was serious, what is the real, concrete question atm? accessibilty of train connection to caceres?
[21:11:14] <h01ger> Kinnison, the pics are on gallery.debconf.org
[21:11:28] <angasule> bgupta: I guess, it's not like I have a life anyway, just to be clear, I'm a native speaker but I'm not from the orga team, I was just a volunteer
[21:11:58] <Kinnison> h01ger: So perhaps it needs bringing together somewhere more intuitive? If Sledge wasn't aware of them...
[21:12:05] <h01ger> so far we have been lacking to get the basics of the conf going, so i'm not surprised we havent put that special page up yet. again: help appreciated. just ask and collect information, and then put that info up on the wiki or web
[21:12:08] <Sledge> h01ger: accessibility to all of it basically
[21:12:10] * Sledge nods Kinnison
[21:12:41] <Sledge> a single page linked from the front, giving summaries of what's possible and what support we can give people would be wonderful
[21:12:45] * h01ger nods Kinnison and Sledge too, but what i just said. saidly, in todays world, visa letters are more important than accessibilty
[21:12:56] <h01ger> Sledge, totally. any takers?
[21:13:05] <h01ger> s/saidly/sadly/
[21:13:07] <Sledge> quite, I'm hoping to get people to care here
[21:13:12] <moray> Sledge: sure, we can add that as soon as you gather the info...
[21:13:28] <Sledge> I don't have the info
[21:13:52] <h01ger> cek, we asked the janitor for exact measurements of the elevators - did you get those yet? could you reask again, please?!
[21:13:54] <Sledge> but I'll prod the list to find what we have
[21:14:09] <Kinnison> Presumably a summary of the meeting will go to -team?
[21:14:12] * Kinnison has to go
[21:14:14] <h01ger> Sledge, please do :) or use rt... cek, do you have an rt account? ;)
[21:14:18] <cek> h01ger, I can reask, but don't know if it will work
[21:14:39] <cek> h01ger, no rt account
[21:14:43] <h01ger> Kinnison, afaik (might have missed it..) we havent agreed / found someone who will write a summary yet...
[21:14:49] <moray> Kinnison: we're still looking for a volunteer to write it, maybe that's you?
[21:14:50] <h01ger> cek, please reask
[21:14:58] <cek> ok
[21:15:01] <Kinnison> moray: I'm awful at meeting summaries, and now I have to go, sorry
[21:15:09] * Kinnison -> out
[21:15:30] <moray> any more AOB?
[21:15:41] <Hydroxide> cek, *: I have to go now unfortunately. I will email you tonight to set up the budget meeting. it would help if some videoteam or networking person could attend too. (i'll CC team, and will probably use doodle)
[21:15:47] <moray> Sledge: or was it only one point?
[21:15:53] <Sledge> that was it from me
[21:15:56] <moray> #endmeeting

Meeting ended.

Information on meetbot is available at meetbot.debian.net